Hi Ellen
A list is semantically correct. It also has advantages for screen reader
users as they can navigate lists with a simple key combination.
Glen
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 2:33 AM, wrote:
> *
> WEB STANDARDS GROUP MAIL LIST
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Thierry Koblentz
wrote:
>> "/>" is not necessary to close the meta tag.
>>
>>
>>
>> Maybe this solve the problem.
>
Thierry is correct, the "/" made no difference. It was put back in.
Thanks all.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Lo
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
>
> change the above line to just that will take care of this error.
>
>
>
>>
> this line will also throw an error due to too many dashes
>
>
Thanks Jason! That's fabulous! Changing the HTML element was the trick!
I can't, however, change the number of da
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
>
> change the above line to just that will take care of this error.
>
>
>
>>
> this line will also throw an error due to too many dashes
>
>
Thanks Jason! That's fabulous! Changing the HTML element was the trick!
I can't, however, change the number of da
> "/>" is not necessary to close the meta tag.
>
>
>
> Maybe this solve the problem.
Imho, the "/" should make no difference, I believe the problem is that this
meta is too far down in the markup.
The OP should try to put that meta right after
--
Regards,
Thierry
www.tjkdesign.com | www.ez-
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> No luck there, but thanks. Here's the head to my page:
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
change the above line to just that will take care of this error.
>
this line will also throw an error due to too many dashes
--
-
> That was it. I was using Paul Irish's trick with conditional comments
> to feed IE's CSS w/o conditionals with this:
>
And when I said "w/o conditionals" I mean the traditional method,
feeding IE's their own sheets. But, as I said, I'll be going back to
that now.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:11 PM, David Dorward wrote:
>
> On 27 Aug 2010, at 19:30, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>> Line 12, Column 21: A charset attribute on a meta element found after
>> the first 512 bytes.
>>
>> Can anyone tell me why?
>
>
> You have too much content before the meta tag.
>
That wa
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Gregorio Espadas wrote:
> "/>" is not necessary to close the meta tag.
>
>
>
> Maybe this solve the problem.
>
>
> Gregorio Espadas
> gespadas.com
> @gespadas
>
No luck there, but thanks. Here's the head to my page:
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
Title
On 27 Aug 2010, at 19:30, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Line 12, Column 21: A charset attribute on a meta element found after
> the first 512 bytes.
>
> Can anyone tell me why?
You have too much content before the meta tag.
--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk
*
"/>" is not necessary to close the meta tag.
Maybe this solve the problem.
Gregorio Espadas
gespadas.com
@gespadas
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> In an attempt to begin "using HTML5", I am getting this error:
>
> Line 12, Column 21: A charset attribute on a m
In an attempt to begin "using HTML5", I am getting this error:
Line 12, Column 21: A charset attribute on a meta element found after
the first 512 bytes.
Can anyone tell me why?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.
Hello Everyone,
The W3C HTML 5 Working Group Chairs have decided to drop the longdesc
attribute from the HTML specification after a poll on the issue [1]
[2].
The Chairs' Decision states that:
QUOTE
This issue can be reopened if new information comes up. Examples of
possible relevant new inform
13 matches
Mail list logo
