Re: [WSG] Ordered list start value

2009-09-29 Thread David Dorward
On 29 Sep 2009, at 00:45, Ben Buchanan wrote: The only valid way to change the numbering of lists in strict XHTML is to put a value= on each LI. The value attribute for li elements doesn't appear in Strict. http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/index/attributes.html is marked with an L, so it appears

Re: [WSG] Ordered list start value

2009-09-29 Thread Ben Buchanan
On 29 Sep 2009, at 00:45, Ben Buchanan wrote: The only valid way to change the numbering of lists in strict XHTML is to put a value= on each LI. The value attribute for li elements doesn't appear in Strict. http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/index/attributes.html is marked with an L, so it appears

Re: [WSG] [Spam] :The wisdom? of using q to clear

2009-09-29 Thread Nancy Johnson
I'm not sure q is supported by all browsers. Nancy On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:26 AM, designer desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.uk wrote: - Original Message - From: Ben Buchanan 2009/9/27 designer desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.uk Thanks to all who replied. However, no-one said don't

Re: [WSG] [Spam] :The wisdom? of using q to clear

2009-09-29 Thread David Dorward
On 29 Sep 2009, at 15:35, Nancy Johnson wrote: I'm not sure q is supported by all browsers. It isn't, but so what? It still causes problems in browsers which do support it when it is abused. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk

Re: [WSG] [Spam] :The wisdom? of using q to clear

2009-09-29 Thread designer
- Original Message - From: David Dorward da...@dorward.me.uk To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 3:52 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] [Spam] :The wisdom? of using q to clear On 29 Sep 2009, at 15:35, Nancy Johnson wrote: I'm not sure q is supported by all

[WSG] new site review

2009-09-29 Thread Raul Ferrer
Hi guys! It's been quite a long time since I last contributed to this list but I've been busy making my own website. It's built on Expression Engine (my first one with this CMS) and I'd really would like to know what you guys think. http://www.raulferrer.com Things to keep in mind: the

Re: [WSG] new site review

2009-09-29 Thread Chris F.A. Johnson
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Raul Ferrer wrote: http://www.raulferrer.com The contrast between most of the text and its background is so low as to be unreadable. -- Chris F.A. Johnson, webmaster http://woodbine-gerrard.com

RE: [WSG] new site review

2009-09-29 Thread Rick Faircloth
Looks good, Raul! I'm able to read the text without problem, on both analog and digital monitors. Don't make the text contrast any less, however, especially in the menu, as those with lesser quality monitors and poorer eyesight might have difficulty reading it. Would recommend a Home menu item,

Re: [WSG] new site review

2009-09-29 Thread Danny Croft
Hi Raul, On the contact page is it supposed to say ...and bring your project to live or ...and bring your project to life ? Just an observation. Danny On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.comwrote: Looks good, Raul! I'm able to read the text without problem,

RE: [WSG] new site review

2009-09-29 Thread Chabot, Elliot
A good validator for color contrast is the Contrast Analyser at http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/contrast-analyser.html - which validates against the luminosity standards set out in Guidelines 1.4.3 and 1.4.6 of the W3C's WCAG 2.0 standard. Elliot -Original Message- From:

Re: [WSG] [Spam] :The wisdom? of using q to clear

2009-09-29 Thread David Dorward
On 29 Sep 2009, at 18:35, designer wrote: I'm not sure q is supported by all browsers. It isn't, but so what? It still causes problems in browsers which do support it when it is abused. Such as what? (serious question - as I said, I'm not using this method, but enquiring minds like to

[WSG] RE: new site review

2009-09-29 Thread Raul Ferrer
Hi guys! Thanks for your comments! @Sarah: Thanks :) That's really nice to hear, and yes, I wanted to put more thinking on the text so that it would look a bit friendly yet not too geeky :P @Chris: Thanks, it's great to get some criticism. However, it's the first time I get a reply on problems

RE: [WSG] new site review

2009-09-29 Thread Cem Meric
It's built on Expression Engine (my first one with this CMS) and I'd really would like to know what you guys think. http://www.raulferrer.com Nice site Raul, I share the comments from Chris on problems with readability. Other than that, really like what you've done. Also, I am part of

Re: [WSG] new site review

2009-09-29 Thread Paco Lira
The website is nice but you should but links to the pages in your portfolio. On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Cem Meric cem.me...@kalkadoon.net wrote: It's built on Expression Engine (my first one with this CMS) and I'd really would like to know what you guys think.

Re: [WSG] new site review

2009-09-29 Thread Roberto Gorj√£o
Hi, Raul: Nice looking website. Top grey text could in fact use more contrast. I also think that it is a shame that the text in the menu was converted for such small images. There was no need for it as the font used is pretty common and you lost there a lot of usability and accessibility, as