Re: [WSG] Question on servers and Email campaign
Don't share your root access with anyone. On 11-Nov-08, at 7:41 PM, Graphics Web Designing, LLC wrote: I am sorry to ask this question but I am very curious as to how others feel about this. I have a client that is purchasing E-mail listings from a company called expedia mail and I Was called and asked for my server's root access information so that they can download their Software onto my server for my clients email campaign. I refuse to give anyone access to MY server let alone my root access. Am I being rude and uncooperative on this or am I right? According to the lady I spoke with she claims that I am uncooperative and that they have many Companies give out there root access information to their servers. I just can NOT put my other clients at risk and give some other company access to my server Where they have full access to my server and all of my clients and my servers information and in Addition they can do as they please once I give them my root access information. Again, I would like to thank all for reading this post and I do hope this is not against WSG standards. But I am really needing confirmation that I am not losing it and that I was right in protecting My clients as well as my server. Sherri Graphic’s Web Designing, LLC (941)876-4609 (941)889-8336 Cell Have a great day. http://www.webgraphicdesigning.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] URL length best practices
Wait so would it make more sense to include keywords in your link for you main navigation? so instead of about I would make it about-andrew-brown? On 4-Nov-08, at 11:21 PM, Joe Ortenzi wrote: I said no direct reason, but you point is a good reason to consider short URLs but this is not always possible, but yes, typablity is a good thing too. On 05/11/2008, at 11:27 AM, silky wrote: On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Joe Ortenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: other than making sense and having a strong connection with the page the content is on, there is no direct reason, other than being a bit sensible about it, I wouldn't advise testing out the 2048 characters. of course there is a good reason: so it's typable. not every url should required to be clicked to be gotten to. -- noon silky http://skillsforvilla.tumblr.com/ http://www.themonkeynet.com/armada/ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Joseph Ortenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] +61 (0)434 047 804 http://www.typingthevoid.com http://twitter.com/wheelyweb http://www.linkedin.com/in/jortenzi Skype:wheelyweb http://au.movember.com/mospace/1714401 *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Writing authoritative content
This isn't a magazine website?, its a physical magazine? On 25-Oct-08, at 4:43 PM, Aaron Wheeler wrote: Thanks Edward You have been a very good help to me, I will try to be as accurate in my magazine as possible and that is why I am asking for help (I will pass pdf's of the magazine as it goes along the production stage for all you guys to have a look if you like and let me know). I would appreciate any ideas, what would you like from a magazine. I am trying to include good informative articles on current issues with browser compatibility as well as the focus on css3 when it is released full with browsers that fully support this function. So any ideas you or anyone else has on what you would like please let me know. If you have any issues regarding this email please feel free to contact me on the details below. Aaron Wheeler Tel: 01483 860 235 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.stageguy.co.uk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Clarke Sent: 25 October 2008 21:00 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Writing authoritative content I don't doubt your intentions, the more useful resources there are the more the standards are raised but people will interpret / get led by / take as gospel information they receive when the source of the information is, in their eyes, authoritative. With this comes a responsibility to be factually accurate and be of unquestionable quality. Just look at the UK's current education system for the results of poor teaching, economically unproductive numpties who struggle to spell correctly. I wouldn't worry too much about arguments, let it fall on deaf ears, but do heed knowledge and experience from seasoned coders here, after all, it's something you'll be expecting your readership to do ;) WSG is a very productive list for students of standards so you're definitely in the right place. I wish your magazine every success. Regards, Edward Clarke www.ebizconsultancy.co.uk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Wheeler Sent: 25 October 2008 20:40 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Writing authoritative content Edward Sorry but to elaborate further, I found this problem to with so many people offering the true compliant ways to code and not performing and once again blaming the web for their mistakes. I would like to point out this is why I have turned to this site as a means to help out on my magazine to make sure all stuff is compliant. I was going to send an email next saying any articles that are made for my magazine if they were posted in these emails. If when people got a chance could please read and confirm all this. I do not mean to upset people and start arguments which some people would seem want to I just want a magazine that is easy to follow and keeps us to a line with compliant standards. If you have any issues regarding this email please feel free to contact me on the details below. Aaron Wheeler Tel: 01483 860 235 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.stageguy.co.uk *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1742 - Release Date: 25/10/2008 09:53 *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Writing authoritative content
I know but people still read magazines? On 25-Oct-08, at 5:22 PM, Edward Clarke wrote: Andrew, I'm not sure who those questions were aimed at but does the medium matter if the information is the same? It's the validity of the content that's at question here. Regards, Edward Clarke www.ebizconsultancy.co.uk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Brown Sent: 25 October 2008 22:16 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Writing authoritative content This isn't a magazine website?, its a physical magazine? *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please
If you want to really rock the javascript, I'd go pick up pragmatics book http://www.pragprog.com/titles/cppsu/prototype-and-script-aculo-us I became a rockstar at javascript after this book On 24-Oct-08, at 3:35 PM, liorean wrote: 2008/10/24 Nancy Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A bit off topic, but not totally: are there any free good online tutorials (best practices and/or standards based) to help me learn to write javascript? Well, not a comprehensive learn-javascript-from-scratch course, but this is a really good place to find tutorials or articles about separate areas of JavaScript: uri:http://www.d.umn.edu/itss/support/Training/Online/webdesign/javascript.html -- David liorean Andersson *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please
W3Schools is S 1995 On 24-Oct-08, at 6:59 PM, Brett Patterson wrote: Why would you avoid w3schools? They do have some good information. So why? On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Nancy Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A bit off topic, but not totally: are there any free good online tutorials (best practices and/or standards based) to help me learn to write javascript? Thanks, Nancy This is the best javascript lesson book online that i've found. Avoid w3cSchools at all costs. http://eloquentjavascript.net/ On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:32 PM, James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The language itself is NOT object-orientated, its proto-type based. It can be used in an OOP fashion, but this is not true Object Orientation as it is in languages such as C++. I've already covered this earlier, but in short, prototype-based, and object oriented are not mutually exclusive. they are orthogonal concepts. Javascript is prototype based AND object oriented. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Flash replace Javascript in Future?
Flex is terribly brittle and has very strange conventions. I don't see flash replacing javascript. Maybe will all be using flash browsers one day. On 18-Oct-08, at 11:01 AM, Simon Josephson wrote: I don't know of the appropriateness here (etiquette) being a newbie... though Adobe's agenda is to make Flash an entire environment within which to work... AKA - Air It is very neat and you may find of interest the Flex developer website found here... http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/ Adobe is hoping it becomes ubiquitous to the web Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 17/10/2008, at 12:27 AM, Charles Ling wrote: Hi Guys/Gals, I would like to get some opinion from you all, that would Flash 10 or ++ will replace JavaScript in the future? According to this blog : http://ajaxian.com/archives/flash-10-and-the-bad-news-for-javascript-interaction . I found that alot of media website started to replace Javascript to play their audio/video and of course Flash required to be install as third party plugin and had to be updated (which is annoying). Did you guys/gals use alot of flash in your past projects that you were working with? Cheers, Charles. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] [IE7 Glitch] footer is expanding, and acting wonky with scrolling.
Hi WSG! I've got a footer with rounded corners. I have a div.footer_wrap and div.footer for each corner. The technique worked already with all my other rounder corners. The only issue appears in the footer, maybe because its the only thing prone to scroll? Does anyone know what would fix this? I exhausted my self with various solutions. The live demo is here: http://monsterboxpro.com/dump/webtemp/index.html *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] [IE7 Glitch] footer is expanding, and acting wonky with scrolling.
Margin is already set to zero. Removing the padding will fix it, but then there's no padding which defeats the purpose. Remove the p doesn't seem proper practice, and then applying padding to either div footer elements still causes the problem. Its just strange its only a problem with the footer and no other element with rounded corners on my page. I've come across this IE glitch I just can't find the solution to solve it again. On 9-Oct-08, at 2:53 PM, Сергей Кириченко wrote: just remove margin of p or p itself 2008/10/9 Andrew Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi WSG! I've got a footer with rounded corners. I have a div.footer_wrap and div.footer for each corner. The technique worked already with all my other rounder corners. The only issue appears in the footer, maybe because its the only thing prone to scroll? Does anyone know what would fix this? I exhausted my self with various solutions. The live demo is here: http://monsterboxpro.com/dump/webtemp/ index.html *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] Layout Glitch :: Help Me!
Help me WSG! Hello community, I am having one of those want to pull your hair out problems and cannot seem to isolate what is causing it. Here is the URL http://www.zargomedia.org/dump/services.html Problem: View this page in FireFox: Looks beautiful. View this page in IE 6: Gap above my header div element. I could place the div tag inside the header to remove the gap but then my corners will not be transparent. Maybe someone has a magical CSS attribute to solve my problem? ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Layout Glitch :: Help Me!
Thank you Georg, I had not known that about IE and I believe has also caused me to compensate many other designs. Thank you for that information. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gunlaug Sørtun Sent: March 5, 2006 8:52 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Layout Glitch :: Help Me! Andrew Brown wrote: http://www.zargomedia.org/dump/services.html Problem: View this page in FireFox: Looks beautiful. View this page in IE 6: Gap above my header div element. I could place the div tag inside the header to remove the gap but then my corners will not be transparent. Maybe someone has a magical CSS attribute to solve my problem? That's a typical HTML problem in IE/win. IE interprets an empty element as if it has content inside, and adds line-height to it. That creates the gap. Solution: put an HTML comment inside the empty div, as IE6 will then treat it correctly as if it has no content, thus no line-height. div class=container_top!-- --/div You can also define 'font-size: 1px; line-height: 0;' to the empty element and achieve the same effect. Not as reliable though. Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] [CSS Question] Single Vs Multiple.
Hello WSG, I first have something to share and as well I have a question. Firstly I have been franticly book marking and today my professor found the ultimate bookmark. Some may have already come across it but thought I'd show just in case. Go here and say WOW. http://www.alvit.de/handbook/ I have created a CSS for the layout of my website. There will probably be a considerable amount of content on each page that will use CSSs. Would it be wiser to have separate CSSs to manage the content on each separate page or have it all bunched into one CSS? ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] [CSS Question] Single Vs Multiple.
Thanks Christian, Thank you for your help. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Montoya Sent: February 18, 2006 8:56 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] [CSS Question] Single Vs Multiple. On 2/18/06, Andrew Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello WSG, I first have something to share and as well I have a question. Firstly I have been franticly book marking and today my professor found the ultimate bookmark. Some may have already come across it but thought I'd show just in case. Go here and say WOW. http://www.alvit.de/handbook/ Eh, dated. I have created a CSS for the layout of my website. There will probably be a considerable amount of content on each page that will use CSSs. Would it be wiser to have separate CSSs to manage the content on each separate page or have it all bunched into one CSS? You should definitely go with the same CSS for all pages. CSS gets cached by the browser, so even if you have 100 pages, the stylesheet only gets downloaded once. If it really does get heavy, you can break it up into 2 or 3 files, but the point is to reuse the file from page to page. -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] [IE 6 Problem] -Container will not align centre to the page.
Thank you Hunt, I hadn't even noticed I included that xml tag. I was playing around with SVG shapes half of year ago and I grabbed the Doctype from that document without thought. Thank you for the reminder. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lachlan Hunt Sent: February 13, 2006 9:48 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] [IE 6 Problem] -Container will not align centre to the page. Omen King wrote: I have gone about creating this site for a class I have. I have been using in the past XHTML 1.0 strict but the doctype we must use is XHTML 1.1 Strict and it is giving me trouble. Firstly, XHTML 1.1 Strict doesn't exist, it's just XHTML 1.1. Don't confuse it with XHTML 1.0 Strict/Transitional/Frameset, there are no such variants for XHTML 1.1. Secondly, is your teacher aware of the fact that real world browsers don't support XHTML 1.1 properly, and that some don't support it at all? Most notably, no version of IE supports it - anyone who says (or tries to show) otherwise is lying. Perhaps my recent article would be an enlightening read for both you and your teacher. http://lachy.id.au/log/2005/12/xhtml-beginners I have already know the problem is some kind of rule issue. I am researching the problem currently but if anyone already knows the anwser it would be greatly appericated. Please view this page both in IE 6 and Firefox. http://www.monsterboxproductions.com/hwk/thedigitallibary/index.html It appears to work in Firefox, IE7 and Opera just fine (though, it really only works in IE thinks it's receiving HTML, not XHTML - it's a MIME type issue). I don't have IE6 available to test in without uninstalling IE7. However, you need to be aware that using the XML declaration triggers quirks mode in IE6 (they fixed that bug in IE7) and this may be the cause of your immediate problem. Remove this line: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8? To fix any other problems correctly, it requires using the correct MIME type. The easiest way is to change the file extension to .xht or .xhtml and add this line to your .htaccess file on your server (create it if you don't have one, Google for .htaccess files for more info) AddType application/xhtml+xml .xht .xhtml (After doing this, you won't be able to view it in IE, only Firefox, Opera and other descent modern browsers, but you will learn a valuable lesson none-the-less) -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] [Fixed div elements] - Having troubles with IE
Bret! That is exactly what am I talking about. I applaud your skill, but not your memory :) I am trying to pick away at your css to figure out how you got it working but so far I have had no luck. I will most likely create a new page away from the code I have no to see if I can just get it working. Thanks for pointing me in some direction! -Andrew Brown -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bert Doorn Sent: February 1, 2006 2:16 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] [Fixed div elements] - Having troubles with IE G'day Andrew Brown wrote: I changed the doctype to strict locally and still the scrollbar does appear. I also already have those additional tags added. Do you know of a website that has enough content that scrolls and has div banners such as mine only done in css? I cannot say I have saw many that do. I am still on top of this. Kinda like www.sure-kleen.com ? Don't ask me how I did it - I forgot. But if it does what you want, feel free to reverse-engineer. Regards -- Bert Doorn, Better Web Design http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/ Fast-loading, user-friendly websites ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] [Fixed div elements] - Having troubles with IE
Hello WSG, I am currently building a website. It displays correctly in Fire Fox but I am having difficulties with Internet Explorer. http://www.monsterboxproductions.com/pcmedic_temp/pcmedic_temp.html The page has two fixed div elements. There is a div at the top and bottom of the page. I was previously having difficulties getting the bottom div to correctly display but I have overcome that problem. My problem is the fact that the page in Internet Explorer is not scrollable. I am not sure why and I was using tagsoup's tutorial on having fixed div elements to display properly. http://tagsoup.com/-dev/null-/css/fixed/#demos Any suggestions are appreciated. For easy of use I have added mirco buttons on the bottom the page to check validation and to view the code. I would like to give credit to http://www.slipsnisse.se/ for their Esacpe HTML coding tool http://www.slipsnisse.se/tools/coding-tools.php -Andrew Brown ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] [Fixed div elements] - Having troubles with IE
Hey Grant, I changed the doctype to strict locally and still the scrollbar does appear. I also already have those additional tags added. Do you know of a website that has enough content that scrolls and has div banners such as mine only done in css? I cannot say I have saw many that do. I am still on top of this. Thanks for the link Grant :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Focas, Grant Sent: February 1, 2006 12:58 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] [Fixed div elements] - Having troubles with IE IE (up to IE6) does not recognise position:fixed. Try something like http://web.tampabay.rr.com/bmerkey/examples/fake-position-fixed.html Cheers, Grant -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Brown Sent: Wednesday, 1 February 2006 02:56 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] [Fixed div elements] - Having troubles with IE Hello WSG, I am currently building a website. It displays correctly in Fire Fox but I am having difficulties with Internet Explorer. http://www.monsterboxproductions.com/pcmedic_temp/pcmedic_temp.html The page has two fixed div elements. There is a div at the top and bottom of the page. I was previously having difficulties getting the bottom div to correctly display but I have overcome that problem. My problem is the fact that the page in Internet Explorer is not scrollable. I am not sure why and I was using tagsoup's tutorial on having fixed div elements to display properly. http://tagsoup.com/-dev/null-/css/fixed/#demos Any suggestions are appreciated. For easy of use I have added mirco buttons on the bottom the page to check validation and to view the code. I would like to give credit to http://www.slipsnisse.se/ for their Esacpe HTML coding tool http://www.slipsnisse.se/tools/coding-tools.php -Andrew Brown ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain privileged information or confidential information or both. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender. ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
