David Laakso wrote:
IE6 doesn't appear to render the background correctly in a fieldset
with a legend (extends beyond top border).
Is there a fix or alternatively how would you hide the
background-color from IE6 only.
Georg Sortun, who is on vacation and unable to reply to the list
directly,
On Behalf Of Diego La Monica
I wrote an article about this, this solution does not require extra
markup.
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/popup_window_with_no_extra_markup.asp
Exactly, i wrote the mentioned script in this thread that identify by
itself
the external links and leave to the
On Behalf Of Diego La Monica
What i've said is:
to use windowed Links in it's base configuration you need only to insert
into the head block of your page the script element and any element in
your
html structure identified (id) as windowedLinks. That's all.
But applying this ID to some
On Behalf Of Diego La Monica
Yes is the only extramarkup, but you don't need really to add it:
in the head of the script there is a configuration block that allow
you to choose in which element (identified by its id) you would
put the control for the user to open in same/new window the
On Behalf Of Simon Cockayne
I've started down the rod of using DOM scripting...to remove the L2 items
when the page loads and then toggle there addition/removal when a L1 item
is clickedbut the JS is getting complicated...trying to support IE and
Firefox.
Is there a CSS way that can:
B) Then I use external (unobtrusive) Javascript window.onload to
remove (via DOM Scripting) all the L2 elements*...this works...but I
do see an initial flicker..i.e you can discern the original page
momentarily and then the L2 items being removed.
I'd not use the onload approach to hide the
I'd appreciate any comments that would help me improve this tool:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/z-index/teach_yourself_how_elements_stack.asp
Thanks,
--
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
***
List Guidelines:
On Behalf Of Mike at Green-Beast.com
I'd appreciate any comments that would help me improve
this tool:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/z-index/teach_yourself_how_elements_stack.asp
That's really cool Thierry :-)
Thanks Mike
BTW: congrats for your move with the Guild :)
--
Regards,
I'd appreciate any comments that would help me improve this tool:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/z-index/teach_yourself_how_elements_stack.asp
OK, this is obviously not an isolated occurrence anymore. I've tried to
look at your site 3 times now in the last couple of weeks Thierry and can
Of course, if there was a tag for 'foreign language word' then the best
choice (for the example above) would be to use that -- but there isn't.
Perhaps the most semantic solution in the above example would be to wrap
the word in a span with a class assigned, like so:
HTML:
p We say yes, but
p lang=enWe say yes, but the French say span lang='fr'Oui/
span/p
CSS:
.foreignWord {font-style: italic;}
[lang] { font-style: italic; }
[lang=en] { font-style: normal; }
What about:
span[lang] { font-style: italic; }
As a side note, I believe the attribute value should be between
Of course, if there was a tag for 'foreign language word' then the best
choice (for the example above) would be to use that -- but there isn't.
Perhaps the most semantic solution in the above example would be to wrap
the word in a span with a class assigned, like so:
HTML:
p We say yes, but
John Faulds wrote:
http://www.tyssendesign.com.au/sites/evolved/sax/
I can't figure out why the dropdowns fall behind the content below them.
Can anybody see what I'm obviously missing? :?
Hi John,
It's a stacking context issue [1], so increasing the z-index value of the
dropdown won't
On Behalf Of James Jeffery
I have a list of links with a nested list within one for the li's. The
nested listed is hidden
from view and made visable when the user clicks the parent li.
It works fine, apart from for accessibility reasons how should i implement
this list? Users
with JS
On Behalf Of John Faulds
*Sometimes* I find this works:
#parent {overflow: auto;}
You need to combine that with a width for it to work in IE.
I think it is a hasLayout issue, so it is possible to make it work without
having to declare a width (using zoom:1 for example).
You might also
For those using YUI:
Article:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/hacking_the_YUI_container_script.asp
Frameset to help you compare both solutions:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/YUI_overlay/comparison.html
HTH,
--
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
I've added a hidden skip navigation link to my site, that I want to
show up when you tab through each page. I'm using the method described
on the webaim site:
http://www.webaim.org/techniques/skipnav/#focus
Problem is, I realised that you can't actually tab through the links
on a page using
It's not an abbreviated form of the full date by any stretch of the
imagination.
Tell that to the microformats crowd - they've practically stretched the
idea of
abbreviation to anything, just so they can fit their machine readable
data into the page...
Exactly, and this is the kind
On Behalf Of Matheus Neves
Hi all,
I see everybody using lightbox as a good solution for photo galeries,
i´d like to know if anyone now anything about it´s SEO friendliness
and if it´s also following acessibility guidelines.
I did something not as nice as lightbox, but IMHO a bit more
I would like to appologize if I am off topic. I am not sure who to ask. I
am using !-- ... --!
to comment out a line in a PHP file. Firefox2.x will use it to comment
out a link and IE7 will not use.
Am I doing the commenting a line out right?
For an HTML comment, you should use !-- ...
Hi all,
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/clearing-floats_and_block-formatting_context.a
sp
The demo:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/block-formatting_context/newBFC.asp
Thanks
--
Regards,
Thierry |
only CSS in an external stylesheet gets cached...
ok john that settles it. no more inline styles in my forms. thanks.
If this is to style one single document, IMHO it'd make sense to keep these
rules within the head of the document rather than in an external styles
sheet.
--
Regards,
Thierry
My apologies for cross-posting.
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/float-less_css_layouts.asp
Demo:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/css-layout/no_div_no_float_no_clear_no_hack_no
_joke.asp
--
Regards,
Thierry |
My apologies for cross-posting.
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/float-less_css_layouts.asp
Demo:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/css-
layout/no_div_no_float_no_clear_no_hack_no
_joke.asp
I'll cross-post, too -
Does your approach deal with any column any order? Is this a
possibility?
Hi Karl,
As it says on this page [1]: The sequence of the columns depends on the
source order...
As far as I know, display:table doesn't let us play with columns the same
way we can do with floats.
[1]
OOps sorry, read your demo page and it doesn't. Sure, your visual
tabbing might not be the same,
which can be confusing ;-)
but for semantics and SEO, I think its
fairly important to have major content ahead of secondary content in
source-order.
I don't know. In my 5+ years old web site
Geoff Pack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thierry wrote (in the linked article, not his post):
DIVs are meaningless and cannot represent the structure of a
document
Really?
According to the HTML 3.2 spec, where they first appear:
DIV elements can be used to structure HTML documents
Thierry wrote (in the linked article, not his post):
DIVs are meaningless and cannot represent the structure of a document
Really?
According to the HTML 3.2 spec, where they first appear:
DIV elements can be used to structure HTML documents as a hierarchy of
divisions.
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/float-less_css_layouts.asp
Demo:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/css-layout/
no_div_no_float_no_clear_no_hack_no
_joke.asp
Nice write-up.
One of the issues with this technique: you
Al Sparber wrote:
The problem is with the standard. If one gets too hung up on semantic
markup
then there is the risk of bending the logical or implied semantics of
an
element to suit ones project. I submit that in the absence of a
perfectly
specific semantically correct element for a
When using DIV, what translate that hierarchy?
div id=level1
div id=level2
div id=level3I am down the hierarchy :(/div
/div
/div
The indentation in the markup?
Is whitespace required to make sense of DIVs?
The IDs?
If we need to use attributes to make sense of it, then it'd
Hi Bob,
I am interested in the excellent and well thought out work you have
done with lists here. Intriguing!
Thanks
However (and it's a serious question), in what way do you think that
using lists is 'better' than using a simple 2 or 3 -celled table (+ a
bit of CSS to style it,
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
DIVs are used for this, but do they *mean* this? If yes, then why
does the following validate?
div class=clearIt/div
For the same reason that
li class=foo/li
also validates.
You didn't quote an important part of my reply to Rimantas, who was saying:
I
Hi Steve,
Isn't the responsibility of screen reader manufacturers to treat DLs for
what they are?
Following this logic, we should be using basic table markup for layout to
give people using old visual browsers a better experience.
If we cheat with the markup to please user agents what's the
Unless order is important, I'd vote for a Definition List too
--
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim MacKay
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 7:49 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] semantic
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Isn't the responsibility of screen reader manufacturers to treat DLs
for
what they are?
Following this logic, we should be using basic table markup for
layout
to give people using old visual browsers a better experience.
If we cheat with the markup
Absolutely it is. I'm rather surprised at how badly they handle DLs, but
almost zero percent of web developers use them even now (remember that
standards-compliant designers represent perhaps 1% of the industry). Go
back just a few years and no one at all was using them.
Is it not also the
I'm wondering if the pursuit of semantics might sometimes be taken to
unreasonable extremes?
Must everything that is contained in the marked-up document contain some
semantic value? Must anything that does not have an inherent semantic value
be excluded? Surely not.
If an element is
The desire for semantic purity is only one of many factors when
deciding how
to mark up a page. Other factors include (but are not limited to) UA
support, the user experience, the time available to implement the
design and
the expected life of the website. I would expect a professional
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
No, what I'm saying is that we should write semantic markup and hope
that SR
manufacturers fix their product asap.
JAWS, to name one product, is a very expensive software.
Freedomscientific
should take care of its customers, it is not to the authors to lower
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
You're saying that a wrapper is needed to enclose all other elements
in a document to give it more meaning?
No I'm not. Point out to me where I'm saying that.
I said:
Why would we need to group containers together if it is not for styling
purpose?
You answered
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Because
like I said, following this logic why not using table markup to
give
users
of other UAs (old visual browsers like IE 5 Mac, NN6, etc) a better
experience too? Why just SR users?
because thats a different issue. It's an issue of the user
On Behalf Of Steve Green
I have a big problem with the term 'best practice', especially when it
is
used to effectively terminate a discussion. It implies that not only is
there currently no better solution, but that there never will be.
I believe that the most appropriate solution
Following the semantic list with explanations thread, I wrote a simple
script that transforms DLs into headings and divs.
The demo page:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/definition_list/from_definition_list_to_headin
gs_and_divs.asp
I welcome any comment that'd help me improve the solution.
On Behalf Of dwain
here's the link to the example:
http://studiokdd.com/sandbox/abstract-christian-art-new-testament.html
i have the jesus and disciples pic set to the long description and the text
link to the larger pic.
any feedback would be appreciated.
Don't you think this
On Behalf Of dwain
excellent suggestion!! i have other plans for the page with the larger image
as far as a description goes, but the link text suggestion is
superb. i wanted a way to let screen readers know that there was a
description of the image for non-sighted, blind, whatever is
On Behalf Of Thomas Thomassen
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 10:29 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Styling forms
While I see your point, what I find to be troublesome is that Label and
Input are inline elements. While it's easy to wrap the Inputs in Labels
and
make
On Behalf Of Thierry Koblentz
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 10:29 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Styling forms
TK fwiw, I think BRs are the perfect fit.
BRs? Are BRs semantically correct? I believe they aren't.
9.3.2 Controlling line breaks [1]
A line break
On Behalf Of Mike at Green-Beast.com
I don't think the break use has any bearing on the accessibility of the
form's elements so that doesn't seem to have bearing on my decision. No
negatives that I'm aware of.
Semantically speaking, I think the introduction of a break is akin to
adding
a
On Behalf Of Mike at Green-Beast.com
As a side note, I style these BRs with display:none.
I'm curious, what effect does that have on the styled page?Do you do
something like...
label {
display : block;
}
br {
display : none;
}
Hi Mike,
I don't use display:block, most of
On Behalf Of Andrew WC Brown
Here's an image to the problem
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/5567/iefirefoxlistcb1.jpg
Here's a link to the page
http://dutchakscrap.com/about.html
Hi Andrew,
Try this:
div.navigation a {zoom:1;}
As a side note, I don't see a need for that DIV, you could
On Behalf Of Dave Woods
That'll work for IE6 but haslayout also exists in IE7 therefore either
zoom or applying a width would be the best fix ;o)
Hi Dave,
The problem with width is that the rule already contains a padding
declaration, so it'd require to serve a different value to IE5.
On the
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 10:23 PM
I have a dropdown menu with a width of 150px. while localization some
texts are too long
and it is not wrapping inside the DIV and going outside the div. Is there
any way to wrap
long words. I dont want to use
This is pretty cool tool to generate volume of any kind of data (it even
includes SQL options)
http://www.generatedata.com
--
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
***
List Guidelines:
On Behalf Of dwain
target had something that just works and look what happened to them. wonder
how they feel about accessibility now?
although it's not the end all and be all of web design and development, if
you are wanting standards compliance then
shouldn't go just part of the way,
On Behalf Of Jason Gray
Michael
Your current code is
label for=commentsComments:/label
textarea name=comments rows=6 cols=40
/textarea
It should be
label for=commentsComments:/label
textarea name=comments rows=6 cols=40/textarea
The value
Hi, I really enjoyed reading this thread, especially the responses
from Georg and Breton, and thank you Dwain for asking the question.
I have heard a lot about unobtrusive js but thus far it's more like a
buzzword to me because I understand no JS.
I wrote an article that gives the basic
It looks good, but I'd agree with Tee, it needs some spacing.
Interesting use of DLs, but I would not use display:none to hide the DT
(shoot them off-screen).
Also, I'd get rid of the DIV wrappers you have around these DLs. I think you
could remove a few other DIVs from the markup.
If the large
On Behalf Of russ - maxdesign
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 1:37 PM
To: Web Standards Group
Subject: Re: [WSG] strong element being more semantical and accessible for
required field
I can't speak for screen readers since I've never used one my self...
But would there be any reason you
Hi Mike,
What about using a fieldset with *legend* if the
required fields can be grouped together. Because
the legend (required fields) would be read aloud
before each label.
In some cases that's an excellent solution (what I've been using for a
while) but unfortunately power users
On Behalf Of Kane Tapping
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 6:25 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] multiple css style sheets
How do browsers determine the winner in a conflict... well, AFAIK, they
take the first style that is most relevant to the element.
That would be
On Behalf Of Chris Knowles
Subject: [WSG] IE8 news
We've decided that IE8 will, by default, interpret web content in the
most standards compliant way it can. This decision is a change from what
we've posted previously.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ben Dodson
The switch to IE7 mode is a good bonus to have but there are a few weird
things such as the url in the address bar is always greyed out apart from
the domain name which is a bit weird (and I can't quite understand why
I think it's going to be a fun ride...
http://tjkdesign.com/test/ie8/links.asp
--
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kevin Arrowsmith
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 1:50 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Navigation menu problem
Hi All,
Im having a problem getting a menu to look right in IE6, it can be found
at
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ?
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 3:22 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Navigation menu problem
/*/ #nav a {position:relative;} /**/
Thierry, will this be seen only by IE8?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Fellows
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 4:33 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] WCAG 2 implementation site
I recall reading somewhere that 'accesskey' is often considered more
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steven Faulkner
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 10:12 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Jump Menu Title attributes
Hi Kevin,
What is the best title attribute wording to indicate a link is a jump
link (page
I need to wrap phone numbers, what's the best way to go for this?
[div class=phones]
[span class=tel][span class=typeHome[/span] +1.415.555.1212[/span]
[span class=tel][span class=typePager[/span] +1.415.555.1212[/span]
[span class=tel][span class=typeOffice[/span] +1.415.555.1212[/span]
[/div]
[/span]
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I need to wrap phone numbers, what's the best way to go for this?
[div class=phones]
[span class=tel][span class=typeHome[/span] +1.415.555.1212[/span]
[span class=tel][span class=typePager[/span] +1.415.555.1212
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Designer
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 6:07 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] netscape 4 and css
dwain wrote:
On 3/23/08, *Patrick H. Lauke* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL
You can only apply the alt attribute to img elements.
13.8 How to specify alternate text [1]
The alt attribute must be specified for the IMG and AREA elements. It is
optional for the INPUT and APPLET elements.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/objects.html#h-13.8
--
Regards,
Thierry |
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thomas Thomassen
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 5:44 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] INS and DEL in lists
I was working on some examples for the use of del and ins.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dwain
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 8:49 PM
To: web standards group
Subject: [WSG] floats and ie7
i thought i had fixed this problem. i guess i didn't.
http://www.alforddesigngroup.com/
in ff, opera, safari 3.1 and
thanks thierry for your response. there was no width set on the nav div and
that was the culprit.
after my bout with the nn4 style sheet i guess i was brain dead. let me know
when you will be in alabama
Hi Dwain,
It does not need a width, it needs hasLayout [1].
If it works with a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Horowitz
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 8:45 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] a target= blank not part of xhtml
I just read how a target=_blank is not part of xhtml
Why not.
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/how-to_fix_the_ABBR_element.asp
Thanks
--
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
***
List Guidelines:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jens-Uwe Korff
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 7:31 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Floating model: FF counterintuitive
Hi group,
I have a really easy setting:
h2
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 12:32 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] transitional vs. strict
It'll be a tough argument to make to a non-nerd. Your argument might be
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of russ - maxdesign
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 2:43 PM
To: Web Standards Group
Subject: Re: [WSG] transitional vs. strict
For example, I don't use the strict doctype because, its better, cooler
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Lecoat
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 8:26 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Definition lists for testimonials
Hi, I need to mark up a list of client testimonials. At first I was
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Persson
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 1:16 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Cc: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Full flash websites
The company I worl with has a big love for full
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steven Workman
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 6:19 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Reset the styles on a submit button with CSS
The style background:none is in reference to the background-image
property, which is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of IceKat
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 3:48 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Centered Horizontal List in IE7
Hey,
Sent this out, wondering if anyone has any pointers???
Using a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adam Martin
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:13 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] :: CSS Code Formatting ::
We use a very similar approach - php to deliver the css.
This allows us
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Kirton
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 7:00 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] The Problem of adjacent links
Darren
I'd be highly surprised if a screen reader manages to read CSS. Most
struggle with HTML
To
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Darren Lovelock
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 12:20 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Centering all items in a li
I've kind of fixed it using divs now.
#container { display: table-row; padding: 0; margin: 0;
So, there were a number of sites that began using fieldsets and legends
outside of forms.
You may still find documentation talking about how nice it is to work
with. Unfortunately,
fieldsets and legends are only for forms and you shouldn't use them
otherwise. I've actually
been dealing with
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 8:26 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Fwd: using fieldsets and legends (outside a form) for
adding structural markup
-Original
No, its not. In this case, if any single browser breaks a related
script, then the mark-up cannot be used - working on the majority is
not enough to make it viable.
Does that mean we should drop the ABBR element because IE
can't handle it properly?
In what way is that the same as
I think your misunderstanding lies earlier than my last post.
If someone wishes to use an abbr tag in the way that it was intended
by the spec, then that is perfectly acceptable, obviously. If their
scripting then fails in IE they have three clear choices - write a more
robust script,
I am surprised that we are even discussing this topic here.
This issue is mentioned in the last sentence of this blog post:
http://www.flexewebs.com/semantix/?p=5
Please follow the link provided in there to W3C site which mentions what
h1 is there for.
It's almost Friday, so here goes ;)
I
For a few years now I've been marking up a clients company logo as a
h1.
I just wanted to get an idea of how many people actually do this compared
to using a html image tag?
I believe a h1 is more semantically correct however I'd be interested
in seeing
what other people on this list think.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Skip Evans
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 4:41 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] innerHTML assignment overflows TD cell in FF
Hey all,
I have a table set up with a main content cell in
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Skip Evans
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 6:58 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] innerHTML assignment overflows TD cell in FF
Hey,
I see from reading up that innerHTML is not
And the node looks like this:
div id=newsnode!!main_content!!/div
Try this:
var maincontent=document.getElementById('newsnode');
maincontent.firstChild.data=Hello World!;
That is not changing the content of the div tag,
or anything on the screen.
It should. What happens when
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stuart Foulstone
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 1:37 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Marking up company logo
But the Webpage (or the entire site for that matter) is not be about The
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Dorward
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 8:30 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Marking up company logo
On 30 May 2008, at 15:50, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I'd say when it comes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:24 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Marking up company logo
But does two H1's in a row really agree with the spec? My understanding
Dev Toolbar type for IE:
http://www.debugbar.com/
And a very interesting concept:
http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage
--
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
***
List Guidelines:
301 - 400 of 543 matches
Mail list logo
