year and do pass the web
standards Acid 3 test. Safari 4 was unveiled this month. Both
browsers are still in the dev stage, so I reckon Mr. Andrew Lyle was
misinformed.
http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/presto-2-2-and-opera-10-a-first-look/
Todd Budnikas wrote:
according to Mr. Andrew Lyle
according to Mr. Andrew Lyle:
Safari 4 is the first web browser to pass the web standards Acid 3
test which demonstrates how well a browser adheres to CSS, javascript,
XML and SVG.
So, i'd say it's handling them pretty well :)
http://acid3.acidtests.org/
On Feb 25, 2009, at 10:39 PM,
A question came up today inquiring about a design my company has
recently completed. There is currently in the design an option to
reset the form on one of the pages. Does anyone have any opinions on
the usefulness of that feature, or statistics on whether or not people
use it?
Luke
The Firefox Web Developer Toolbar (by Chris Pederick:
http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer/) has an option under Tools
to validate Section 508. In the end, it ultimately just point to this
site:
http://www.cynthiasays.com/fulloptions.asp
There is an optional select menu to change from
Nathan, sounds like you should just apply position:absolute to to both the
image and your a and apply position:relative to the li (parent) for the
img and a to work off of. It would be helpful though to see the CSS in
addition to the markup.
I apologise if this has been dealt with before, but
:15 PM, Todd Budnikas
to...@missiondata.com wrote:
Nathan, sounds like you should just apply position:absolute to to
both the
image and your a and apply position:relative to the li (parent)
for the
img and a to work off of. It would be helpful though to see the
CSS in
addition to the markup
Damian probably gave you your answer, but I'll also say that if you
review the original documentation from http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html
for the code you're using, you'll see that they recommend
conditional comments to trigger hasLayout. In your case, in the head
a CSS hack, for ease of
display):
#NameofContainingDiv {
*zoom: 1;
/* all your other styles for the element */
}
#NameofContainingDiv:after {
clear: both;
content: '.';
display: block;
height: 0;
visibility: hidden;
}
David
Todd Budnikas wrote:
Damian probably gave you your
anybody know when Geoff is coming back??
On Dec 22, 2008, at 9:01 AM, Geoff Pack wrote:
I am on vacation until 5 January 2009.
If it's urgent, you can contact me on:
m. 0429 348 132
e. ge...@dhillon-pack.net Please consider the environment before
printing this e-mail.
The information
holidays
everyone. Enjoy!
---
Todd Budnikas
Creative Director
http://www.missiondata.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help
if you apply a min-width to your body in css it will also solve this,
including IE6 even though it doesn't understand it. Adding this to
your body solved it for me in your example:
min-width:900px;
On Dec 2, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Chris Cressman wrote:
Someone solved this for me. It was as
Brett, i'm not sure if the previous recommendation of PNG was for the
8-bit pngs with transparency, but that's what I'd argue. I often check
between GIF and 8-bit PNG when i export, to see which looks the best
at the smallest size, and PNG often wins.
On Nov 25, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Brett
wouldn't best practise for CSS sprites include image quality?
On Nov 25, 2008, at 11:23 AM, Brett Patterson wrote:
First of all, No I am not! Second I have tried out differences.
Notice the difference in file sizes. Thirdly, I did not say that png
did not support 8-bit, nowhere does it say
As someone who hasn't opened dreamweaver in years and codes css and
xhtml by hand, but learned to build websites in Dreamweaver, I would
say Rachel's approach might be difficult for some. This being your
first website Kate, I would say to use some of the better tools
Dreamweaver offers and
on Apache servers, you can add this to your httpd.conf:
AddDefaultCharset UTF-8
On Nov 19, 2008, at 11:23 AM, David Dorward wrote:
James Jeffery wrote:
Never had a problem with character encodings on web pages, but
since I
reinstalled the OS on my iMac I have had an issue.
Your server
Do you just mean a form reset input button? input type=reset
value=Reset!? You lost me on the but instead using the browser's
button.. what button?
On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Brett Patterson wrote:
How do I get a form field to reset itself back to its default value
if the user has
in other
browsers. NOT with an input button to reset. Thanks.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Todd Budnikas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you just mean a form reset input button? input type=reset
value=Reset!? You lost me on the but instead using the browser's
button.. what button?
How do I
,
and then decides to reset the page for whatever reason using the
browser's default refresh or reload button, the user-selected 2,
will change back to default# (or 0).
The reason is because for some reason, unknown to me, it is a major
part of my grade.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Todd Budnikas
:32 PM, Brett Patterson wrote:
Sorry, but no. If you look in FF3 it keeps the text entered in the
form field when page is refreshed the same. It does not remove it.
There are no code examples, and I have exhausted the library and
internet resources.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Todd
Wondering if people have insights into the length of a url for an
article, and whether or not it is recommended to complete the name of
an article in the url. For instance:
http://egovau.blogspot.com/2008/10/do-collaborative-online-groups-need-to.html
The name of this article is Do
i completely agree with Justin, and all points from just about
everyone who responded, so thanks. A follow-up question is then do you
paraphrase an article title into a url, or just chop it?
/music/a-fresh-and-powerful-new-cd-from-the-most-influential/
or
/music/influential-musician-new-cd/
with respect to both sides here, I have had numerous clients come to me
requesting Contribute as a solution. I would say the reason, in every case
i believe, is the cost. It's a 1 time fee of $99. I imagine, that if you
can offer something comparable or cheaper to them, they would appreciate
the
i would use the unicode entity for fractions:
http://tlt.its.psu.edu/suggestions/international/bylanguage/mathchart.html#fractions
so, 2/3 would be pcolour #8532; of natural.../p
Hi all,
Just a quick question. I'm writing up a website for a simple brochure
site, and the copy I'm provided
recently came across something similar, and was able to solve with a
combination of display:inline-block; on the p and overflow:hidden;
on the containing div. Might want to give that a shot.
On Oct 9, 2008, at 3:24 PM, Andrew Brown wrote:
Margin is already set to zero.
Removing the padding
tee wrote:
Wow, how glad I mentioned this. I had no idea there is short-cut for
email. If I, who spends 10 hours a day working on computer don't
know,
chances are, most folks don't know either. So there is really a good
reason to have 'back to top' implemented.
On Sep 29, 2008, at 5:23
it's irrelevant according to HTML 4 how you write the tags, so on one
front, your instructor is ok to say you should code that way (as it
does conform) but you have every right to say that he's *incorrect*
when saying you need to so that you can conform to HTML 4.01. Tough
spot to voice
On Sep 25, 2008, at 4:28 PM, kevin mcmonagle wrote:
im not an expert on this but should there be a fieldset or legend
around this?
not even sure if it qualifies as a form, although it has a submit
button.
h4Check-in Date:/h4
select name=...
option value=101/option
.
/select
Kristine Cummins wrote:
I have a div container that has a background image (gradation)
which is
displaying fine in IE7 Mozilla, but it's not displaying in IE5
IE6.
http://www.cpwrehab.com/test/index.html
On Sep 25, 2008, at 10:08 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Add...
* html #container,
I need to float elements in a container so that they have the same
margin between them.
I've seen somewhere a technique how this can be done without
additional
classes, but can only remember part of it.
This works in Firefox and Chrome, but not in both IEs:
div ...
ul
Cole, can you post a url so people can see the validator results and
review the code? Everything looks on the up-and-up from what you've
posted. I've never used the FF HTML Validator extension (is it the one
based on HTML Tidy?), so i can't speak for that. The Web Developer
extension just
mark and “0 errors / 0 warnings” at the
bottom-right-hand corner of FF.
As mentioned, no where near an emergency or a problem, but I am just
curious.
Cole
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Budnikas
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 7:08 PM
To: wsg
On Sep 3, 2008, at 6:19 AM, David Storey wrote:
On 3 Sep 2008, at 11:42, tee wrote:
On Sep 3, 2008, at 2:36 AM, David Storey wrote:
On 3 Sep 2008, at 11:28, Regnard Raquedan wrote:
Well, if it's akin to Safari, then it's as good as testing it
there, right? :)
Or is it...?
No, it
32 matches
Mail list logo
