Directed to standards aware developers in the SF Bay Area:
http://jobs.stanford.edu Job ID# 32035
...back to your regularly scheduled list-serve, already in progress.
Cheers!
JF
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.o
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> Unfortunately, top posting (or failing to quote at all) is often the
> result users of broken e-mail clients (usually Outlook or some web
> based mail). I find the best approach is to just set a good example,
> and hope that others eventually get the idea and/or switch mail
>
With apologies for cross posting.
Dear Friends,
For the many that know me, you will know that a post to any of the lists
I subscribe to on the topic of ACCESSKEY will automatically receive a
response from me. I think by now my position is abundantly clear on
this topic.
When I first heard that
Felix Miata wrote:
>
> No, it's not 16px. It's whatever size the user's browser default is
> set to. In most modern browsers, it just happens to start at 16px in
> most cases, but that is partly by accident, and is subject to user
> adjustment in multiple ways.
The W3C has specified 16px/96ppi
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
> From my personal perspective, Dreamweaver
> has a fantastic coding view similar to Homesite, with the additional
> features of FTP, CSS and Site Management.
Uhm... It *is* HomeSite, which Macromedia bought to add to their
Dreamweaver Suite (they also bou
Ingo Chao wrote:
> Rick Faaberg wrote:
>> Where do we draw the line on these sites?
>
> The reason why this did not happen before on the WSG mail list is
> because no poster before did have problems in drawing a line for
> himself.
>
> We should not change this unwritten agreement.
Please do no
Stuart Sherwood wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> If you pass all these test, does this exhaust all accessibility
>> issues or are there more?
>>
Stuart,
There are also the "soft" tests - often these deal with areas of
cognitive issues, from dyslexia to English as a second or third
language, etc. Consid
Patrick Haney wrote:
>> Internet Explorer cannot open the internet site http://
>> www.fifeweb.org/wp/events/evnt_ga_res_2005_01.html. Operation
>> aborted.
>>
>> It seems as if IE is striping off the #top fragment.
>>
>> Anyone know how to fix this?
>
> Bob,
>
Late to the party, but I cannot
Patrick Lauke wrote:
>> John Foliot - WATS.ca
>
>> There is no such thing as a stupid question (although
>> occasionally we will see stupid responses...)
>
> You tell 'em John :)
>
> P
As a point of clarification, when I say stupid responses, I mean
SunUp wrote:
> I do realise this is probably a very stupid question, and it's more
> than a little scary asking a stupid question on this list, but I'll
> wear the result if it means I can understand what I've done wrong.
>
> Thanks,
> sunny.
Goodness Sunny,
There really is no such thing as a st
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> Lea de Groot wrote:
>
>> The thead tag is the key -
>
> If you're using thead, you may as well go all the way and add a tbody
> as well...
>
>
>
>
> IDVar 1Var 2
>
>
>
>
> ID VALUE
> Va
Josh Rose wrote:
>
> What I'm trying to do is have the accesskey underlined, it works fine
> in Firefox and Opera (wayhey), but in IE 6 the a:first-letter works
> fine, but a:hover doesn't at all (it does without a:first-letter
> though) and in Netscape 7 the a:first-letter doesn't work at all
> (
Jeff D. Reid wrote:
> I joined this list well over two years ago. I have designed sites on
> my own utilizing tips and suggestions I have gathered from most
> people on the list and other lists. This is the FIRST time I have
> had my hands tied as to follow a Graphic Designer/Marketing "expert"
>
Kwok Ting Lee wrote:
> This is, I guess, one of the first times I've written anything here,
> but I've run into a bit of a dilemma and was hoping for some advice:
>
> 1. I have a number of analyses of poems I am planning on posting to
> my weblog over the next few months, however, I'm a bit stump
Conyers, Dwayne wrote:
> Leslie Riggs wrote:
>
>> "Following web standards is all well and good,
>> but how are you going to stream the audio when
>> you can't hear it, if you can't do it this?
>> How do you know your method will WORK?"
>
> Some people can be thick -- even when well-intentioned.
Nicola Rae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just to chip in, I am writing a couple of articles for GAWDS (guild of
> Accessible Web Designers) and have it on authority from them that the
> correct terms to use are:
>
> "In the UK - instead of 'users with disabilities' - it should be
> 'disabled users'.
>
> In t
16 matches
Mail list logo
