Nick
Do you have a URL?
Cheers
James
Nick Lo wrote:
Hello all,
Ok this is my first fully CSS based site
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to
Peter
Sounds like a trip on the Magical Mystery Whitespace Tour (sponsored by
Microsoft). I had this problem while back with a nested list, threw
things at the screen in the end to try and fix it. Luckily calmness
(counted to 32768 backwards) prevailed and I ended up rejigging the
complete
Hey
Off the top of my head:
# cc9900 = #c90
# cc8800 = #c80
# dd2255 = #d25
Just take the 1,3 5 characters of the string.
If the 6 chr hex is not paired then this
#e6dfe2 as #ede will be the same as #eeddee
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/syndata.html#color-units
Cheers
James
theGrafixGuy wrote:
Hi
I wonder what the disabled would have to say about that. The very word
disabled is a label stuck on people that a society deem to be deficient
in some way, sourced from the term bad ability' - it's a disabling effect.
I'd hate to be called a lever, it would be very disabling. And of
course,
Hi
Use the :first-letter pseudo thingo to do this, but I doubt it works in
Winternet Explorer (please prove me wrong).
CSS2 Recommendation section 5.12.2
Cheers
James
Leo J. O'Campo wrote:
Make a class that will position and size according to line height and
then use a span element. That's
Hi Michael
With that OS someone could log into his computer and upgrade for him... :D
Seriously, though, you do have three paths here :
1. Push IE6
2. Make it work in IE5. It may be simple, I have a feeling it is this :
font-size : smaller;
Try small as a starter. I've been tooling with body
Hi
Remember, an inline element will collapse over linebreaks and cannot
have block level elements inside it.
Cheers
James
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This email is to be read subject to the disclaimer below.
Hi Sam,
*
The discussion list
Hi Susan
There's been a lot of talk here about skip links, recently I tried to
use some of the information in a live beta of the new Sydney PHP Group
site (http://sydney.ug.php.net).
Basically I went for skip links that would be useful to all visitors
I have tho' been looking at aural
Felix
This looks to generated from Outlook Express - it hasn't been sent by a
list member.
(The guidelines http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm suggest
that everyone uses plain text to send email.)
You may also be having some trouble rendering the messages with the mail
client
Hi Justin
Support for Safari would be more appropiate on a Mac users list. Posts
about how Safari supports the relevant standards are ok.
Cheers
James
Justin French wrote:
Just upgraded to OS X 10.3 from 10.2 last night, and whilst some of the
new features in Safari are nice, I still need the
Hi James
The legend tag is most useful for grouping fieldset sections of forms,
the label tag describes only one input element.
I've put this to use on sydney.ug.php.net
form
fieldset
legend/legend
labelinput //label
/fieldset
fieldset
legend/legend
labelinput //label
labelinput //label
HI Sam
Do you have a URL? Maybe there is another way to do this that could be
helped along with something visual.
Cheers
James
Sam Walker wrote:
Yes, I notice that now that I try it with more content. Perhaps there'
another way without so many problems?
On Apr 3, 2004, at 6:23 PM, Tim Shortt
Hi all
In a few threads here it's been mentioned there are three types of
stylesheets:
1. User
2. Author
3. Browser
If you are interested in the third one then you should delve into the
/res/ directory of Firefox to have a look at how the default rendering
style is set up for that browser
Adam
I've done this for our users - both a stacked horizontal bar graph and
stacked vertical bar graph. It works across *all* useful browsers
(including IE5+) funnily enough and is very simple to do.
To see it and the markup you'll have to join up with SpamTrap as it's
not in a public area.
Hi all
Just a quick reminder that the guidelines for the list are at
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm - one of these includes
a no attachments policy. If you want to send a screenshot to someone
please do it off list - I'm pretty sure Peter doesn't want to send out a
345 kb
Hi
Looking at the code (from source URL below)
object classid=clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-44455354
codebase=http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0;
width=300 height=120
param name=movie
scott parsons wrote:
For some things the lack of streaming can be very restrictive as there
are several things you cannot do with a loaded movie. Sure modularising
the movie is a good plan, but there are times that you need access to
that root level of the movie.
Not that this is a Flash
support object? [3] or just use Drew Mclellan's solution? Also I ask
the same confirmation question as P.
Leo
On Tuesday, April 13, 2004, at 07:43 AM, James Ellis wrote:
Hi
Looking at the code (from source URL below)
object classid=clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-44455354
Nice one
It's great to see such a large site being discussed openly on the list.
Other than what has been discussed, the only I thing I can see is the
markup:
p class=standardsNote
strongNote:/strong You are reading this message either because you can not see
our css files, or because you do
Umm off the top of my head you could try overflow : auto;
HTH
Cheers
James
theGrafixGuy wrote:
What is the recommended replacement when using a textarea?
Thanks
Brian
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Andy
Some links:
(not meaning to beat my drum, but..)
http://www.sitepoint.com/articlelist/300
and...
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay/
and...
http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1081798064count=1
HTH
James
Andy Clarke wrote:
Comrades
It's not very often I fire up Flash, but today has
Yeah, taxidermy's the best option for them ... the NS4 people who have
raised your site is broken with me upgraded to Net 7. Ooh it works.
That said, I did have a user complain that the site was slow on their
2.4 kb modem the other day, truly. I thought about buying a 56k modem
for them.
Chris
It's just the way the browser's put together their widgets - try to do
the most minimal styling on widgets anyway, take a look at Safari, or
input type=file and you'll see what I mean :D
There's no such thing as pixel perfect on the web, unless your page is a
bitmap.
Cheers
James
Chris
Hi all
I have no idea what an Org chart is but I guess we are talking about
graphing or tree views of some sort. I've done some cool stacked bar
graphs in CSS with inline style - but I provide a plain text version as
well (given that I use red and green on the bars).
Peter F's question asked
Simon
Yes, but comments are for comments and not code. If we start putting
comments in to a script/markup that start to look like code to another
piece of software we'll have to stop using comments. Just another piece
of Microsoft stupidity to break the distinction between code and comments.
1. I have a multi-column layout... when I psuh the site to a layout for
handheld I'll turn off the floats that handle the columns. The content
will then cascade down the page. This will involve adding a new
stylesheet and linking to it via a media attr, a user agent sniff or a
hyperlink for
degree of
cross browser compatibility, ill do my best to convince them but in the
end its their choice
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development IT consultancy
James Ellis wrote:
1. I have a multi-column layout... when I psuh the site to a layout for
handheld I'll turn off the floats
to go the Nth degree of
cross browser compatibility, ill do my best to convince them but in the
end its their choice
-- Neerav Bhatt http://www.bhatt.id.au Web Development IT consultancy
James Ellis wrote:
1. I have a multi-column layout... when I psuh the site to a layout for
handheld I'll turn
some clients are not willing for you to go the Nth degree of
cross browser compatibility, ill do my best to convince them but in
the end its their choice
-- Neerav Bhatt http://www.bhatt.id.au Web Development IT
consultancy James Ellis wrote:
1. I have a multi-column layout... when I psuh
Hi
Surely a .net developer can write their own function to output compliant
markup? seems strange that a language forces someone to use inbuilt modules.
Cheers
James
SomeNewKid wrote:
The ASP.NET framework does not produce standards compliant XHTML. Hence, no
off-the-shelf forum component for
IE 5 Mac or Windows?
Cheers
James
Alan Milnes wrote:
I'll agree on the W3C icons. A grey or blue would be a better fit for
the site. Also need to specify a style for the hover on those images,
ridding them of the back background.
Thanks.
I have now downloaded the old IE Browsers and
Bert
Works for me in Mozilla 1.7 and Firefox. My OS is Fedora.
As for tables, use them for tabular data, not presentation. cells can't
exist outside their tables - boxes can be placed anywhere on the page
allowing you to completely separate the presentation logic from the content.
Try picking
ul { list-style-type : none }
Cheers
James
simon wrote:
Hi guys ,,
I have contructed this navigation bar --
http://simondodson.com/nav2.html and im having trouble removing the
bullet points from the list ...
any help would be great !!!.
Cheers
Simon Dodson
Hi all
Having some problems with a site that is crashing IE5 on the Mac (OS8 to
X). The code is moving towards HTML4 compliance with only a few
character errors, tag ends i.e instead of /' , and one id clash
left to fix.
I tested the site and it works perfectly on :
IE5.5, 6 for Windows.
Geoff
Given that, from what I've seen of SVG, it's markup based - so I'm
assuming that one could apply some XSLT to it and create a plain text
version of it for those who can't navigate a SWF.
The same thing could be done with Flash if you were to pull the data
from an external data source -
Hi all
Great to see an article in this weekend's Icon promoting the modern
browser, with a few salient words about our popular friend.
Link
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/04/30/1083224574998.html
This thread is not a discussion on browser merits but is about promoting
the tools that
Hi
Following on from this, it's the kind of thing a Web Standards Group
whitepaper could help with - drawing on everyone's collective knowledge.
..or a press release... coming after the Australian Gov's $4 million IT
dept website fiasco last year, it may be picked up by a few outlets.
Ideas?
Hi all
Great to see an article in this weekend's Icon promoting the modern
browser, with a few salient words about our popular friend.
Link
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/04/30/1083224574998.html
This thread is not a discussion on browser merits but is about promoting
the tools that
Kay Smoljak wrote:
James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
That said, I *will* try, as it is the only useful browser for OS8 - 9,
apart from Mozilla 1.0x from 2002.
I convinced a client on OS9 to upgrade from Netscape 4(!) to Netscape 7. I had
to hunt for it - the very latest version of Netscape
Nancy
Netscape7 is Mozilla, they are one and the same thing as they use the
same rendering engine (as do Firefox and Camino, the beta standalone
browsers) - you can safely incorporate the two into one group.
Cheers
James
Nancy Johnson wrote:
Dear Andy,
Side note question. What is a browsercam
Paul
Do you have a picture or URL? Then we can grok it in fullness.
Cheers
James
Paul Ingraham wrote:
Okay, you guys made good short work of my first simple css question, and it
was a great introduction to this list. Thank you all. Now it's time for
another!
I want a sidebar, and I've created
Justin French wrote:
My first reaction (after years of PHP scripting) was to escape it with
a slash:
input type='text' name='surname' value='O\'Riley' / -- doesn't work.
Adding to this - try htmlspecialchars() in PHP with ENT_QUOTES set -
this will special character all the XML reserved
Hi Todino
Welcome to the list.
Yes, it is far better to do validation on the server side because, with
JS turned off, you don't get any form validation.
Regarding the button to do the job, an input type=submit or input
type=image will do the job for you.
Remember:
1. When you submit an image
of the containing box width. Have
hidden this from IE5 Mac.
Site is at http://my.spamtrap.net.au/ - minor markup furphy in the login
form stopping validation but that is fixed for next version already.
feedback welcome (off list if it strays from the topic).
Cheers
James
James Ellis wrote:
Hi
Peter
See my thread the other day I tried this and it works fine.
#box
{
float : none - style for every browser
/* hack for IE5 mac \*/
float : left - for every browser bar IE5 mac (allows hiding styles
from IE5 Mac)
/* end hack */
}
So I guess you could do that around your whole stylesheet
Neerav
I think you have to look at a bigger issue here... is the time spent on
getting a page to work in IE4 actually worth the effort? Users of IE4
have an upgrade path to a better browser - the time spent assisting
these users to follow an upgrade path is more worthwhile than attempting
to
Hello all
I have started a new category on the WSG site call Development and
design tools. I think at this point it would be a good idea for
everyone to login and start listing all these programs on the WSG
website so that we can refer to these in the future, without having to
navigate thru a
Hi
Netscape 6 is not a stable browser, it's built off Mozilla alpha code
(i.e about 0.9) (v7 is a branch off Mozilla 1.1, I believe). There is a
thread on this topic about a month or two back with some links to the
Mozilla roadmap - try a search at mail-archive.com
The 6 was put in for
Hi
As I posted before, let's put these up on the WSG website, not on the
list. An archive would contribute better to the group and are the posts
are now tending to just take up bandwidth now on the list as we are just
getting a pile of emails with links in them.
Cheers
James
Jad Madi wrote:
This thread is now closed. Please put up your editors on the WSG website
in the category provided. I've provided instructions on how to do this
in a previous post.
regards
James
Michael Donnermeyer wrote:
On the Macs I usually use either Dreamweaver MX 2004 (code view) or
BBEdit 7.1 for all my
Heh..
I banged my head against the wall about this for while, then gave up and
went with the flow which got the application into production sooner.
Is an IE user going to be simultaneously viewing the same page in
Firefox or Mozilla or Opera? Bet you it's only web developers.
Wait till you see
Hi all
This would be better discussed on a place like the Sitepoint.com forums,
as it's about general web development. Having a discussion about where
you have sent screenshots is not for the list, it's for the person you
sent the screenshots to.
Cheers
James
Hi Alex
Try our resources section, you can add any editors you wish by logging in.
http://webstandardsgroup.org/go/resourcecat30.cfm
Cheers
James
alex 'fanatique' thomas wrote:
Hello everybody,
wow. second posting today but this one is more general. i'm looking for a
webstandard compatible
Hi
The portability of URI's is an important point here: as discussed, if a
web developer wants to move from X to Y server side language yet retain
the URL stucture then this is the way to go, in Apache it's just a
simple matter of telling it how to handle certain extension-less files.
That
Hi
Try hiding the CSS from this magnificent piece of software by using
the \*/ hack as outlined elsewhere in a thread here (try
mail-archive.com) - it's called the backslash hack, It's the only hack
I've employed as users on OS 8 and 9 have no upgrade path.
Does tend to bloat the CSS a tad as
Hanni
My opinion is don't bother, it's not worth the effort. Users still with
this browser should be pushed to upgrade for various reasons, not just
for the benefits of standards support they bring.
Any user who approaches me complaining about a site that doesn't work in
IE4, NN4, Opera 5 or
People,
Discussion of installation of Firefox is for http://www.mozillazine.org,
rather than here. Discussion of browser support for your pages is fine.
If you'd like to put the Web Developer extension (and similar) up on the
wsg site resources section then go for it.
Cheers
James
Hi all
To not lose these examples in a thread somewhere I have set up a
resource category on the website. As with code editors, please put your
recommended books up on the site in the category Offline resources
(books, magazines etc)
We can then refer back to this listing if the topic comes up
John
Whenever I've been forced to test IE5 Mac I've found it to be
unreasonably slow - the rendering engine is a dud compared to other
browsers. I'm sure it was cutting edge 3-5 years ago but not now.
Safari is much faster and better but it tends to have a pretty fierce
cache (like Opera), as I
Hi
Gecko based browsers have an extension called Small Screen Rendering.
Again, like the Opera SS rendering option it just passes the page
through a special stylesheet to emulate the screen res. It doesn't
emulate the various quirks of various handheld User Agents.
Peter -
The code tag is HTML 4, and represents 'computer code'-
http://htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/phrase/code.html
Quote:
The *CODE* element denotes /computer code/. Visual browsers typically
render *CODE* as monospaced text, but authors can suggest a rendering
using style sheets
Marc
Camino, like Firefox, is a beta release so it's going to have bugs in
it. You should lodge these bugs at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/, rather
than here and you'll get noticed by the Camino development team.
HTH
James
Marc Greenstock wrote:
Hi all,
I hope this isn't too OT but I have
Hi all
WCAG is on topic -please discuss all you want, but address the topic,
not the person. The list is here to provide a constructive discussion on
web standards and accessibility. If you want to be destructive or have a
beef with the author, don't do it here as your subscription will be
Hi Scott
Which version of Netscape..? This is important as with Netscape 4 you
are better off hiding the stylesheet. Netscape 6 is/was a dud so better
off pressing for an upgrade for the 1 % of users who use it.
If you are targeting Netscape 7 then the problem *should* (touch wood)
manifest
Hi
I do just this for a reseller based product. One set of markup styled
with CSS based on the client's 'look n feel' requirements. All done
with floats and works off the bat with all modern browsers and some
older ones like IE5.x for both platforms.
It took me a while to do it but once done I
Hi
I'd be interested in John Horner's comments on this, as he's a member of
this list. Given the ABC is a government organisation shouldn't they
really be fulfilling some requirements of the DDA?
I'd have thought making the feature image (Chris and Craig at the mo) a
non background image would
Gavin, Scott.
Try doing this:
http://www.webqs.com/experiment.php?id=15
apologies for the link links. I stopped working on my site ages ago
due to other work commitments.
I'm sure you can tweak it to output a markup page based on the insert
method name here method. Currently it allows you to
Hi Ted, all
Title attributes don't have to pop up in a tooltip, that's up to the
user agent. I'd suggest you do something like this...
label for=arrivaldateYour arrival date at Hotel WSGlabel
Also, user of fieldsets allow to you to control the appearance of
different parts of a form:
fieldset
Hi Ted
I've steered clear of access keys as they cause some problems on Safari
etc. After seeing a screen reader in action at a previous WSG meeting in
Sydney there are some much better ways it has to directly access content
on a page (e.g list links, list headings etc).
Cheers
James
Ted Drake
Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
I know that some other browsers like Firefox might not work without
the embed code,
*
Olajide
Firefox, Mozilla, Opera 7 et al actually support the object tag far
better than Internet Explorer for Windows. It's a
Neerav
It depends on the version of khtml you are running... and there will
always be differences in the two, although slight. I believe Apple are
putting back some good css and markup support into the khtml development
project..
See : http://www.konqueror.org/developers/ and
Hello Chris
Glad to see you got what you are after and welcome to the WSG list.
Please remember to post all code, including a valid doctype, to a site
so we can use browsers to work out any quirks - email programs aren't
the best at rendering code and introduce their own quirks into the mix.
Jaime
I guess you are having the problem where IE Mac doesn't float your list
elements properly and they all go to 100% width down the page?
I did this to solve the problem.. you need to float the anchor to the
left as well.. it's the only hack I use:
#menu ul li
{
float : left;
Gavin
Do you have any code?
Cheers
James
Gavin Cooney wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a page that when someone tries to print it in IE 6 on
windows, it crashes the browser.
There's nothing fancy in it, and i've stripped it down so i know the
problem only happens when something is the second line of the
Hi
Unless there are some major benefits to Win IE's support of CSS (I doubt
it but please prove me wrong), the Web Standards Group list isn't the
best place to post information like this.
Cheers
James
Chris Stratford wrote:
Hey List,
Just letting you know XP SP2 is out now.
It says its not for
Peter Ottery wrote:
these are still linked. the actual (non graphic) heading is just using the
technique [1] of making the font size 1px and white (so its not visible on a
white page) leaving the background image visible. the link that contains the
heading is given a width height and
Hi
I have a feeling that the inconsistencies in valid xhtml markup for
embedding (object) Flash were from general badness in the ActiveX used
by Flash Player (somebody mentioned a corrupt OCX file on the Flash
Satay discussion at ALA) and Internet Explorer having it's own version
of the
Hi Marc, all
Anyone interested in this, please reply off list.
Thanks
James
Marc Greenstock wrote:
I know it's not common for this list to hold job postings although we are
really desperate to find someone here.
From: http://jobs.careerone.com.au/search/dsp_show_job.cfm?AD_ID=1235550
Shock Media
Hi Sarah
You could try this project at Mozdev.org - it's cross browser/platform
(Mac, Linux, Win32 - anything that runs Mozilla).
http://mozile.mozdev.org/
I had a go at it a few months ago, not sure how it would integrate with
a data store. Probably just a matter of POSTing content to a server
One quick question about Quicktime - my colleague said Quicktime is a
Bad Idea because the file sizes are big and it doesn't have a big
installed base... is this a good enough reason not to use it?
Vicki
That's an opinion from a distinctly Windows perspective. It would be
interesting to see
Hi all
This has been discussed ad nauseam previously on the list. Their is a
resource category on the site created just for this topic so that all
members can have quick access to available editors and add new ones.
http://webstandardsgroup.org/resources/#cat30
Please feel free to log in at the
Amit
It's a list of information for the user. You can use floats to turn
on/off horizontal/vertical display of the list. You'll have much more
control over the list display than with a br
Also, you should move the pipes within an li tag or use the li or a
border to act as the delimiter so a
Hi all
Just a heads up for all of you trying to move to standards compliant,
accessible code - there's a new extension at Mozilla update called HTML
validator with Tidy. This gets triggered when you view the source of a
page in Firefox, reporting errors and there is an option to Tidy your
page
Suzanne
As a guide, and this has helped others in the past with the same problems:
1. Develop for a standards compliant browser such as Mozilla or Opera 7,
then make the necessary tweaks to get IE playing nice.
2. Make sure your CSS and HTML is compliant by validating at the w3c
3. Post some
David McKinnon wrote:
I've used Ian Hixie's method, because it seems to be the least problematic.
David
One of the central tenets of good coding is that comments are for
comments, code is for code. It's bad practice to put code into comments.
Comments should not be interpreted by any software,
Mordechai Peller wrote:
Lea de Groot wrote:
Yes, speculation is useless.
One of my clients, for the month of August shows the follow figures
in their logs:
Count | % of screen used by window snip /
Interesting, but you're missing a critical piece of data. Without
knowing what their
Hi all
As per Russ' request this thread is now closed. There is a category for
development and design tools on the WSG website which as WSG members you
are all welcome to use and update.
This thread is being closed because it has been discussed at least three
times already in pretty lengthy
Chris
That's true if you look at it from a rigid grid layout point of view. In
this case the programs aren't tabular data, additionally if you wanted
to represent the 4 programs in another visual format using css only then
this wouldn't be possible with a table layout.
My suggestion would be
Hi
Looks like it's Mac IE 5 day today...
Has anyone experienced this before? Mac IE 5.x user hits a page with a
login form. When they tab to the form field and type in their details
two characters appear for every one typed.
If the user clicks in the field with their mouse the problem goes away.
Not sure about the * declaration but the 11 browsers intrigues me? What
joe bloggs user out there looks at a website in 11 browsers? Broken to
us in Netscape 4 might mean works fine to the Netscape 4 user.
If one browser gives me 2px padding and another gives me 1px then I'm
not fussed as long
Mark
There are quite a few articles now in the mainstream media that expose
the Skoda like qualities of IE, maybe you should link to these? Sydney
Morning Herald ICON section quite regularly rates Opera and Moz as the
best available. PC User Australia had a big article Why you shouldn't
use IE
Offlist please, this has nothing do with the implementation of web
standards. Mozilla vs * discussions are best left for places like
mozillazine.org. Don't request to keep things like this on the list or
your account will be unsubscribed - that's not a threat, we are just
trying to keep this
is the 'value='
attribute, so maybe try adding that to the password field and see if it
makes any difference.
Kevin
On 28/9/04 1:17 PM, James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone experienced this before? Mac IE 5.x user hits a page with a
login form. When they tab to the form
Iain
You should direct your enquiry to the admins of that list. It's not
relevant to this list.
Regards
James
(admin)
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:24:14 +, Iain Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess that some people here will also be members of the Webaim
Discussion List. Well, I am - but
Hi
I use #9660; and #9650; as solid up/down arrows, works in everything
I can lay my hands on apart from a Palm handheld which renders a [?]
character or similar.
I wrap them in a span and set their font-size to ~ 150% in CSS.
There are some unicode links on the WSG resource section.
Cheers
Hi Ian
Webmail services have to be very strict about the HTML they display in
their pages. Basically a webmail service can be an attack vector for
all kinds of nasties - the actual box that displays the email contains
code unknown to the developers when they develop the site.
You may also find
Hi all
We've probably hit the nail on the head with this one, no more
responses to the list please as it's starting to move towards noise
and me-too responses.
How to's on handling mime types on servers should be directed to
discussion lists for that software
Admin cleanup:
Peter Tilbrook wrote:
[request for a 88x31px WSG button]
Get. A. Life.
This user has been removed. Do not do this on the list.
--
Hi
WSG mini icons designed by Ben Bishop (and many other resources) are found at
http://webstandardsgroup.org/icon/
This thread has now
Hi Jonathon
I suggest one or more of the following three options:
1 running the markup through Tidy - http://au.php.net/tidy
(You'll have to compile PHP with Tidy - more at link above).
2 using an HTML4.0 transitional doctype for the pages that display 3rd
party markup.
3 use strip_tags to
Hi all
This is a good discussion, lets try and keep it on how to apply the
mentioned software to create standards compliant content rather than a
rundown of its various features and comparison to other software.
Cheers
James
admin
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 13:41:42 +1100, Natalie Buxton
101 - 200 of 361 matches
Mail list logo
