This element is generally 'unstylable' for security reasons; namely
ensuring the user is aware of what they're doing.
Did you search first?
http://www.google.com/search?q=CSS+input+type%3D%22file%22start=0ie=utf-8oe=utf-8client=firefox-arls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
The first result is about as
On 1/24/06, Peter Levan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Without the MIME type set the file displays like a text file in the browser
window, however we want the download requestor to appear when accessing a
file of this type as the file is useless when viewed as straight text as it
is a data file
Best new bit of knowledge for me in 2005?
XSL.
If you know and enjoy using CSS, dive into XSL; it'll rock your world :)
hoping everyone has a safe and happy holiday season,
Andrew.
On 12/19/05, Terrence Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how would/do you markup the source attribution for data tables when there
is already a caption?
How about using the tfoot element? You could code it as:
table
thead
tr
thSummary of Key
On 10/17/05, Mordechai Peller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the best books on JavaScript is: JavaScript: The Definitive
Guide, by David Flanagan (O'Reilly Associates, Inc.)
Couldn't agree more. A fantastic reference manual that will remain on
my desk for years to come.
Here's the complete
My sincerest apologies to the group regarding the links in my previous post.
Youthful naivety shines through once more :-o
Please keep any further abuse off-list; it's not relevant to the thread. :)
On 10/17/05, Mark Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Krespanis wrote:
Here's
On 10/9/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's totally irrelevant. If 2 days ago you knew your article was flawed
then why posting a link to it?
I only mentioned it because it was published exactly 365 days earlier
on a very similar topic (linking CSS to html files). I was amused
On 10/8/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry, but this doesn't make sense at all. Or is there an important
detail I'm missing? ;)
Yes, you're missing the part where this was written over 12 months ago
by someone who had only built 3 sites and wanted to try and help other
On 10/7/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate your feedback so I can improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/branching.asp
Sure, but I'm in a hurry so please excuse me if I'm a bit short with
my reponse :)
Congratulations! Now your file is ready for
: Andrew Krespanis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 7, 2005 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Say no to CSS hacks with branching techniques
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
On 10/7/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate your feedback so I can improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com
On 10/3/05, Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So... is there any way to define this relationship? Or is it just
order-of-content and hoping it makes sense? What if you were to put the
cite after the quote for whatever reason (style guide convention, etc)?
Sorry Josh, there's no attribute
On 9/28/05, Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:18:16 -0400, Joseph R. B. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
CSS solution: Put the flash movie into a div, then set the big
background image you'd use for the movie as the background image on the
div. Bang! Flash
I'm going.
Will be doing a little 'live-bloggin' on http://notinteractive.com/
and more professional coverage on http://leftjustified.net/
I'll be up there from Wednesday night and would be keen to catch up
with other WSG members for some warm up drinks :)
Photo:
EDIT: Whoops, that first URL should be http://notinteractive.wordpress.com/
I own notinteractive.com too, but I can't find the FTP details atm and
there's no redirect to the wordpress sub-domain...
Good thing I don't do this stuff for a living! Oh, wait a minute 0_o
On 9/27/05, Andrew
How about a secret password that you have to sneak into the first 60 seconds
of meeting someone :)..?
Or how about everyone interested just bites the bullet and posts their
photo contact details like I just did?
This secret handshake/signalling in crowded room nonsense isn't going to work.
On 9/8/05, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunno about that but I know of two silly alternatives:
A remote control device done in CSS:
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/remote/remote-new.htm
An IPod emulator:
http://www.podsites.com/emulator-result.cfm
...and if you
On 9/9/05, Paul Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
although I foresee browsing with that extension may be a version of hell for
many of us - can you imagine seeing the html errors for *every* page you
viewed?
I already see the HTML errors for every page I view [1].
The real nightmare is
On 9/9/05, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ideal would be that your markup can have divitis, but when parsed by a
screen reader or a printing device or something else, you tell it something
along the lines of:
div {
visibilty:hidden;
}
That will hide all child elements
On 9/8/05, Craig Rippon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have filed a formal complaint against the instructor (who happens to run 10
I am no longer attending his classes and may not get my Diploma.
Hi Craig,
Don't let it get you down, I went through exactly the same thing in
'03-'04 while attending
On 8/24/05, Bennie, Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know any neat code [JScript/CSS - not PHP] that can randomly
load a selection of images into the 'background-image' selector?
Should be simple. Merely dig up any decent image fade script and
replace the 'image swap' with this:
Aaaah, I over thought the situation -- I thought you wanted to *fade*
between the images, not just choose one at random...
Here you go :)
html
head
script
function randomBG(targetObjID) {
var obj, imgs, randNum;
obj = document.getElementById(targetObjID);
imgs = new
On 8/18/05, Bennie, Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got a simple one, but can't seem to get my head round it
I'm after a 2 column setup, one fixed width and the other fluid.
I'm pretty sure it's something simple, but it's the end of the day and I
can't spot it! Any ideas? I need to keep
Sorry for the double post, merely a quick clarification :)
There's a much better term for it in the spec, but alas I'm
not in the mood for spec. trawling at the moment
The proper explaination is that floated elements without an intrinsic
width[1] must have one declared in CSS.
For a
Hey mate :)
Interesting question, I think this one comes down to the dev environment...
If you're the only person who will be working on this (ie: it's a
personal project) then using what you've got and adding an informative
comment would be enough.
On the other hand, if I saw this at work I
That is exactly what I was thinking of. Do you know what the support is for
this statement?
Support for page break control via CSS is pathetic, especially if your
trying to set orphan/widow rules.
Spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/page.html
-Andrew
--
On 8/2/05, Ben Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good catch. Now we're talking a good excuse for regular expressions.
Instead of my recommendation of:
a[i].getAttribute('href').toUpperCase().indexOf(HTTP://) == 0
...I now recommend:
Thanks for clearing that up Ben!
Always glad to be told I'm wrong if I can walk away from it having
learnt something ;)
Cheers,
Andrew.
On 8/3/05, Ben Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is outdated information, apparently. I had heard the same, and
was curious if things had changed since
1. Maybe use search instead of query as a label for the search form.
Maybe use Find instead of search or query (then again, your target
audience is developers, so query is part of their vocab). 'Search'
suggests that a 'hunt and peck/ hit and miss activity will follow.
More important than that
Whooa nelly!
!important -- not adding a 'for' attribute kills half the purpose of
using a label 0_o
Without a for attrib, clicking the label will not affect
(focus/activate) the input element nested within. This is especially
important in the case of checkboxes and radio buttons as the
On 7/30/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you ought to check specifically that 'http://' is at the
beginning of the string.
Good point, I'll change this.
A more reusable approach would be to check for '://', as this is what
differentiates 'mailto:', relative paths and
Something similar to this came up at work last week and I think it
would be good to tack it on to this thread (hopefully there's enough
relevance!).
The problem was that we wanted to handle links to non-html files in a
different manner than regular links. Ideally, it shouldn't require any
more
what are you guys using as a base css file to start a site with common hacks
and what not?
plug http://leftjustified.net/journal/2004/10/07/css-negotiation/ /plug
and
plug http://leftjustified.net/journal/2004/10/19/global-ws-reset/ /plug
Couldn't help myself ;)
Andrew.
Video is still in the works. We'll probably be looking for volunteers
later on to help us caption the sucker...
We've just got to wait for the AV team to have some spare time to
digitise it so I can take it home and edit it into something worthy of
upload (Don't worry Ben, I'll overdub you with
Other fixes for this problem are as follows:
li { position:relative; }
li { height:1%; }
li { zoom:1.0; }
Applying borders may also fix the problem, I haven't tested that one
as it's a bad solution anyway -- changing the design to fix a bug
isn't cool at all; plus IE can't handle transparent
On this topic, I've recently picked up a copy or 'Javascript -- The
Definitive Guide' published by O'Reilly. This book came highly
recommended to me by the best scripters I know.
Having read the first 220 pages over the weekend, I can honestly say
that it will have a place on my desk whenever I'm
If all goes to plan (and it has so far), this tuesday's Brisbane WSG
meeting will be filmed with the intention of offering it up for WSG
members.
If anyone wants to volunteer to do the captioning that would be
awesome, otherwise some of the locals will probably draw straws for
it... (don't be
Heh, well if the blockquote approach is considered overkill, you'll
choke on what I actually use for my comments...
ol
li
dl
dtAndrew said:/dt
ddpThis is my comment. It is the definition of 'Andrew
said' within this context./p/dd
/dl
dl class=date
dtComment
Either these guys did the design, or your old employers stole their
'standards' page directly from here:
http://www.figdesign.com/site.html
I love running corporate standards BS through Google -- then you can
see where it really came from ;)
Andrew.
On 5/24/05, Ben Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dl class=postalAddress
dtCanada/dt
dd class=companyIn The Game, Inc./dd
dd class=divisionCustomer Service/dd
dd class=street1135 West Beaver Creek Road Box #604/dd
dd class=cityRichmond Hill/dd
I was wondering whether it is better to use the import command in the main
style sheet and import the other style sheets that way or to have multiple
link hrefs to stylesheets or whether it makes no difference how you do it.
@import will stop working at 2 levels deep (an @imported stylesheet
On 5/9/05, john [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
create a link that says hide content and it will remove a section
of text from the
page. The layout uses some tables (XHTML Transitional), so it would
have to hide three tr's and shift the content below it up.
Can somebody please instruct me on a
Ooops! I really shouldn't leave things half-baked like that.
If the link in question doesn't do anything without javascript, it is
a wise idea to have it written to the page using js as well.
We don't want any orphan UI elements, do we ;)
And I even tested this one :]
//let the code
David R wrote:
Suppose you have a div element and give it 5 background images and a
background color:
[...]
...Wouldn't the background colour of the element show through the
transparency of the image, thus rendering any round-corner images using
transparency useless?
Yes, that is my
Too late, it's already in there:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-background-20050216/#the-background-image
Most of the modules are at working draft stage, see the lot here:
http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work
Andrew.
http://leftjustified.net/
On Wed, 16
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:21:58 -, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No... he used word compatibility,
which means that all bugs must remain untouched.
Here's a quote from the press release:
Internet Explorer 7.0, designed to add new levels of security to
Windows XP SP2 while
Buh?
Try position:relative;
Wild guess, but always worth a try
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:02:28 +1000, Josh McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, I've managed to somehow get an unclickable text field in
explorer. It's in a float:right div, and unfloating the div fixes the
problem, but I've had
note to all: IF IN DOUBT, add position:relative; -- it fixes many,
many IE bugs :)
Would it be excessive or treacherous to declare for Win IE:
* html * { position:relative; }
Yes, I think so. One instance I can think of is that links within a
scrolling div will not scroll (in
Web Essentials will definitely be on again. Russ, Peter Maxine and I
are working hard to put together an even better event this year.
Best. News. Ever (well, not quite, but close ;)
Excuse me while I dance around the office like a complete idiot..
Can't wait to see the line-up,
Andrew.
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:31:48 -0600, Mani Sheriar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The H1 for the first article (at the top left) does not display in IE.
It does not show up at all, even though the code is exactly the same as
it is for the following two articles. What shows up is just blank white
Well, that was interesting...
It would seem after spending most of the time discussing how to get
around IE's bugs, IE got its revenge by failing to load an integral
part of the design.
To those who attended: the problem is solved now, I've removed the old
min-max script and put in Dean Edward's
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:35:14 +1000, Josh McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Secondly - I consider myself fairly well versed in the voodoo that is
javascript, but what in the flamin hell is that IE7 script? I got
halfway down the thing adding spacing and indentation in the hope it
would become
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 07:06:21 +0100, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your code is compliant then just about every browser out there will be
able to generate
it with a 90% accuracy regarding design and 100% accuracy regarding content.
What kind of make believe web do you design for? Every
OOPS! I just swore on list
SORRY :)
http://leftjustified.net/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the
Well I suggest you name names and show examples of compliant html 4.01 that
doesn't show 100% of the intented content and doesn't at least resemble like
what you intented.
Compliant html pages styled completely with CSS displaying bugs? Easy,
I would make some examples for you now if I wasn't
You need to clear your floats.
Check this: http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html
(technique discovered by WSG member Tony Aslett ;)
Andrew.
--
http://leftjustified.net/
**
The discussion list for
a:visited:hover {
...styles...
}
OR
a:visited::hover { ... }
(double colon is CSS3 syntax)
Untested, but theoretically it should work...
Andrew.
http://leftjustified.net/
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 18:40:34 -0800, Andreas Boehmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was
Your problem occurs when you have the border-top: 0; after the border
statement.
Is this a Gecko bug, I wonder?
I doubt it, more likely that border-top:0; is incorrect use of the
shorthand property.
'border-top' is supposed to receive 3 values, border-top-width is what
you would use to set the
While you could just nest the iframe in the object as fallback (is
that valid nesting? Unsure about iframes..), fallback content often
doesn't work due to users having the flash plugin but having flash
content blocked by a browser plugin.
Another way to do it would be to use a flash detection
Your :hover changes on menus create a contrast shift that is far too small.
In short, make the :hover background lighter and text darker so we can
still read the menu :)
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:21:31 +1100, Brendan Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings all,
I'm currently working on a web
Try this:
ul.sm_menu li {
position:relative;
}
I had the same problem on greatpikespeakbirdingtrail.org, and that was the fix.
The dissapearing BG bug is another one from the 'hasLayout' family. I
HATE hasLayout, it is IE's worst feature
Andrew.
Hi group :)
The proposed presentation for the February meeting is some of the
technical aspects of CSS a title invented by the good people at WSG
to account for my slackness ;)
The presentation I will be giving is Site in an Hour Studying the
workflow of CSS development. I will be presenting
For min/max width/height in IE5+, I use this:
http://www.doxdesk.com/software/js/minmax.html
It's simple, it works, what more could you ask for?
Andrew.
http://leftjustified.net/
**
The discussion list for
Simply remove the !important. If both selectors have the same
specifity, the last one in the source order (or last to be imported)
will (*should*) take precedence.
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 08:33:03 +0200, Jacobus van Niekerk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody have a solution for the following:
I
I remember reading a quote from a Google tech. stating that while
their system is capable of reading/interpreting CSS, they don't do so
due to the excess load it would create.
I also remember the same quote mentioning something about sites only
getting penalised if someone lodges a complaint
object src=http://www.yourdomain.tld/audio/your.snd;
type=MIME/GoesHere /
...Thats only from the top of my head, you'll have to check to see if it
works, of course, but that should work in browsers that interpret the
object tag appropriatley
Browsers that interpret the object tag
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:51:35 -0330, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a template that I have created and am creating all my pages from
that. I have named this file x.html but when I try and rename it to
x.php, because I have some dynamic content on it, nothing displays. Any
ideas why this
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:47:53 -0200, Bruno Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you can hide the css from it also using
link, providing two media types separated bya a comma and a space:
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=style.css media=screen,
projection /
Sorry for being anal, but
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:08:53 +0100, JohnyB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a span { display: block; text-indent: -999em; }
is this safe? (won't it bring some scrollbars somehow etc.?)
I've never gotten that technique to work properly in Opera. It always either
a) makes scrollbars
b) displays
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 23:12:57 +, Patrick H. Lauke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most correct way (tm):
form action=... method=...
fieldset
legendSearch Club Listings/legend
label for=nameName of club/label
input type=text name=name id=name /
label
Hi all :)
I'm going to be the speaker for the Feb 9th WSG meeting in Brisbane
and I am undecided between two possible topics. Take a look at the two
options and let me know your preference. You can let me know off list
if you prefer.
option 1.
Safely Hacking CSS Making sites that work now and
Don't think this has been mentioned anywhere yet, but one issue I
found with
this, was that within dropdowns the downarrow GUI, covers some of
the text
on the right. Here is the fix for that:
option {
padding-right:1em;
}
Indeed, that is an issue, but to my understanding
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:03:58 +, Andy Budd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IE5 has a bug that can put extra space between list items. Setting the
li to be inline fixes this issue.
Setting height:1%; also fixes that bug.
Zoom:1.0; fixes the bug in IE 5.5 and 6, but not 5.0 (plus it's
invalid
http://www.w3.org/2003/12/semantic-extractor.html
Great tool
Absolutely, but with a major flaw (imho)
It completely ignores tables, period. If I point it at my homepage
(leftjustified.net), it gives a good outline of the page but makes no
mention of the well structured, correctly labelled data
I am trying to have an unordered list that is styled nicely with an arrow
graphic, however now I get the arrow graphic in my ordered list as well.
Descendant selectors are your friend...
.mainleft ul li {
padding: 0px 0px 0px 25px;
background: url(images/bullet.gif) no-repeat
Whoops, should have read your code a bit more before hitting 'send'
Making the following change will give you better support in IE and
Opera while also keeping the arrow centered regardless of font-size -
.mainleft ul li {
padding: 0px 0px 0px 25px;
background:transparent
Hmmm
This may sound insane, but if the style element is adding whitespace, try
style {
display:none;
}
in the IE 5.0 styles.
If that stops the style element from working (?), try height:1px;
I've never heard of this before, but my suggestion could be worth a try...
I'm guessing you're
Tricia Fitzgerald wrote:
Does anyone know of a whimsical font that works in all browsers? I've
tried Kidprint but that does
not work on any of the Mac browsers nor AOL on the pc.
font-family: fantasy; --- guaranteed to be 'whimsical' on any browser...
...and also very nasty (think 'Comic
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:07:32 +1000, Barry Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
didn't I read somewhere that the next IE browser will be with the next OS
(longhorn) in 2006?
anyone confirm that?
cheers
barry.b
G'day Barry ;D
That's the official word; though your 2006 delivery date is a bit
Aaah, the accessibility validators chestnut... I'm surprised Patrick
and Derek and haven't dropped in on this thread yet ;)
Unfortunately machines can't check for accessiblity. Really, they can't.
Until they do checks like rendering pages and making sure link targets
aren't incredibly small, (eg:
I dig all the changes so far :D
Good work Patrick, and congrats on getting an 'A-list blogger' as a client!
Andrew.
http://leftjustified.net/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
' ' is CSS for 'child of'. In this instance - html#wrap - it means
any element with an id of 'wrap' that is a child of the html element.
The reason they've used it here is probably because IE does not
understand that selector, so it will ignore the rule.
Hope that cleared it up a bit for you :)
' ' is CSS for 'child of'. In this instance - html#wrap - it means
any element with an id of 'wrap' that is a child of the html element.
The reason they've used it here is probably because IE does not
understand that selector, so it will ignore the rule.
Hope that cleared it up a bit for you :)
Try and float just #contentLeft or #contentRight, but not both.
There's nothing wrong with floating all your columns. In fact, I
always float both columns as I find it more reliable than using
margins/padding to clear adjacent cols.
This article will solve your problem. Apply the hack to your
OT: Does anyone else think the Garden needs some sort of rating system
or better categorisation? When there was only ~30 it was fine. But now
there's ~520. A lot will never get seen, and that probably includes some
really good examples that should be.
[also OT]
What the garden really needs
You say you want the first line smaller than the second, but your css
will do exactly the opposite (once the selectors are fixed):
.pmi {
font-size: 1.5em;
}
.pmi p:first-line {
font-size: 1.2em;
}
Let me explain; if your default font size is 10px (it's not, but this
is just an eg.),
I know I'm way out on a limb with this one, but the ocean thing really
doesn't do anything for me... The diver/flashlight effect is cool
(even though it looks a bit nasty as it goes over the gradient) and
the rendered ocean floor has really nice lighting, but besides that...
Comments like I'm not
It is that sense of seeing art at the cutting-edge of science that makes us
go wow.
Good point John, I can't argue with that :) The backgrounds are great,
the css is cutting edge. That doesn't make it a great design though.
Could the people who think it is so non-wow, please explain to us in
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 10:19 AM, Patrick Lauke wrote:
And you can group the above and save yourself repetition. In one
of my stylesheets, for instance, I have
#navbar li a:focus,
#navbar li a:hover,
#navbar a:active {
background: #fbfbfb;
}
I seem to recall Tommy
Hmm...it doesn't seem to affect IE 5 or 5.5 (admittedly using skyx' multiple
IE installations on a Win2k machine natively running 6) on
www.salford.ac.uk
though. Maybe just depends on a variety of factors, not sure...
Hmmm indeed ;)
When I get home from work I'll find the exact bug and link
ot
John's interview proved what Doug Bowman stated in an earlier blog
post - You can't speak to an Australian without them bringing up a
Simpsons quote
Now that I know where the name came from, my stomach will turn every
time I visit your site :)
Andrew.
I like it :) Easy to read, I found items of interest quickly, all good
from that side.
Two small problems though -- the ultra wide search input looks bad as
it overhangs the sidebar at anything more than 75% text-size (Moz1.7)
Also, the bottom radii of the sidebar are messy -- the curves have
Thanks for the free copy of Style Master! :D
I've never been a fan of web design IDEs, but I'm sure going to give
this one a good run for its money.
Thanks again,
Andrew.
--
http://leftjustified.net/
**
The discussion list for
Another is to add a 1px border of the same colour as the container - depends
on your need.
Or even
border:1px solid transparent;
Andrew
http://leftjustified.net/
**
The discussion list for
Out of curiosity: what's your stand to the 216 web colours? Do you stick
with them or do you go the full 16 bits?
Honest answer - WHAT? your monitor only supports 216 colours??!
Hahahaaa... 16.7 million too much to handle? ;)
Half decent answer - It's a bit like making sure all is well at
Nothing new for list members, but I've added another post to discuss
some of the issues that this thread has bought to my attention.
http://leftjustified.net/journal/2004/10/19/global-ws-reset/
Andrew.
**
The discussion list for
Hi all,
I guess I should add my 2 cents as well :)
re: Russ' comments --
1. Once you have removed all margin and padding, this method relies on you
specifically styling the margins and padding of each HTML element that you
intend to use. On smaller sites where you may only need to style
http://www.astraroger.ro . Please take a look at it and tell me what
you think. Don't be shy. :)
Quick points:
this (spaces using nbsp;):
lia href=/despre/istorie/ id=m01 nbsp; nbsp; Istorie/a/li
lia href=/despre/echipa/ id=m02 nbsp; nbsp; Echipa/a/li
lia href=/despre/avantaje/ id=m03 nbsp;
IE 6 supports the dotted style - so long as the border width is above 2px.
...which totally sucks, because 1px dotted is nice ;)
http://leftjustified.net/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
** EDIT from above: It would seem that as of August 11th they have
altered it to include images from CSS... This is one of those times
I'm really glad I'm wrong :o
As for home testing... Could you include some form of timestamp using
php and then a javascvript onload function to work out the time
I just got lost in the web of dated documents.
Andrew Krespanis
http://leftjustified.net/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
