Re: [WSG] advertising

2011-04-20 Thread Anthony Gr.
Interesting ) 2011/4/20 Carl Heaton c...@webcoursesbangkok.com HI Everyone, I was just chatting with some of my instructors and I think it would be of semantic value to have a cpc or advertising tag so that paid adverts can be taken out of the documents semantic value. Thoughts? C --

Re: [WSG] why :first-child pseudo-class doesn't work for some selectors/elements?

2011-03-10 Thread Anthony Gr.
I think, it's doesn't work but h2 is not a first child element in parent element (div). div pThis is the first child/p!-- first child element -- h2First header/h2!-- second child element-- pA paragraph/p h2Second header/h2 pA paragraph/p /div 2011/3/10 tee

Re: [WSG] html5 and iframes?

2011-03-09 Thread Anthony Schultz
Try frameBorder=0. Can you send out a screencap? anthony On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:46 AM, designer desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.ukwrote: I am having a problem with iframes in html5. I am trying to put a facebook 'like' link on a website and the results are not always as expected

Re: [SPAM] [WSG] html5 and iframes?

2011-03-09 Thread Anthony Schultz
. Anthony On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM, designer desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.ukwrote: Thanks to all who responded, but I should perhaps point out that 'frameborder' is not supported in html5. Also, let me stress : the code validates fine, and works fine - except IE7 and 8. IE6 is OK. I just

Re: [WSG] disallow IE6 to load the main style sheet

2010-12-18 Thread Anthony Gr.
Hi. I think, this example will help you: !--[if gte IE 6]!-- link rel=stylesheet href=style.css !--![endif]-- Best, Anton 2010/12/18 tee weblis...@gmail.com: I am finally to begin to stop supporting IE6 starts from 2011 as the usage has fallen below 5%. I don't want the IE6 users to see a

Re: [WSG] disallow IE6 to load the main style sheet

2010-12-18 Thread Anthony Gr.
Sorry :) !--[if gt IE 6]!-- ... of course. Best, Anton. 2010/12/18 Anthony Gr. ant.grak...@gmail.com: Hi. I think, this example will help you: !--[if gte IE 6]!-- link rel=stylesheet href=style.css !--![endif]-- Best, Anton 2010/12/18 tee weblis...@gmail.com: I am finally to begin

[WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: WSG Digest

2010-01-21 Thread Anthony Earl
Hello, Thank you for your email. I am out of the office from Thursday 21 Jamuary until Wednesday 27 January. I apologise for any inconvenience and will endeavour to get back to you as soon as possible. Kind regards, Anthony Earl. Accessibility Resource Officer Equality and Diversity Centre

Re: [WSG] Problem with onclick and onClick

2009-10-14 Thread Anthony Gr.
How does onclick become to onClick? 2009/10/14 designer desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.uk: Can anyone help me with what is a basic question please? I have a library item (in Dreamweaver) which includes an onclick: a href=# onclick=window.print();return false . . . etc When the library

Re: [WSG] Implication of empty divs

2009-02-08 Thread Anthony Ziebell
If you use a tool such as tidy html in xhtml mode it will delete your empty tags... probably a setting to turn that feature off, but something to think about... Cheers, Anthony. Gerard Hynes (Gmail) wrote: My advice below. Cheers, Gerard On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Ben Lau bensan

Re: [WSG] Users who deliberately disable JavaScript

2009-01-26 Thread Anthony Ziebell
_javascript_ should be implemented only to supplement / layer existing functionality. Your site should operate just fine without it... There are always exceptions to this rule however you shouldn't let _javascript_ dictate how you code. Thanks, Anthony. Sven Dowideit wrote: I have JS

Re: [WSG] Validating (X)HTML + ARIA

2009-01-20 Thread Anthony Ziebell
browsers no longer have a market share and leave our visually impaired visitors in the dark? Someone mentioned using _javascript_ to implement ARIA parameters. This is a good idea... but just how accessible would that be to a vision impaired visitor with _javascript_ turned off? Thanks, Anthony

Re: [WSG] Validating (X)HTML + ARIA

2009-01-20 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Oh, also... there is a requirement for our pages to validate (hence I can only see JavaScript as a valid option at this point?) Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: On 20/1/09 22:47, Anthony Ziebell wrote: It's more of a business decision... do we enhance our sites and make them a whole lot more

Re: [WSG] JavaScript and Accessibility

2009-01-19 Thread Anthony Ziebell
. Thanks, Anthony. james.duc...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm, I made a typo. Coffee time. On 1/20/09, james.duc...@gmail.com james.duc...@gmail.com wrote: after all it's impossible to tell those users using an accessibility aid like a screen reader from those who do not, and hey

Re: [WSG] JavaScript and Accessibility

2009-01-19 Thread Anthony Ziebell
My only concern with a draft is that things change... Chris Knowles wrote: Anthony Ziebell wrote: ARIA looks good, looking forward to it getting out of draft status. I wouldn't be waiting for ARIA to get out of draft before using it :) It has pretty good support

Re: [WSG] Validating (X)HTML + ARIA

2009-01-19 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Is it true XHTML 1.1 supports modularization and thus, ARIA, except for the role attribute / values? XHTML 1.1 (latest draft) allows XHTML 1.1 to be served as text/html as defined in RFC2854 or application/xhtml+xml as defined in RFC3236. This is exciting as it looks like we are so close to

Re: [WSG] Microformats Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Anthony Ziebell
ence: http://microformats.org/wiki/value-excerption-pattern-brainstorming#parsing_title_from_empty_value_elements Cheers, Anthony. Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Ben Rowe wrote: Obviously it is a clash of HTML standards VS accessibility. Actually, it's a clash of microformat

Re: [WSG] Microformats Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Yes, until the brainstorm is approved and made standard. Hopefully soon, to remove the requirement of extra CSS. You could apply a span.value style, or alternatively add 'hidden' as an extra class style and apply it to that. span.value style would probably be sufficient. Regards, Anthony

Re: [WSG] Microformats Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Yes, well thankfully there is a workaround. The ABBR element and title with machine code is a serious problem so far as accessibility is concerned. Regards, Anthony. Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Anthony Ziebell wrote: Yes, until the brainstorm is approved and made standard. Hopefully soon

[WSG] JavaScript and Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Anthony Ziebell
reader pick up the fact that the element is now there and read out this error? Has anyone been able to cater for this requirement? Thanks, Anthony. ***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe

Re: [WSG] JavaScript and Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Isn't 'aria-required' a non-standard attribute? Rimantas Liubertas wrote: Without using alerts, you could add the warning into the actual document. But how does a screen reader know the document has changed? For starters:

Re: [WSG] Title attribute

2009-01-13 Thread Anthony Ziebell
that meaningful text can be used for linking. You can read up on good link architecture here: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/10/importance-of-link-architecture.html Regards, Anthony. Chris Dimmock wrote: Hi Jens Actually, using the 'title' attribute in a link does NOT add

[WSG] .NET sites which are XHTML 1.0 strict

2008-12-15 Thread Anthony Milner
that right Microsoft and open source in the same sentence, I was also surprised) called Oxite. http://visitmix.com/ Oxite is still in beta and is built on the MVC platform which appears to be a good news story for building .NET web standards compliant websites. Anthony -Original Message

Re: [OT] Re: [WSG] Fw: The Great Firewall of Australia

2008-12-03 Thread Anthony
See you there. Bring your friends Regards, Anthony. Sent from my iPhone! On 03/12/2008, at 6:19 PM, Michael MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This just arrived in my email: Event: Sydney Townhall Protest to Stop Internet censorship filtering What: Protest Host: http://nocensorship.info ; http

Re: [WSG] Fw: The Great Firewall of Australia

2008-11-26 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Oh, it's certainly not spam. It's been all over news, whirlpool, everywhere. Brett Patterson wrote: 1) That, I do believe is a crock of shit! 2) If he does anything like that, he will be dead!!! --and-- 3) Anyone who believes in those ideas are fucked up, stupid, and this I

Re: [WSG] Fw: The Great Firewall of Australia

2008-11-26 Thread Anthony Ziebell
As I understand it, tests have already been completed in TAS? I'm not sure how accurate this is, though... as I have not seen any results. Andrew Barnett wrote: This is currently at the stage of the government looking for expressions of interest from ISP's to set this up for a trial. I

Re: [WSG] XHTML Standard question

2008-11-19 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Remember to use server side validation and you don't need to worry about rewriting standards :) Brett Patterson wrote: I know that most, if not possible to say all, Web page designers use _javascript_ for form validation. During a recent poll done by a few local colleges, 41.2% of the people

Re: [WSG] Question on servers and Email campaign

2008-11-11 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Sounds like a death-trap. Graphics Web Designing, LLC wrote: I am sorry to ask this question but I am very curious as to how others feel about this. I have a client that is purchasing E-mail listings from a company called expedia mail and I Was called and asked for my server's root

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-27 Thread Anthony
and there is nothing negative about prototype? Anyway I only respond again because I don't like to be miss- represented. If you still feel I am wrong and disprove of the wiki articles stating it is prototype-based, you really should edit them as it must be a miss-representation of javascript. Regards, Anthony

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-27 Thread Anthony
trying to debunk the notion of javascript being prototype. Not once did I say it does not have objects. Intact I offered that it does. Regards, Anthony. Sent from my iPhone! On 28/10/2008, at 7:40 AM, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/10/27 Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED]: My arguement

Re: [WSG] how come

2008-10-27 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Hi Kevin, The list-style-type (I assume that's what you meant) sets the list-item marker. So giving the anchor a list-style-type wouldn't effect the list-item. Cheers, Anthony. kevin mcmonagle wrote: hi, How come you cant change the list-type from none to circle(or anything else) on li

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-27 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Hey Breton, I think the examples you gave are implemented in the PHP object and are relatively simple to implement. Cheers, Anthony. Breton Slivka wrote: It is my understanding that the bulk of those OOP design patterns are useful to get around the limitations of static languages like C

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-27 Thread Anthony Ziebell
objects, I think I understand your point. Still confuses me though - if someone is object-orientated but is in essence prototype-based (with regards to object, inheritance, etc), why is it incorrect to say _javascript_ is prototype-based? Cheers, Anthony. Keryx Web wrote: Brett Patterson skrev: I

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-27 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Ok, great. It was my intent to acknowledge some standards / submissions for OO which inferred classes / native inheritance were needed. Thanks for your help :) Cheers, Anthony. Keryx Web wrote: Anthony Ziebell skrev: Still confuses me though - if someone is object-orientated

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Anthony Ziebell
as objects, and it is of my opinion that _javascript_ is more prototype than anything else. Thanks, Anthony. Luke Hoggett wrote: Indeed, as Alan Kay inventor of Smalltalk and OOP said "I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind." chee

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Anthony Ziebell
as native inheritance? Thanks, Anthony. Breton Slivka wrote: On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Anthony Ziebell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Luke, Discrediting c++ has nothing to do with the question "Is _javascript_ object-orientated?". With that, and in closing, I would lik

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Anthony Ziebell
n.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototype-based_programming#Criticism Thanks, Anthony. Breton Slivka wrote: On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Anthony Ziebell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Breton, There is a difference between the use of object and object-oriented programming. Yes you say t

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Anthony Ziebell
conflict with your argument anyway). Thanks, Anthony. Breton Slivka wrote: On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Anthony Ziebell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Lets all just agree then, that the first insulin is simply the best, so no further development in this area is needed. I am going

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-26 Thread Anthony
My sentiments exactly. Regards, Anthony. Sent from my iPhone! On 27/10/2008, at 3:46 PM, Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have in fact read your references, not only just now, but again and again I have read the wikipedia articles on the subject many moons ago. Frankly I fail to see

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-24 Thread Anthony
Word. Regards, Anthony. Sent from my iPhone! On 24/10/2008, at 11:32 PM, James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The language itself is NOT object-orientated, its proto-type based. It can be used in an OOP fashion, but this is not true Object Orientation as it is in languages such as C

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-23 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Hi Brett, _javascript_ is commonly referred to as 'object-orientated' but really, _javascript_ is 'prototype-based'. They do have different meanings, but have some similarities... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototype http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented_programming Cheers, Anthony

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-23 Thread Anthony Ziebell
arrays. This is why they are not real objects. Objects and arrays are totally different. Cheers, Anthony. Brett Patterson wrote: Hi Anthony, What about this link? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/_javascript_ Under Features -- Dynamic Programming? On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Anthony Ziebell

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-23 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Your point's are valid - my only real point here is that it is more of a prototype-based language, than object. Thanks, Anthony. liorean wrote: Brett Patterson wrote: I am in the middle of a conversation with this guy who says that _javascript_ is an object-oriented language. Is he

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-23 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Sure, that's what an "object" is. But OOP is not just about an "object". There is a lot more involved. Don't get me wrong, I am a fan of _javascript_ - but it has faux classes and objects, and this is why my opinion of _javascript_ is that it is prototype, not object. Che

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-23 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Forgot to clarify one thing: ECMAScript is fully OO in my opinion, however _javascript_ is not a full implementation of ECMAScript, unfortunately. Thanks, Anthony. Brett Patterson wrote: I didn't see that. :) But as I have read in other areas, _javascript_ is based on ECMAScript. And Object

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-23 Thread Anthony Ziebell
A 'superset' of ECMA3 which is not fully compliant. Right... liorean wrote: 2008/10/24 Anthony Ziebell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Forgot to clarify one thing: ECMAScript is fully OO in my opinion, however _javascript_ is not a full implementation of ECMAScript, unfortunately

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

2008-10-23 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Whether _javascript_ is OOP is kind of a matter of taste, rather than definition (Because there is no definition) Agreed, hence the diverse arguments for / against, and no way everyone would be able to agree on it. Perhaps we need to write a standard on OO. Thanks, Anthony. Breton Slivka

Re: [WSG] Nested List Problem

2008-10-23 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Hi Lynette, The first list has a nested list correctly inside of the list item, however your subsequent list items end the list item element before the new nested list begins... e.g: lia href=""WEED SPECIES/a/li ul id="subnavlist" li id="subactive"a href=""

Re: [WSG] Nested List Problem

2008-10-23 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Hi Lynette, I see what you are asking now - this would probably need to be refactored to have it validate. Cheers, Anthony. Lynette Smith wrote: Thanks Anthony - I've corrected that - but won't the repetition of ul id's stop it validating? The first list has a nested list

Re: [WSG] Nested List Problem

2008-10-23 Thread Anthony Ziebell
That might work - but then I don't know how the menu scripts work. If they rely on ID's, then you will need to refactor. Lynette Smith wrote: I see what you are asking now - this would probably need to be refactored to have it validate. Cheers, Anthony. Perhaps

[WSG] .NET sites which are XHTML 1.0 strict

2008-10-07 Thread Anthony Milner
, Anthony *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

Re: [WSG] Uppercase Tag Names

2008-09-26 Thread Anthony
It's no wonder students are coming out with such strange ideals. Tell him WSG says so. Regards, Anthony. Sent from my iPhone! On 26/09/2008, at 10:40 PM, Todd Budnikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's irrelevant according to HTML 4 how you write the tags, so on one front, your instructor

Re: [WSG] Facebook downgrading support for IE6

2008-09-02 Thread Anthony
to not have to worry about IE6 however I think that day will be a very long day coming. Regards, Anthony. Sent from my iPhone! On 03/09/2008, at 7:05 AM, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most schools around here don't even allow win2k on their network anymore. An interesting

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Coming very soon...

2008-09-02 Thread Anthony
Can't wait to get into the office!!! Regards, Anthony. Sent from my iPhone! On 03/09/2008, at 7:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Google chrome is available for windows download ! http://www.google.com/chrome On Tue 2/09/08 10:18 PM , tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 2, 2008, at 5

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Coming very soon...

2008-09-02 Thread Anthony
That was heavily talked about accross most topics already. Regards, Anthony. Sent from my iPhone! On 03/09/2008, at 7:41 AM, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 2, 2008, at 2:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Google chrome is available for windows download ! http://www.google.com/chrome

Re: [WSG] E649: The default scripting language must be specified for an intrinsic event:

2008-08-30 Thread Anthony
First of all try to avoid in-line scripting. You could make great use of jquery, mootools or any other library. Make sure to provide an alternative method (buttons, links, etc) to make things accessible for javascript disabled browsers, screen readers, etc. Regards, Anthony. Sent from

Re: [WSG] desktop application usability

2008-07-24 Thread Anthony Ziebell
Naveen, You are probably better off searching for a language specific standards group - I'm sure some people can help you here, but most of the questions posted to this list appear to be web related. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Where can Iearn more about desktop

Re: [WSG] Table Cells and display: block

2008-06-03 Thread Anthony Green
trying to do? Sounds a bit odd to display a table cell as a block tbh. On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Anthony Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've tried Google and the archives but no luck I have an issue with IE not applying display:block to table elements: tr, td, tr etc -- Anthony Green

[WSG] Table Cells and display: block

2008-06-02 Thread Anthony Green
I've tried Google and the archives but no luck I have an issue with IE not applying display:block to table elements: tr, td, tr etc Anyone see this before and know a work around ? Tony *** List Guidelines:

[WSG] Web Standards and Design Patterns in Web Applications

2008-05-12 Thread Anthony Green
Does anyone have any guides to developing standards based/accessible web applications like Basecamp ? For example a common pattern for website navigation is the tab list of links ul lia href ...Cats/li lia href ...Dogs/li lia href ...Mice/li /ul However web applications often copy the

[WSG] Your email requires verification verify#a6vQxgsxnTQ2Ky73eCXlkHoHksHXd3PV

2005-12-12 Thread anthony
Due to the volume of Spam around the internet, and in the interests of keeping the internet as spam-free as possible, unfortunately, the message you sent requires that you verify that you are a real live human being and not a spam source. To complete this verification, simply reply to this

[WSG] Jroller vs. Movable Type

2005-08-01 Thread Anthony Zeoli
...I've been doing some research and I'm not finding any real threads on a review of the software. If you have any info, I'd appreciate it. -- Sincerely, Anthony P. Zeoli Founder Netmix.com 333 86th Street, Apt 2C Brooklyn, NY 11209-5051 Tel: 917-705-4700 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http

Re: [WSG] correct use of BR tag

2005-07-27 Thread Anthony Cartmell
break, which is whitespace, so anything that strips it out should replace it as such. Multiple white space is collapsed (user agents should collapse input white space sequences when producing output inter-word space) so both before and after spaces are unnecessary. Anthony -- www.fonant.com

Re: [WSG] My life as an 800x600 leper (was: Site Check: Broadleaf)

2005-07-26 Thread Anthony Cartmell
as big as 800x600 seems like luxury! HTML was designed to work as a flexible presentation medium. I hate the rigidity of making it work like paper :) Cheers! Anthony -- www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites ** The discussion list for http

Re: [WSG] Learning The DOM

2005-07-18 Thread Anthony Cartmell
forms). I try to build without it, then add it once the XHTML/CSS has done all it can. Cheers! Anthony -- www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail

Re: [WSG] bitstream

2005-07-13 Thread Anthony Cartmell
play. It only works in IE as it needs an ActiveX control. Looks like these fonts used to be supported in Netscape 4.x but it's no longer supported in Netscape 6+. Anthony -- www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites ** The discussion list

Re: [WSG] font-familly: Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif

2005-07-06 Thread Anthony Cartmell
Bitstream Vera Sans is nice, and free. Anthony -- www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list

Re: [WSG] PNG support

2005-06-16 Thread Anthony Cartmell
http://www.youngpup.net/2001/sleight I don't remember what the problem was that I had with the behavior for doing this, but I found this JavaScript and it works fine. Sadly this doesn't work in Opera 8. Anthony -- www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites

Re: [WSG] PNG support

2005-06-16 Thread Anthony Cartmell
. Cheers! Anthony -- www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **

Re: [WSG] CSS problems in IE (weird font-size)

2005-06-02 Thread Anthony Cartmell
different things to IE6 too. Can't wait for the real IE7, and really hoping it'll conform to CSS as well as Opera and Firefox etc. Anthony -- www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

Re: [WSG] CDATA and html tidy

2005-06-01 Thread Anthony Cartmell
, which aren't allowed in XHTML apart from around tag attribute values. I think. Anthony -- www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm

Re: [WSG] (Apology) Most weird spam I ever received

2005-05-08 Thread Anthony Yeung
I suggest you see a sleep-walking specialist, :P Anyways, If you're curious if you're on a spam list, I suggest you do a search for your email on some search engines, and usenet groups. Anthony Yeung On 5/8/05, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's see! I am told I have spilt personality

Re: [WSG] Nested Links?

2005-04-24 Thread Anthony Timberlake
***The discussion list forhttp://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmfor some hints on posting to the list getting help****** -- Anthony TimberlakeCo-Owner of StaticHost Internet Services - http://ww

Re: [WSG] diagram that respects W3C standard usign CSS

2005-04-23 Thread Anthony Yeung
I believe that he is trying to create the majority of the diagram using CSS, i.e. all the boxes and connecting lines. Use of graphics would be limited to only small bmp arrows. On 4/23/05, Lee Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I might be missing something here but If you're allowed to use

Re: [WSG] IE7 update

2005-04-23 Thread Anthony Yeung
This is great news, let's hope that the CSS fixes are as good as they say they are. I'm definetely looking forward the beta release. Wouldn't be a strange world if we didn't curse developing for IE? We'd miss all the fun. :-) On 4/23/05, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [WSG] Please review http://www.mad4f1.com

2005-04-21 Thread Anthony Yeung
The site looks good, works well with Safari, Mozilla, FireFox, Netscape, IE, and Opera. Good content layout, and best of all no tables. - Anthony On 4/21/05, Pixel n Paints [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, I am freelancer from INDIA... I have designed a website http://www.mad4f1.com

Re: [WSG] Re: flash css hybrid example

2005-04-21 Thread Anthony Yeung
I must say this site has a very well designed layout and wonderful structure. I esp. like the Flash implementation. - Anthony On 4/21/05, Kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Heres a good example of a hybrid site that uses flash for presentation and css for content as someone had requested

Re: [WSG] Please review http://www.mad4f1.com

2005-04-21 Thread Anthony Timberlake
Very nice site presentation and I love the way that everything fits in with the theme. Nice use of standards. Very nice site. On 4/21/05, Anthony Yeung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The site looks good, works well with Safari, Mozilla, FireFox,Netscape, IE, and Opera. Good content layout, and best

Re: [WSG] Mystical belief in the power of Web Standards, Usability, and tableless CSS

2005-04-20 Thread Anthony Yeung
An interesting peiceOn 4/20/05, Paul Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep, he probably is right about that , but he's wrong about something else. My home page uses web standards and it's no monument to great design. http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webpagesthatsuck.com%2F...

Re: [WSG] making beautiful uri's

2005-04-20 Thread Anthony Yeung
If you're using an Apache Server, you can do this via a .htaccess file Here's how you code it: Files page1 ForceType application/x-httpd-php /Files Replace page1 with the file name of your choice. Save page1 with all your PHP coding as a file with *no* file name extensions, as Apache will

Re: [WSG] safari list question

2005-04-20 Thread Anthony Yeung
You have something wrong with your padding declaratives. Replace it with this: ul li {list-style-type:none; background: url(bg-bullets.png) no-repeat 0 5px; padding:12px;} Once you apply full padding around the entire image, everything should work properly. - Anthony On 4/20/05, Drake, Ted C

[WSG] Re: Automated accessibility testers

2005-04-13 Thread Anthony Timberlake
://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Anthony Timberlake Co-Owner of StaticHost Internet Services - http://www.statichost.co.uk Head Director at Spike Radio - http

Re: [WSG] Web standards as a selling point?

2005-04-12 Thread Anthony Timberlake
://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmfor some hints on posting to the list getting help**-- Anthony TimberlakeCo-Owner of StaticHost Internet Services - http://www.statichost.co.ukHead Director at Spike Radio - http://www.spikeradio.org

Re: [WSG] Styling Forms

2005-04-05 Thread Anthony Timberlake
rrectly.drew**The discussion list forhttp://webstandardsgroup.org/See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmfor some hints on posting to the list getting help**-- Anthony TimberlakeHead Director at Spike Radiohttp://www.spikeradio.org

Re: [WSG] IE7 isn't going to CSS2

2005-03-24 Thread Anthony Timberlake
getting help ** -- Anthony Timberlake Head Director at Spike Radio http://www.spikeradio.org ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org

Re: [WSG] [ADMIN] Site review requests and new Brisbane organiser

2005-02-23 Thread Anthony Timberlake
getting help ** -- Anthony Timberlake Co-Owner of StaticHost Internet Services http://www.statichost.co.uk http://www.spikeradio.org ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org

Re: [WSG] Site review

2005-02-23 Thread Anthony Timberlake
** -- Anthony Timberlake Co-Owner of StaticHost Internet Services http://www.statichost.co.uk http://www.spikeradio.org ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http

Re: [WSG] Site review

2005-02-23 Thread Anthony Timberlake
I got a MYSQL error yesterday, I am not sure if you want to check this. I also don't know if it has been reported yet... -- Anthony Timberlake Co-Owner of StaticHost Internet Services http://www.statichost.co.uk http://www.spikeradio.org

Re: [WSG] MSN redesign

2005-02-01 Thread Anthony Timberlake
** -- Anthony Timberlake Owner - StaticHost Internet Services http://www.statichost.co.uk http://www.spikeradio.org ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http

Re: [WSG] Re: MSN redesign

2005-02-01 Thread Anthony Timberlake
But at least it looks like they were. It is better than that crowded horrible page that they used to have. On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:55:56 +0100, Raffaella Biscuso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anthony Timberlake Scrive: I like it, but it leaves room to improve. They are a large company

Re: [WSG] content-language

2005-01-24 Thread Anthony Timberlake
** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Anthony Timberlake

Re: [WSG] Question about use of flash in a pure css page

2005-01-24 Thread Anthony Timberlake
://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Anthony Timberlake Owner - StaticHost Internet Services http://www.statichost.co.uk http://www.spikeradio.org

Re: [WSG] Nav Before or After Main Content

2005-01-24 Thread Anthony Timberlake
/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Anthony Timberlake Owner - StaticHost Internet Services http://www.statichost.co.uk http://www.spikeradio.org

Re: [WSG] User Preference Script

2005-01-19 Thread Anthony Timberlake
. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Anthony Timberlake Owner - StaticHost Internet Services http

Re: [WSG] Should we be thankful for IE's non-development?

2005-01-19 Thread Anthony Timberlake
://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Anthony Timberlake Owner - StaticHost Internet Services http://www.statichost.co.uk http://www.spikeradio.org

Re: [WSG] Your opinions about my weblog's new layout

2005-01-18 Thread Anthony Timberlake
/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Anthony Timberlake Owner

Re: [WSG] Another Zen Garden Entry

2005-01-14 Thread Anthony Timberlake
** -- Anthony Timberlake Owner - StaticHost Internet Services http://www.statichost.co.uk http://www.spikeradio.org ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http

Re: [WSG] Interesting Doctype: anyone seen something like that before?

2005-01-05 Thread Anthony Timberlake
for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Anthony Timberlake Owner - StaticHost Internet Services http://www.statichost.co.uk http://www.spikeradio.org ** The discussion list

[WSG] Web Design Theory Question: CSS only or Illustrator/Photoshop to CSS?

2004-12-27 Thread Anthony Zeoli
? Conceptual things of that nature. Can anyone help with links to a good design theory website or book. Thanks! -- Sincerely, Anthony P. Zeoli Founder Netmix.com 496 Court Street, Apt 3 Brooklyn, NY 11231 Tel: 718-858-7876 Mob: 917-705-4700 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.netmix.com AIM MSN

[WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Anthony Timberlake
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc. What can I do to improve my site? Is there anything wrong with it? Thanks for your help. -- Anthony Timberlake Owner - StaticHost Internet Services http://www.statichost.co.uk ** The discussion list

Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Anthony Timberlake
The color scheme is what I do not like. Can someone help me find a better color scheme? On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:46:27 -0500, Anthony Timberlake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc. What can I do to improve my site? Is there anything wrong with it? Thanks for your

  1   2   >