Will HTML5 make the Web even more invalid?
http://rebuildingtheweb.com/en/html5-make-web-more-invalid/
Can you provide any reason why you keep posting links to this site?
Yes the blog _seems_ to be about web standards, but the posts
are just speculation of poor quality and based on the lack of
Rimantas,
How can you be so sure yourself about what you just posted regarding HTML5
vs. XHTML?
Thanks,
Jason
http://flexewebs.com/semantix
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Rimantas Liubertas riman...@gmail.comwrote:
Will HTML5 make the Web even more invalid?
Hi Rimantas
Why did I post this link? Because the article has an interesting take
on HTML5.
This does mean that I agree or disagree with the article. I hoped that
the article would lead to discussion and debate. I had also hoped that
any discussion or debate would be conducted in a
Russ,
Even though I have a lot of experience with GUI development and standards,
and have my own opinions on things, I am reading your links everytime you
send them out. Any article matters. Please, keep sending those.
Thanks!
Anya V. Gerasimchuk
Web Designer, IT - Web Shared Services
I will be on leave until Monday 04 Jan. For any urgent inquiries please contact
Lin VanOevelen (620 75466).
---
This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged. If
you are not the intended recipient,
Juleferie... tiltrængt og fortjent (måske) Men er sporadisk på mail og kontoret
indtil 4. januar, hvor alt er normalt igen.
Christmas and New Year - some well earnt days far away from the office.. Will
be back January the 4th 2010. If it is most urgent then you can try text me on
+45 22 68 67
I agree... keep sending the links! It is up to us as to what we chose to
read or not.
Dory
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:06 AM, agerasimc...@unioncentral.com wrote:
Russ,
Even though I have a lot of experience with GUI development and standards,
and have my own opinions on things, I am
I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions on this site.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Best,
~d
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Russ, please keep us updated with the light reading links. Thanks for your
effort!
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Dory nordicz...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree... keep sending the links! It is up to us as to what we chose to
read or not.
Dory
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:06 AM,
I can see you are an artist. It looks like a website that's been designed by
an artist.
Looking at the site in Firefox my first reaction is to want to drag it to
the left. Somehow being right aligned it feels uncomfortable - I wonder why
the white space on the left.
I was also a little puzzled
Chris Price wrote:
Looking at the site in Firefox my first reaction is to want to drag it
to the left. Somehow being right aligned it feels uncomfortable - I
wonder why the white space on the left.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
--
Chris Price
So drag it to a 640 window?
Best,
- Original Message -
From: David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com
I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions on this site.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
It's very nice - it's clean, the importance of graphic design/typography
shows in the design, and it exhumes a sense of
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:13 PM, David Laakso
da...@chelseacreekstudio.com wrote:
I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions on this site.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
I would prefer if set 1 were expanded by default, and if set 1
through set 3 were presented as tabs on the same line,
I like the elegancy of the site, but think that Navigation is slightly
confusing. I also wasnt' sure where I am - Home or About? You are
having two links, but it's actually the same page. Also, you put Gustav
Klimt as your first Portfolio item, but I (that was my first impression)
thought
designer wrote:
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
However - there is always a 'BUT' - for my taste it's lopsided!
O.K., now tell me you spent hours making the spacing work that way
because it's what you wanted!
Bob
Hours? Hours nothing: it took a lifetime that spacing, Bob :-) .
O.K., so David Laakso's recent mail made me realise that I need (want) to catch
up. I looked online for any html 5 books, and there are a LOT! So, could I
please have your recommendations on (recent) books which tell the reader 'how
to write html 5'
Many thanks,
Bob
designer wrote:
O.K., so David Laakso's recent mail made me realise that I need (want)
to catch up. I looked online for any html 5 books, and there are a
LOT! So, could I please have your recommendations on (recent) books
which tell the reader 'how to write html 5'
Many thanks,
Bob
If you need (want) to catch up, I would start with this one. :)
Beginning HTML5 and CSS3: Next Generation Web Standards, by Christopher Murphy
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1430228741
Good luck!
/Palle Zingmark
http://www.palleman.nu
http://twitter.com/palleman
On Dec 22, 2009, at 20:10
+1 for my weekly dose of Some links for light reading!
Jeremy Cabral
mobile: 0410 319 212
// skype: jeremycabral
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Jean-Jacques Halans hal...@gmail.comwrote:
Keep em coming Russ!
They are links for light reading after all, not gospel.
It obviously worked
I reckon HTML5 Nazis should chill our regarding the XHTML debates as HTML5
and XHTML are interchangeable terms.
Comments like this other guy made just add unnecessary negativity to the
whole thing.
Russ is a legend in his own right and no one should even attempt to cyber
bully him. ;-)
On Tue,
It obviously worked in provoking discussion.
Where do you see discussion there? Does keep them coming count as one?
I am all for them coming but I'd like some QA applied to them too.
(And I reserve the right to keep my opinion about the original commenter to
myself ;-)
Don't be shy. I will
I reckon HTML5 Nazis
I thought I was being rude there…
should chill our regarding the XHTML debates as HTML5
and XHTML are interchangeable terms.
How so? HTML5 has XML serialization, but that does not make HTML5 and XHTML
interchangeable in any way.
Comments like this other guy made just
Guys,
Shouldn't this be a separate thread?
Thx
Pete
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Rimantas Liubertas riman...@gmail.comwrote:
It obviously worked in provoking discussion.
Where do you see discussion there? Does keep them coming count as one?
I am all for them coming but I'd like some QA
Rimantas:
HTML5 guys keep saying that HTML5 supports XML syntax, hence us XHTML freaks
can use XHTML5 without having to complain about anything. Maybe have a
discussion with our friend Bruce Lawson who will essentially tell you the
same thing.
I think you are being a bit too harsh on our friend
Guys,
Shouldn't this be a separate thread?
Maybe there shouldn't be any thread in the first place. On the other
hand, my complaint
was about Some links.
Anyhow, I won't bother you anymore. My apologies to anyone offended.
Have a great holidays
and less Out of office replies next year.
Best
- Original Message -
From: Rimantas Liubertas riman...@gmail.com
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)
Regards,
Rimantas
--
http://rimantas.com/
Mark Pilgrim is currently writing Dive Into
HTML5http://diveintohtml5.org/to be later published by O’Reilly.
A really great resource to learn more about HTML5.
--
Samuel Santos
http://www.samaxes.com/
http://twitter.com/samaxes
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Palle Zingmark pa...@palleman.nu
27 matches
Mail list logo
