Re: [WSG] I need a professional eye.

PurencoolGmail wrote: Hi everyone, I need a professional eye. I have been developing this site for two weeks (with help from this email group) and now that I think I have finished. All I want to know is there too much css? The site is www.purencool.com Any feed back would be great and you do

Re: [WSG] I need a professional eye.

At 1/29/2010 08:36 PM, PurencoolGmail wrote: The site is www.purencool.com All I want to know is there too much css? No. Regards, Paul __ Paul Novitski Juniper Webcraft Ltd. http://juniperwebcraft.com PS: Are you *sure* this is all you want to know? What does

[WSG] I need a professional eye.

Hi everyone, I need a professional eye. I have been developing this site for two weeks (with help from this email group) and now that I think I have finished. All I want to know is there too much css? The site is www.purencool.com Any feed back would be great and you don't have to be nice. -

Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!

On 30/01/2010, at 11:04 AM, Peter Mount wrote: Even with closed systems like intranets you're "playing with fire" if you don't have regard for accessibility. Agreed. Web applications built ‘for' closed intranets are the reason so many corporates still have IE6 installed. There are perfectl

Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!

On 30/01/10 3:09 AM, Jason Grant wrote: > Please have a read of my article and comment via email or on the blog > itself. > > http://www.flexewebs.com/semantix/accessibility-does-not-matter/ Let's see - how to put this? Ah: "Bottom line? You are wrong." ~mark *

Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!

Nor, apparently, does a page which works: . -- Chris F.A. Johnson === Author: Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solu

Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!

After reading the article myself I agree Jason is wrong. Even with closed systems like intranets you're "playing with fire" if you don't have regard for accessibility. I haven't been posting to this list very much lately but I just had to say something about this. Peter Mount Web Developm

Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!

Also posted on your blog: "When accessibility matters: There are clear circumstances within which accessibility is incredibly relevant and should be implemented by all means possible. A company cares about their users, wanting to ensure a wide as possible accessibility in order to avoid

Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!

At 1/29/2010 06:09 AM, Jason Grant wrote: I feel there has been LOADS of 'accessibility is a must' type discussion on this list, but at the same time I feel that there is loads of arguments which are essentially 'accessibility for the sake of accessibility'. My point is that we are heading towar

Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!

On 29/01/2010 14:09, Jason Grant wrote: I was going to post a big debate on 'Why accessibility doesn't matter' to this list, but have delegated it to a blog post on the similar subject instead. I feel there has been LOADS of 'accessibility is a must' type discussion on this list, but at the same

Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!

Not a bad read. I'm about halfway in between your view and "accessibility all the time". I do agree that there is a lot of accessibility for the sake of accessibility, however, there are also lots of things that are so easy to do that they should always be done, even if your target market doe

[WSG] Accessibility does not matter!

Hello friends, I was going to post a big debate on 'Why accessibility doesn't matter' to this list, but have delegated it to a blog post on the similar subject instead. I feel there has been LOADS of 'accessibility is a must' type discussion on this list, but at the same time I feel that there is