[WSG] .htm include file into another .htm

2006-01-18 Thread KJ Callender
Hi,

I want to include a file to be included into about 10 htm pages, and to
save time me updating them individually, i want to use a include file.

Using standards, which is the best way to achieve this:

1.   !--#include virtual=/included.htm --

2.   !--#include virtual=included.htm --

3.   !--#include file=included.html --

Any body have any experience of this?

thanks,

Jim




-- 
Kevin (Jim) Callender

http://www.jayonline.co.uk/

+44 (0)7888 701 588
+44 (0)1273 818 546

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] use for callender creates

2005-12-05 Thread KJ Callender
use for callender creates

-




 Donna,

 That's why I mention the measure thingy and industrial standards. I
 get the feeling that's something companies appreciate from a business
 point of view.

 Several of my coworkers and I recently gave a talk on when we chose to use
 Web standards (and when we didn't). We created a handout with some links
 to articles on using Web standards. Maybe one of the articles would be
 useful to you?

 Some of the reasons we chose to move to XHTML/CSS instead of table-based
 design:
 * Faster load-times.
 * Smaller page sizes. (One site I did went from CSS-P to a table-based
 template upon the customer's request, and the page sizes all tripled.)
 * Better accessibility.
 * Greater visibility in Web searches,
 * Better compatibility with browsers.
 * Future compatible with upcoming standards.

 I'll be happy to provide additional information if you like.

 Good luck with your situation.

 Kim Nylander

 --

 These are some of the articles we used in the handout. Maybe they would
 have something useful?

 Why Use Web Standards?

 Buy standards compliant Web sites (W3C QA article)
 http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/07/WebAgency-Requirements

 The Way Forward with Web Standards (MACCAWS)
 http://www.maccaws.org/kit/way-forward/

 What are Web Standards and Why Should I Use Them? (WaSP)
 http://www.webstandards.org/learn/faq/

 Web Standards Switch (W3C QA)
 http://www.w3.org/QA/2003/03/web-kit

 Using Standards

 Learn the Standards (WaSP)
 http://www.webstandards.org/learn/standards/

 What Every Web Site Owner Should Know About Standards: A Web Standards
 Primer (MACCAWS)
 http://www.maccaws.org/kit/primer/

 Making your website valid: a step by step guide. (W3C QA)
 http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/09/Step-by-step

 My Web Site is Standard. And yours? (W3C QA)
 http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/Web-Quality

 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **




-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] liquid widths

2005-12-03 Thread KJ Callender
You may want to check this in 800 x 600  you have horiz scroll bar. The
original doesn’t.

thanks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of kvnmcwebn
Sent: 03 December 2005 00:10
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] liquid widths

Im only starting to play around with liquid layouts.

I like this 3 column example that uses min widths.
For non-mozilla browsers it uses horizontal rules to set the min scaling of
the boxes.
It then hides these from browser that support min width, it seems a bit
reduntant to me but. 
 
http://www.saila.com/usage/layouts/saila_layout.html




Anyway i started modifying the layout to have a fixed width left column.
So far it looks allright in ff but im not sure about it because i set the 
widths visually and they dont really add up to 100%.
Is this ok?


http://www.mcmonagle.biz/finaloti/index3.html

http://www.mcmonagle.biz/finaloti/finalstyle.css


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.11/191 - Release Date: 02/12/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.11/191 - Release Date: 02/12/2005
 

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**