Re: [WSG] Installing More than one version of IE6

2009-07-02 Thread Mark Harris
Hargreaves, Michael wrote: Here's another option to virtual PC which I use. I haven;t used Virtual PC in some time so I can;t really give a good comparison. But if it makes a difference Virtual box has no connection with Microsoft. http://www.virtualbox.org/ I second VirtualBox (which has jus

RE: [WSG] Installing More than one version of IE6

2009-07-02 Thread Hargreaves, Michael
"Typically, multiple installer doesn't reflect the actuality" I definitely agree with this, you just cant be sure that what you're viewing is accurate. Multiple installer products work ok but you can never really be sure that you're using the complete engine for that version. Here's another opti

RE: [WSG] Installing More than one version of IE6

2009-07-02 Thread Kepler Gelotte
Hi - I hope this is on topic - I'm asking because I try to author to good standards... I need to install IE 6.0 alongside of IE 8. Running WIN XP SP 3. The multiple installer at TredoSoft which used to work wont install - are there any other options? Darrin I use IETester: http://www.my-debug

Re: [WSG] Installing More than one version of IE6

2009-07-02 Thread Caleb Wong
I've been using browser sandbox by xenocode and i find it quite pleasant. Try it. Theres standard IE6 - 8 plus Google Chrome, Firefox 2,3 and Safari. http://www.xenocode.com/browsers Cheers Caleb On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Darrin Potaka wrote: > Hi - I hope this is on topic - I'm asking

RE: [WSG] Installing More than one version of IE6

2009-07-02 Thread Anna Vester
From: Darrin Potaka [mailto:dpot...@gmail.com] Hi - I hope this is on topic - I'm asking because I try to author to good standards... I need to install IE 6.0 alongside of IE 8. Running WIN XP SP 3. The multiple installer at TredoSoft which used to work wont install - are there any other options?

Re: [WSG] Installing More than one version of IE6

2009-07-02 Thread Adam Smith
Hi Darrin,   I use the Internet Explorer Collection (http://finalbuilds.edskes.net/iecollection.htm) from Edskes - it struggles with the really   Kind regards,   Ads,   Adam Smith Operations Analyst Network Ten 1 Saunders Street , Pyrmont NSW 2009 , Australia

Re: [WSG] Installing More than one version of IE6

2009-07-02 Thread Ben Lau
I came across this, but I'm a bit wary of any hidden downsides to it: http://www.xenocode.com/Browsers/ On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Darrin Potaka wrote: > Hi - I hope this is on topic - I'm asking because I try to author to good > standards... > I need to install IE 6.0 alongside of IE 8. Ru

[WSG] Installing More than one version of IE6

2009-07-02 Thread Darrin Potaka
Hi - I hope this is on topic - I'm asking because I try to author to good standards... I need to install IE 6.0 alongside of IE 8. Running WIN XP SP 3. The multiple installer at TredoSoft which used to work wont install - are there any other options? Darrin ***

Re: [WSG] Print Preview Cut off after 1pg

2009-07-02 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Kristine Cummins wrote: I implemented a style sheet and works fine, however all pages are being cut off after one page. Any idears? Site: http://wfdj.sbw.org/ CSS: http://wfdj.sbw.org/m/styles-print.css From what I remember, the culprit is usually floating. Try removing the main big floa

RE: [WSG] CLARIFICATION: Print Preview Cut off after 1pg

2009-07-02 Thread Kepler Gelotte
> I implemented a style sheet and works fine, however all pages are being cut off after one page. Any idears? It is doing it in Mozilla but IE is fine. Hi, Have you tried removing the overflow:hidden from the rules? I would start with the container classes. Best regards, Kepler Gelotte N

Re: [WSG] Accessible websites

2009-07-02 Thread Felix Miata
On 2009/07/02 15:20 (GMT-0400) Rick Faircloth composed: > Felix Miata wrote: >> Zoom, minimum text size and magnifiers are defense mechanisms. The basic >> problem is the pervasive offense - not respecting users' font size >> choices by incorporating them at 100% for the bulk of content. Thus, a

[WSG] CLARIFICATION: Print Preview Cut off after 1pg

2009-07-02 Thread Kristine Cummins
I implemented a style sheet and works fine, however all pages are being cut off after one page. Any idears? It is doing it in Mozilla but IE is fine. A page with more than 1 page content: http://wfdj.sbw.org/artists/ CSS: http://wfdj.sbw.org/m/styles-print.css Thank you! Kristine

[WSG] Print Preview Cut off after 1pg

2009-07-02 Thread Kristine Cummins
I implemented a style sheet and works fine, however all pages are being cut off after one page. Any idears? Site: http://wfdj.sbw.org/ CSS: http://wfdj.sbw.org/m/styles-print.css Thank you! Kristine *** List Guidelines: h

Re: [WSG] working with line-height

2009-07-02 Thread Paul Novitski
At 7/1/2009 07:19 PM, Ben Lau wrote: This is what I'm trying to achieve: http://hellobenlau.net/wsg/eg.gif So there'll be a div with padding top and bottom of 20px, and with text inside. This doesn't look to me like a line-height topic at all. If you increa

Re: [WSG] Fieldset and Legend

2009-07-02 Thread Tim Snadden
On 3/07/2009, at 8:48 AM, CK wrote: Hi, After reading the specification, it appears that the elements and are used to denote groups of related form fields. However, I can across the following code at surf the channel which appears to use it as a decorative element. Does the following u

Re: [WSG] working with line-height

2009-07-02 Thread Matijs
> > I frequently have to work with pixel-perfect design http://aspnetresources.com/blog/dear_art_director.aspx > , and I'm always having trouble with line-height in particular. Please take > a look at this example: http://www.hellobenlau.net/wsg/index.html

Re: [WSG] Fieldset and Legend

2009-07-02 Thread David Dorward
CK wrote: Hi, After reading the specification, it appears that the elements and are used to denote groups of related form fields. However, I can across the following code at surf the channel which appears to use it as a decorative element. Does the following usage, contradict the CSS specif

[WSG] Fieldset and Legend

2009-07-02 Thread CK
Hi, After reading the specification, it appears that the elements and are used to denote groups of related form fields. However, I can across the following code at surf the channel which appears to use it as a decorative element. Does the following usage, contradict the CSS specification?

Re: [WSG] Accessible websites

2009-07-02 Thread Rick Faircloth
> It is the sine qua non of accessibility And that's exactly the point I'm trying to make...just addressing the font-size issue is the most basic form of accomodation possible. We can do better. On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, Rick Faircloth wrote

Re: [WSG] Accessible websites

2009-07-02 Thread Chris F.A. Johnson
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, Rick Faircloth wrote: > But how will you magnify the images and layout as designed for me to view? > Addressing font issues is only the absolute basic attempt to make the web > more accessible...It's important to be able to see "how" something is said > and with > what supporti

Re: [WSG] Accessible websites

2009-07-02 Thread Rick Faircloth
But how will you magnify the images and layout as designed for me to view? Addressing font issues is only the absolute basic attempt to make the web more accessible...It's important to be able to see "how" something is said and with what supporting content and context, rather than just "what" is sa

Re: [WSG] Accessible websites

2009-07-02 Thread Felix Miata
On 2009/07/02 08:46 (GMT-0700) Dennis Lapcewich composed: > The technical term is presbyopia, a physical inability of the lens of the > eye to focus properly. Specifically, the lens loses its elasticity and > ability to properly focus on near objects. It is a natural course of > aging. Onse

RE: [WSG] Accessible websites (was: accessible free web hosting account)

2009-07-02 Thread Dennis Lapcewich
>> While I agree with your general sentiment, I have to say I find the >> assertion that all people aged 35-40 or more are "for all intents and >> purposes [...] web disabled and [...] in immediate need of web >> accessibility" questionable, to say the least. >> >> I'd be careful of overstating th