On 23 Jun 2005, at 11:35 PM, Lee Jorgensen wrote:
For example, a knowledge component might be Know how to Validate
pages using the W3C validation service, others could be might be
Know how to produce semantically correct code, Know the benefits of
using Web Standards, Positioning Page
On 21 Jun 2005, at 9:43 PM, Marcello Cerruti wrote:
I have the same strange problem that you can see on this Apple site
page:
http://guide.apple.com/index.lasso
If you look at the left side column with IE (Mac) or Firefox (Mac) the
font is different from the one that you can see on Safari,
On 12 Jun 2005, at 4:03 PM, Andrew Krespanis wrote:
I know the film quality will be bad because I'll probably end up
holding the camera; but who cares, we've got to start somewhere.
One word of encouragement: goodonya. And one of advice: tripod.
Looking forward to it!
N
On 19 May 2005, at 4:36 PM, Bruno Torres wrote:
Hello.
I'd appreciate mush if you take a look at my weblog
(http://www.brunotorres.net/) and tell me your opinions.
I did some changes in the layout and want to know if others like it as
I do.
I'd also like if mac users tested it on safari and
On 14 May 2005, at 8:02 AM, Lily Miu wrote:
Second is the name anchor I placed at the bottom of the page, it also
worked only on IE. For other browsers,
the anchor was going to the very bottom of the page instead of going
up.
Your 'top' link is contained within a div with id='top':
div id=top
On 12 May 2005, at 10:44 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Could be an Ooops.
No, not at all. Even if there's no CSS that references it, it provides
a hook if you *do* want to style that element individually later on...
I always give my nav links unique IDs for that purpose.
N
On 9 May 2005, at 6:07 PM, tee wrote:
[p/s. The reason I write you offlist is because I don't want WSG
moderator
post another 'no more discussion on this topic' reminder :) ]
Duh.
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 10 May 2005, at 3:26 AM, Chris Kennon wrote:
http://www.ckimedia.com/ep_site/index.htm
At the url listed is a solution for a large textured background,
against a gradient. Can someone offer a critique of this method, and
if possible another solution?
Using one large image as bgrd to
On 5 May 2005, at 8:30 PM, john wrote:
What I need is a site that shows the different fonts that are
recommended for web design. It would be nice if there were some kind
of PDF I can print, but I can also go to his office and show him
online if need be.
Google: web-safe fonts
N
On 4 May 2005, at 4:59 PM, Neerav wrote:
I believe you mean To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism to
steal from many is research :-)
In practical terms this means don't just copy sitepoints (or anyone
else's) code directly because this is neither ethical or legal and you
wont learn how
On 2 May 2005, at 4:41 PM, Neerav wrote:
Since this is Possibly OT
Possibly?!
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Ah - did you wait for the ad to load? It was slow coming for me, and
until it did, it *looked* like bad line wrapping - but was in fact
OK...
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
(Safari 1.3 / OS X 10.3.9)
On 24 Apr 2005, at 4:05 PM, Rick Faaberg
On 23 Apr 2005, at 8:53 PM, Lea de Groot wrote:
Wouldn't be a strange world if we didn't curse developing for IE?
'Scuse me if I don't hold me breath...
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
**
The
On 13 Apr 2005, at 1:16 PM, Zulema wrote:
ps: butterflies in my stomach means that my tummy gets grumbly as if
I'm hungry but it's from being nervous; it's a common saying in the
States. As far as it being an in-code joke? No, at least i don't
think so :-p
Uh - I know... but your original post
On 12 Apr 2005, at 12:35 PM, info wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to make a presentation to art students on an introduction to
web design and would like some advice (besides how to deal with the
butterfiles in the stomach).
Butterfiles. I love it. Is that a code in-joke?
Seriously, the other answerers
On 12 Apr 2005, at 3:39 PM, tee wrote:
What is the incentive for us to tell potential clients that web
standards is
important and how many people in this group successfully using web
standards
as selling point for their web design service. Do you increase your
ballpark
as a result?
I find this
On 7 Apr 2005, at 4:23 AM, Paul wrote:
Hi, Have a page that seems to be lining up fine everywhere I am
checking ( Opera, Firefox, IE ), validates fine but is a little off on
a MAC, seems like a margin is pushing the grey box in the middle,
towards the right. Sorry no screenshot but the page is
Bert is spot on. The horiz scrollbar disappears at 837 - 838 px wide,
inc chrome.
800px + 32px + 8px = 840px (assuming that 1em = 16px). QED.
What does 'full on' mean?
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 21 Mar 2005, at 1:19 PM, Chris Kennon
On 22 Mar 2005, at 1:38 AM, Chris Kennon wrote:
When the browser is at 1024 X 768, Safari 1.0.3 still renders a
horizontal scroll bar. Thanks for looking.
Ah. Then I'd say it's a bug in 1.0.3. I was checking in 1.2.4 / OS X
10.3.8.
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
On 12 Mar 2005, at 12:23 AM, Alan Trick wrote:
I was tying to use nodeType to make sure that a node was an element in
my javascript, but it wasn't working. Then when I did
alert(aNode.nodeType); I got undefined, I was really confused so I
tried alert(document.nodeType); and I got undefined
On 8 Mar 2005, at 12:08 AM, Chris Stratford wrote:
BTW forums are odd.
What is the CSS equivalent which closes all tags...
eg, you can have a table cell with this in it:
td
bTEST
/td
td
TEST
/td
only the 1st cell is BOLD...
Weird.
Not weird at all. Look up reference on 'correct nesting of tags' -
On 8 Mar 2005, at 11:12 AM, Darren Wood wrote:
I use the following bit of code that seems to validate fine (also -
lightweight):
script type=text/javascript
!--
emailE=('darr' + 'en' + '@' + 'webd' + 'eveloper.co.nz')
document.write('a href=mailto:' + emailE + '' + emailE + '/a')
//--
/script
On 8 Mar 2005, at 11:31 AM, Chris Stratford wrote:
It is GOOD because in a forum situation, I don't need to worry about
closing tags that people forget to.
Easier to code :)
Yeah, but your code won't validate...
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 5 Mar 2005, at 1:35 PM, Chris Stratford wrote:
My website - www.simplyrewarding.net looks great in FireFox.
Yet IE has this little bug:
http://www.simplyrewarding.net/media/ie_dumb.jpg
I am not sure WHICH bug it is, so I can fix it!
Any help??
I stopped looking as soon as I saw the custom DTD -
On 20 Jan 2005, at 4:19 AM, Chris Kennon wrote:
additional accessibility features for an audience with ... emotional
disabilities
Accessibility for the emotionally disabled? A new direction for WS?
What's next - accessibility for the mildly schizophrenic? Additional
features for chronic
On 20 Jan 2005, at 8:16 AM, Genau Junior wrote:
I would appreciate all comments and suggestions about interface,
design and usability standards.
The temporary address is:
http://meucarronovo.locaweb.com.br
Images in Noticias section are not loading - they're missing a leading
slash in the
On 20 Jan 2005, at 10:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question - is there any program or a way of converting all the file
names
to lower case without doing it manually?
BBEdit on Mac has case sensitive, sitewide search replace, and a
powerful pattern-matching tool within search using grep.
On 13 Jan 2005, at 8:35 AM, Charlie Barr wrote:
Hey gang, here's a question for you. I'm working on converting a page
location picker for our CMS from tables to something more
standards-compliant. I found something interesting I wanted more
information about:
On 3 Jan 2005, at 4:26 AM, Mani Sheriar wrote:
If anyone on a Mac cares to check this out for me and just report any
issues (or, hopefully, the lack of issues) and on what browser you
looked I would GREATLY appreciate it.
www.ManiSheriar.com/zengarden
Hi Mani
on OS X 10.3.7:
Safari 1.2.4 - OK;
On 21 Dec 2004, at 9:11 PM, Javier Leyba wrote:
How could I set table width to be a 90% of div width size ?
If I set a table width=90% it takes a 90% of whole page instead of
div...
How about
div#whatever table { margin: 0 10% ;}
But beware... some browsers (IE5Mac comes to mind) need the longhand
On 22 Dec 2004, at 8:10 AM, Anthony Timberlake wrote:
I do have one set of head, body and html tags.
I have validated my CSS and HTML.
Don't see how your HTML can validate. Adding a DOCTYPE of XHTML Strict
will not magically convert an HTML document to XHTML. The syntax of
your code is entirely
On 22 Dec 2004, at 9:04 AM, Anthony Timberlake wrote:
I am not new at this, just haven't done it for a while now. I thought
by being on this list, I could get the help I needed. I appologize if
I offended you.
I'm not in the least offended. But if you'd like help from this list
(and this advice
On 21 Dec 2004, at 3:44 PM, Jeffery Fernandez wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to get a Div to expand its height when the content grows.
Site development url is http://www.hotshot.com.au/dev/fpaa/
As you can see the middle colum has some extra content and it is not
forcing the increase of the height
On 15 Dec 2004, at 9:46 AM, John Allsopp wrote:
which has the higher specificity
h1 {}
or
h1, h2 {}
(don't worry about the order in the style sheet, just in an absolute
sense)
Relevant part of the CSS specification is here
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/cascade.html#specificity
FWIW, I think it is
On 15 Dec 2004, at 9:47 AM, Mordechai Peller wrote:
30 meg is pretty slow even with broadband.
Even with a T1 at maximum utilization it would take around 3 minutes;
slightly more than the recommended 8 seconds for a page load.
To apply the '8 second rule' to *every* page on the web is patently
On 7 Dec 2004, at 2:19 PM, Darren Wood wrote:
I get _very_ depressed when i see high profile[1] new zealand sites
completely drop the ball[2]...
So, jump in with irresistable proposals for redevelopment, and plan on
retiring early!
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
On 3 Dec 2004, at 10:47 PM, Sam Hutchinson wrote:
Version: 1.0.3 (v85.8) to be precise. Apparently.
Is this the latest version?
No, AFAIK the latest is 1.2.4 (v125.11) - at least that's what I have,
running on OS X 10.3.6. Version 1.0.x came with 10.1/10.2, and now that
I've upgraded to 10.3 I
On 4 Dec 2004, at 5:08 AM, maggie galbraith wrote:
url: http://www.esigma.com
Any feedback, suggestions etc are greatly appreciated!
In addition to Hugh's relevant comments, I notice that you're making
using of nbsp; and br / extensively as layout/presentation tools.
Using CSS to set
On 2 Dec 2004, at 9:19 PM, Phil Baines wrote:
web standards complaint sites
Cool. Is this for complaining about sites that aren't compliant?
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
**
The discussion list
On 3 Dec 2004, at 1:37 PM, The Man With His Guide Dog At The Tent Store
wrote:
I have a line of text placed in a p//p that I would like to
shrink. Can
I use small//small? if so, how?
I'd advise wrapping the text you want to shrink in a span, giving
that span a class or id, and contolling the
On 2 Dec 2004, at 1:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just want to get some feedback about aesthetics and design on my
site if possible please and also the funcionality. Yes it is designed
in tables but still I would like some criticism please.
J.LinasDesign
Graphic Designer
On 2 Dec 2004, at 4:42 PM, Cook, Graham R wrote:
In one word - crap!
Nah, don't stuff around... tell us what you think!
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
**
The discussion list for
On 1 Dec 2004, at 11:39 AM, Kym Parry wrote:
Hi,
I am a new member to WSG and am hoping someone can help me with a
problem I'm having. I'm only new to web design and CSS, and am
learning as I go along.
I'm trying to create a site but it is displaying differently in
Firefox and IE and I'm
On 25 Nov 2004, at 5:48 PM, Mordechai Peller wrote:
As the only proper way to test to to actually run the software (screen
shots don't help much with JavaScript), and while any standards based
code which works properly in Firefox stands a good chance of also
working in Safari, IE, on the other
On 25 Nov 2004, at 12:24 AM, GALLAGHER Kevin S wrote:
Interesting, between IE6 and FF the image behind the menu is different
It's random. Reload the page and see...
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 25 Nov 2004, at 1:51 PM, Matt McCallum wrote:
I have a visual example of what I am trying to achieve here:
http://220.233.11.63/Misc/Drop-Shadow-Wireframe.png
I just wondered if any of you could steer me in the right direction
with this. Its probably a very simple solution that I am missing!
On 23 Nov 2004, at 12:12 PM, Jonathan T. Sage wrote:
If someone on IE5/Mac could shoot me a screenshot of this, I would be
forever grateful. trying to create a IE5/Mac safe layout. Only about
1.5% of my audience base seems to use IE5/Mac, but I know the current
stylesheet makes it a bit unhappy.
On 10 Nov 2004, at 3:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have given each page a body id and each list item in DIV sidebar an
id as
well but it breaks when I use the following: I will be creating
different
templates for the two areas Staff and Students so am not concerned
about
that list.
On 6 Nov 2004, at 11:15 PM, Marco van Hylckama Vlieg wrote:
Hello folks,
I have created a new personal site about 1.5 weeks ago. My pages are
valid XHTML and they display fine in MSIE 5.5-6 on PC, Safari, Opera,
Firefox but MSIE 5.2 on MacOS X cuts off the page at the bottom. I
have no idea why
On 7 Nov 2004, at 9:26 AM, The Man With His Guide Dog At The Tent Store
wrote:
script language=Javascript type=text/javascript
src=AccessKeyJavaScript.js/script
Yup, that's fine - for HTML4.
You might, however, like to look at standardising your tags in lower
case - you currently have a mix of
On 2 Nov 2004, at 11:38 PM, Sam Hutchinson wrote:
Hi all,
Fairly new here and been monitoring list for a day or so, all very
useful stuff.
Anyway, i'm having a bit of trouble with hanging images - my right
image hangs into the footer on Mozilla - any ideas?
On 2 Nov 2004, at 11:38 PM, Sam Hutchinson wrote:
Hi all,
Fairly new here and been monitoring list for a day or so, all very
useful stuff.
Anyway, i'm having a bit of trouble with hanging images - my right
image hangs into the footer on Mozilla - any ideas?
On 3 Nov 2004, at 9:34 AM, Kevin Futter wrote:
I've noticed this about Firefox too - it appears that the status bar
belongs
to the parent window, and child tabs open in the same window will
inherit
any status bar wrangling that is applied to that window. IMHO this is a
minor flaw in the way
On 29 Oct 2004, at 6:07 PM, Indranil Dasgupta wrote:
Another question, is there a float:middle or center?
No. Use {margin:auto} for left right; whatever you need for top
bottom. Be aware that auto vertical centering is one of the few things
that CSS won't do. Try a Google search on 'CSS
On 29 Oct 2004, at 11:03 AM, Indranil Dasgupta wrote:
But my XHTML validation says something weird about the ul tags. Can
you say what I need.
XHTML Validation is showing 5 errors only.
3 of them can be fixed by adding 'alt' attributes to these files:
img
On 26 Oct 2004, at 9:37 AM, Natalie Buxton wrote:
Woe is me. It's busted big time. And for the life of me I cannot work
out which CSS rules Safari and IE Mac are refusing to honour.
Two things:
In IE the navigation bar is sitting wrong.
In Safari it's the entire layout is busted big time.
Natalie,
On 26 Oct 2004, at 9:37 AM, Natalie Buxton wrote:
Despite what I say on my site, I do not hate mac users, I am merely
envious of them. Who doesn't want such a pretty and fast machine?
Mmm. Maybe '...asking you rich bastards...' rather than 'telling' might
get you a little more sympathetic
Joshua Street wrote:
What's the recommended practice with indentation?
Uh - is there any reason not to use pre? What you're talking about is
really visual presentation, isn't it? I'd respectfully suggest that the
indentation is not adding anything to the semantics of the content or
the code. A
John Wells wrote:
Which begs the question, when a stylesheet is loaded up by a browser,
will that browser automatically attempt to load every referenced
image, regardless of it being called by the HTML file?
This question's come up before - and the answer is... (of course) it
varies from
On 22 Oct 2004, at 12:17 AM, Craig Millman wrote:
This is my first post, I have been silently gobbling up info.
I have designed a website for a friend www.pacifichomeloans.com.au
which
seems to look ok in IE on Windows, however not in Mac IE.
The css is at
On 22 Oct 2004, at 9:59 AM, Lyn Patterson wrote:
#[name of page] #container #floatimgleft {background-color: #dff;}
but it didn't work. Only the last mentioned (#floatimgleft) worked and
(#container) reverted to general background color. Is there a way to
combine them - have I left out commas
On 22 Oct 2004, at 10:15 AM, Nick Lo wrote:
p
label class=blank for=input_phone_1
select name=input_phone_1_type id=input_phone_1_type
option value=Please Select/option
option value=work selected=selectedwork/option
option value=homehome/option
option
On 18 Oct 2004, at 12:33 AM, Jorge Laranjo wrote:
Looks good in Safari 1.2.3 (v 125.9) in the Mac OS X.
In Attach i send you a Shoot of that look...
Jorge - please, no attachments to this list. 100KB+ for a message is
too big. If you would like to help out with screenshots, send them
off-list to
On 18 Oct 2004, at 6:05 AM, Mordechai Peller wrote:
Let me start by saying that I have enough experience with syntax
checker
to know that the error message doesn't always point to the right place
and that one error can generate many messages. But that being said, I
think this one takes the cake.
On 16 Oct 2004, at 3:13 PM, Shane Helm wrote:
I'm not sure where I've gone wrong, but I must get a PC to check from
now on. Must go shopping. Oh no, will I actually own a PC.
Dreadful... Just teasing you PC folks. :)
I'm with you, Shane - I'd never use anything but a Mac as my main
On 15 Oct 2004, at 9:31 AM, Mark Stanton wrote:
Yeah everything is as low as it can go.
Considering each column has a minimum of 1 character+padding+margins I
cant see any possibility of all 80 columns fitting on 1 A4 page
I don't expect it to, but it would be nice if IE would allow stuff
that
On 13 Oct 2004, at 6:13 PM, Jackie Reid wrote:
Hi everyone
im a bit confused here - trying to validate my css and i get this
warning
Line : 0 font-family: You are encouraged to offer a generic family as
a last alternative
what do they mean... i always do that and get the no errors or
warnings
On 12 Oct 2004, at 11:57 PM, Golding, Antony wrote:
In Firefox, Opera, etc the layout appears perfectly as required. In
IE6 however, below the final image some of the dd definition is
repeated. At present, the final dd contains '21/09/2004 at 13:05:02'
and beneath that, '5:02' appears. The
Chris Kennon wrote:
The four programs across have started a chain of DIVS that seem more
cumbersome than table cells. How would one recommend recreating this
in semantically correct CSS, without the tangled mess of DIVS I've
birthed.
Chris, before anything else, you have a fundamental error in
Genau Junior wrote:
Can anyone explain me why this browser freezes, when the mouse sets
over the css menu tab?
PS:
My css file still no validated and some classes are repeated, but on
final version, that will be fixed.
Rule #1 for problem-solving: eliminate variables. In this case:
On 13 Oct 2004, at 11:43 AM, Chris Kennon wrote:
Can you point me to this section in the w3.org specification. I'm not
doubting your expertise, but I'm confused why a class and id cannot
have the same name.
On Tuesday, October 12, 2004, at 04:01 PM, Nick Gleitzman wrote:
Chris, before anything
On 12 Oct 2004, at 1:27 PM, Focas, Grant wrote:
I've solved the Mac scrollbar problem.
http://www.homebass.info/fixedPosTest/
Now the only issue left (besides that it uses CSS hacks) is that the
back to top link only takes you to the top of the content div minus
the height of the header.
Grant
On 12 Oct 2004, at 2:55 PM, Focas, Grant wrote:
Using a body id will not work because the top of the page is alsways in
view. It is the top of the content div which is hidden.
Well, in that case I've misunderstood what you're trying to do with the
link. In all my Mac browsers (IE5.2, Safari 1.2,
On Friday, Oct 8, 2004, at 23:37 Australia/Sydney, Richard Lake wrote:
I've added a top of page link as follows:
div class=topla href=#headerTop of page/a/div
and related CSS, as follows:
.topl {
float: right;
font-size: .75em;}
a.topl {
color: #660;
text-decoration: none;}
Paul, your CSS doesn't validate. This is failing:
div.sidebar {border-left: 1px solid #ccc; width: 200px; float: right;
padding-left: 5px; padding-vertical-align:text-top;}
Error: Property padding-vertical-align doesn't exist : text-top
Remember to validate!
The problem with IE5 lies with your
Lorenzo wrote:
URL: http://196.36.166.35/tower
CSS: http://196.36.166.35/tower/s/tower.css
CSS: http://196.36.166.35/tower/s/navDropdown.css
1. In IE6, the border/background of the top list in the #steps layer
appears
hidden. Is there a way to fix this?
2. There's also a major gap on the left of
On Tuesday, Oct 5, 2004, at 14:50 Australia/Sydney, Luke Moulton wrote:
So on one hand there's smaller file sizes, uncomplicated CSS (with
fewer
hacks) but imperfect semantics, and on the other there's perfect
semantics bloated CSS with a few hacks thrown in for good measure.
Where does one draw
On Tuesday, Oct 5, 2004, at 22:31 Australia/Sydney, Genau Junior wrote:
I Would like to know about your oppinion for using tabular data with DIV> LI> or to use table> to show them.
I´ve been researching on the web about this discussion but i didn´t found an answer really straight.
I am
On Wednesday, Oct 6, 2004, at 03:26 Australia/Sydney, Ted Drake wrote:
I visit all of the sites and read all of the blogs about css design.
I've seen the use of filters and hacks to make IE5 mac work. But I'm
looking for a place to see what IE5 mac does differently. Do you know
of a good
On Tuesday, Oct 5, 2004, at 05:33 Australia/Sydney, Manuel González
Noriega wrote:
Genau Junior wrote:
Hello,
My friend is asking me if i can use tags
ul
ol/ol
/ul
No. Make it
ul
li
ol
liLong live lists!/li
/ol
/ul
Close, but no cigar. Make that
ul
liI love nested lists!
ol
On Tuesday, Oct 5, 2004, at 10:19 Australia/Sydney, Parker Torrence
wrote:
Yes you can
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/lists.html
section 10.2
see DEPRECATED EXAMPLE:
~parker
OK, maybe so... but deprecated means it's not a good idea to use it
(just because it 'works' doesn't mean you should).
I have to say I'd use an extra class on the first li over that big
chunk o' Javascript any day. Apart from the extra code, what if I have
Javascript disabled?
My 2c...
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On Tuesday, Oct 5, 2004, at 13:55
On Monday, Oct 4, 2004, at 10:31 Australia/Sydney, Andreas Boehmer
wrote:
I am in the process of creating a FAQ section in one of my websites
and I
was wondering what would be the best tags to use for the
questions/answers?
Perhaps there is no standard, but I was wondering whether a
Uh - no... the point is that the markup doesn't change *regardless* of
what you do with it the css. Separation of content and presentation -
right? That's how come we can use ul's for horiz navbars, vertical
buttons, or whatever.
Neerav, in any case... What if you leave the Hx as block
On Saturday, Oct 2, 2004, at 19:32 Australia/Sydney, russ - maxdesign
wrote:
That does not take into account headings of different character
length. From
what I understand, the underline must be under the content only, no
matter
how long the content is.
Oh, OK - the bg image is being tiled,
I've never seen such 'nesting' listed anywhere in any CSS how-to info,
and I presume that (a) if it were possible, the technique would have
been published, and (b) it hasn't been published because it doesn't
work. Having said that, I haven't ever tested it, so I don't know for
sure...
What
On Tuesday, Sep 28, 2004, at 20:29 Australia/Sydney, Rick Faaberg wrote:
At here:
http://www.lucernemedia.com/
I'm trying to shrink the whitespace after the video titles
(.video_title is
the relevant style I'm pretty sure).
See anything obvious that's keeping the whitespace so big after the
On Friday, Sep 24, 2004, at 10:40 Australia/Sydney, Daniela Meleo wrote:
NOW, the client has decided that after handover he will need the
ability to
easily add new pages whenever he needs to (as additional topics not yet
know become required.) He's an open source techie type and will hand
code
Hi Lennart - welcome.
Your buttons are only visible for the width of the word used for your
links, plus its padding - so a bigger (wider) word reveals more of your
button. Try this:
#navlist li {
list-style: none;
margin: 4px;
float: left;
}
#navlist li a {
display: block;
...etc }
On Sunday, Aug 29, 2004, at 17:08 Australia/Sydney, Kim Kruse wrote:
I'm using the ALA tab menu (sliding doors) as my main nav. Now I've
been told that it breaks in Mac/IE5 into something like this... left
tab img - the link - right tab img. Is it possible to get it right in
Mac/IE5.2?
Hi Kim
On Sunday, Aug 29, 2004, at 09:09 Australia/Sydney, Seona Bellamy wrote:
Well, I've found a way around the problem (used an incrementing counter
instead of the ID-number from the database, so each item has a unique
ID) so
this question isn't exactly pressing any more.
I'd still love to know the
On Friday, Aug 27, 2004, at 18:20 Australia/Sydney, Seona Bellamy wrote:
I know this sounds like a lot of extraneous steps, but it is on
the Admin side of the site and it to allow them to easily administer a
list
of something like 50,000 line items without having to scroll forever
or keep
going
On Friday, Aug 27, 2004, at 15:37 Australia/Sydney, Zaac Woodhead wrote:
Is it possible to apply css to a select drop down/multiple select list.
Have a design on my desk with a fully formatted selectl list -
including the arrows, etc. Iknow it does not meet standards, but
is this possbile?
On Wednesday, Aug 25, 2004, at 18:49 Australia/Sydney, Mike Foskett
wrote:
Have you considered the documents appearance on a 160px wide PDA?
How about a Braille reader?
Surely you wouldn't deliver the layout CSS to either of these
devices... semantically structured text and (for the PDA)
On Tuesday, Aug 24, 2004, at 14:27 Australia/Sydney, John Horner wrote:
What would members recommend? Does this design, for instance, require
relative, not absolute positioning?
I haven't closely checked the the CSS, but in principal, yes -
absolutely (umm... yuh.).
I think your friend needs to
On Sunday, Aug 22, 2004, at 09:48 Australia/Sydney, Michael Kear wrote:
I was interested that the Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunity
Commission uses tables for layout in their web site at:
http://www.hreoc.gov.au/disability_rights/index.html
Pete, that's not a drawback - that's what list-style-position: inside is intended to do!
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On Wednesday, Aug 18, 2004, at 09:45 Australia/Sydney, Peter Ottery wrote:
the only drawback i can see from that is that
On Wednesday, Aug 18, 2004, at 10:18 Australia/Sydney,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, putting in the form field into my global nav div cause the
brown
bar (especially in IE) to become quite wide and not look right. I do
recall reading somewhere some time ago that the form tag causes some
On Tuesday, Aug 17, 2004, at 09:38 Australia/Sydney, Seona Bellamy
wrote:
I have a couple of issues with the site I'm working on. They have been
reported by the client, and I'm having trouble reliably replicating
any of
them so I can't work out how to fix them.
Can someone please take a look
On Friday, Aug 13, 2004, at 09:59 Australia/Sydney, Edd Hale wrote:
I am new to CSS and I am not sure if the image size (width and height)
should appear in the HTML or be handled by CSS. Thank you.
Edd
Aside from the validity/informational/decorative issues, the inclusion
of width and height
101 - 200 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
