(or at least
fewer of them) if you use th elements for your row and column
headings (which would make it more accessible too).
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
increased
gives something very similar.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
are not changing the defaults,
they are probably comfortable with those defaults and therefore
we should not mess with it.
You can't please everybody all the time, but perhaps there's a
middle ground somewhere. If you're going to change font sizes,
do it in moderation.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn
too. And yes, I find that I often have to adjust my browser
settings (usually making text larger as my vision is not that
good) because other designers have gone even further than I have
in this regard.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading
:
#Example img { vertical-align:top } /* or bottom or middle */
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
support for
standards?
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
;
margin: -5em 0 0;
padding:0;
background-color:#ccc;
color:#000;
}
#contentbar div { margin:1em }
(x)HTML:
div id=contentbar
divContent here/div
/div
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
business owner's
point of view. I think that's what this whole thread is about...
The majority of their customers/visitors to their website
will not know the difference, so why should the business owner
care?
Sorry, I'm out of 1 and 2 cent coins.
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http
saw many that do. I am still on
top of this.
Kinda like www.sure-kleen.com ?
Don't ask me how I did it - I forgot. But if it does what you
want, feel free to reverse-engineer.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
of the page in question.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
at the Resources section of the Group's site.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
the latter option.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
;
}
#Container h1 {
background-color:#999;
font-size:1.5em;
margin:0;
padding:.6em;
}
#Container p {
margin:0;
padding:1em .8em;
border-top:1px solid #999;
}
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading
size of the h1, not its parent's text size.
Hope that makes sense - it does to me :-)
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http
).
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
is a record and
each column in that row a field (name, address, phone no. etc).
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http
? Might be some page outside W3C (since the
standards move quite slowly, i may use them for a few years :)
http://www.zvon.org/xxl/xhtmlReference/Output/index.html
Or the download version:
http://www.zvon.org/download2.php/xhtmlReference?title=XHTML+Reference
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web
that's about the only thing I
can figure out.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
that behaviour would be
if you insert a document (with quirks mode trigger) into an
iframe (or object) on the compliant page.
Note: just a theory - I haven't tested it.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
? It's valid CSS [1],
Mozilla ignores it and it ~may~ do what you want it to in MSIE.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#propdef-display
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
it a bit of slack - maybe some of your problems will be
solved by removing some of the widths.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http
post.
Just another point to consider (apart from the other valid points
raised about this practice), if my browser window is 750 pixels
wide and you're using a 200px frame on the left, you don't leave
much room for the other site to display in.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http
G'day
Al Kendall wrote:
Can anyone please tell me how to fix the following script to get the div the
stay in the center of the page in IE. It works fine in Firefox, but stay
left in IE.
Add this to your existing CSS:
body { text-align:center }
#content { text-align:left }
Regards
--
Bert
.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
these discussions before, so I'll leave it there :-)
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org
on abbr in MSIE (Windows),
since it does not understand abbr.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
G'day
Miles Tillinger wrote:
Could CSS be used to display that two-column table layout as a single
column?
td { display:block; }
Works in Firefox and Opera (Windows).
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
debate), we can save more
bandwidth by omitting html, head and body? Interesting.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
?
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
presentational id and class names.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
mentioned before.
If it doesn't do anything (other than invalidate the pages), I'd
just remove it.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http
G'day
Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
Hi Bert
So remove *wrap=soft* entirely?
Yep - I agree with Lachlan (for a change :-)
Soft is the default value, so it's completely unnecessary.
Remove it.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user
-12 HTML elements (html, title,
meta, body, table, tr, td, center, font, img and maybe a couple
more).
Yes, I know there are exceptions... Just thinking Google may
fall into this category as it's obviously script driven.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http
be the cause of the problem.
All I can think of is that it's related to the mix of left and
right floats, absolute and relative positioning in your #prinav,
with the ul having no width specified. Maybe IE is not expanding
the container to make room for the fourth list item.
Regards
--
Bert
() {
onoff.style.display = block
}
toggle.onmouseout = function() {
onoff.style.display = none
}
}
window.onload=init;
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
design in Google (pages from Australia
only). The top 3 (non sponsored) sites used tables for layout,
none of them validated and only one had a doctype. They all used
some CSS but only in addition to the tagsoup.
So where are the benefits?
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http
Before we get a flood of posts along the lines of my favourite
editor is and mine too ...
Have you looked at the resources section of the WSG website?
http://webstandardsgroup.org/resources/
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user
the benefits of X(HT)ML later, when browsers support it.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
=externalBlahspan /span/a
FWIW, I don't like the idea of adding extra, non semantic markup
for presentational purposes.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion
.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
the document valid.
Using divs to insert the numbers is IMO worse than using a (for
transitional DTDs) valid, though deprecated attribute.
In theory, you could use counters in CSS, but as far as I know
very few browsers actually support it at this point in time.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
attributes on a number of images. If they don't need alt
text (i.e. they are just for visual effect), consider putting
them in the css as background images.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
use { display: inline-block } instead. At least that's
defined in the CSS2.1 working draft.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http
be 100% of its parent's inner width.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
Tim Burgan wrote:
Just a quick note that'll help:
In the URL, the special characters (such as ampersands, question marks,
etc) need to be converted to html character entities.
Question marks do not need to be converted.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http
tick marks from various automated tools), given I use
properly coded labels and (where needed) fieldsets for the inputs?
It seems crazy to repeat the label text (or slightly amended info) in
the input for people to overwrite (and some will perhaps leave it in there!)
Regards
--
Bert Doorn
had a grey background. It wasn't until I clicked in one of them
that I realised the field was not disabled.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list
do
gymnastics to move my mouse to the beginning of the box), it's a
good point.
Not everybody is like me (which is just as well :-)
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
you get a similar effect in other
browsers) would be an option?
Yes, I used a table for layout back in 2002.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list
you see the line - your hidden input will be
given display:block, with that border.
Removing display:block should fix it.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
that the validator is spot on with its
possible cause. Let me re-write it to suit:
-
The cause for this message is that you have attempted to put a
block-level element (h2) inside an inline element (span).
--
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http
problems stem (at least in part) from this invalid coding.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
Not sure what exactly you're asking, but:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A//www.zachinglis.com/ZachInglis.html
It's broken code, which may explain why you are having problems.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
be different for someone who went
there looking for something this site has to offer (whatever that might
be - I can't see it at a glance).
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
/filters to stop Mac IE from using the rule above.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
(be it css.asp, css.php or whatever) it should work in more browsers than just MSIE.
I just ran a test and it worked fine in Opera 8, Firefox, MSIE6 and MSIE5 PC. If it's served as text/css and the output is valid css, it shouldn't matter what the extension is.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
or was it too
lenient before? Should we ignore the warnings?
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
to the
right but it is always positioned under the banner.
A couple of things you might try:
1. Float the sidebar left instead of right
2. Don't float the sidebar at all.
3. Give the sidebar a little less than 25% width (e.g. 24%), Some
browsers cannot add up
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better
@webstandardsgroup.org/msg17576.html
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
for images in a certain section)
Firefox (and perhaps other browsers too) have a default image alignment
of baseline which leaves that gap at the bottom.
Incidentally, you might want to have a look at the site with images
disabled. Or load it over a dial-up connection.
Regards
--
Bert
-- either on its own or as part of a sequence of links. Link text
should also be terse. For example, in HTML, write Information about
version 4.3 instead of click here.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
it and
had to resort to Ctrl+F5 to see the update (in various browsers). That
might just be a server setting, but I don't know. Changing the css
filename is not a good idea as you would then need to edit every html
file to point to the updated file?
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web
I wrote:
Changing the css filename is not a good idea as you would then need to
edit every html file to point to the updated file?
Unless like you (John) mentioned, one uses an include (I missed that bit).
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast
.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
table or is part of a navigation
list? If the latter, I'd use a list (ul or ol) rather than a table.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list
as text/html. Don't know about IE5.x
If you're serving application/xhtml+xml it's not going to work in IE
because IE doesn't like application/xhtml+xml.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
in
the browsers that most people use. Horses for courses.
History teaches us that such things, regardless of their present
usefulness, we usually come to regret.
I am sure history has plenty of examples of quite the opposite too :-)
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http
://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WCAG20-HTML-TECHS-20050630/#layouttables-avoid
It is *recommended* that authors not use the |table| element for layout
purposes *unless the desired effect absolutely cannot be achieved using
CSS*.
I rest my case.
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http
,
depending on how you interpret them :-)
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
awfully
complex css based designs.
Anyway, I've said enough. I'm happy to dwell in the middle ground,
doing what I can with what I know.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
=header and just style the h1 element. Unless you use
more than one h1 per page...
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http
documents?Nah!
Anyway, ICSS is not a religion to me and I will use a simple layout
table if it helps me achieve what I need to achieve :-) And yes, it
will validate!
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
G'day
What's out there that displays the contents of a URI and validates?
object type=text/html data=whatever.html id=Something
Alternative content here
/object
Give the object a width and height with CSS
#Something { width: 40em; height: 30em; }
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web
to use
one occasionally especially if the non table approach adds unnecessary
weight to the design.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list
the means available
to me to deliver what I am paid to deliver in the most efficient way I
can. To me that means CSS based layouts *most* of the time.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
on a tab
2. The links (in the tabs) are to different urls.
3. There's no (i)frame, object or JavaScript anywhere in the source
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
(unordered) list? Since (as I read it) all the
images are the same size (width AND height?) you can float the image
left. Something like:
ul#nav li { height: 100px; } /* add whatever else you need */
ul#nav img { float:left; width:100px; height:100px; }
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web
option or plug-in?
I do get the jumping horizontal scrollbar, which is a direct effect of the
content expanding with the long text on submenu items.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
. But
maybe I'm mistaken..
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
to
fix it, the auto left margin on the ul and problems with the IE5 box
model may be part of the reason for it (no guarantees).
Note for YW Webmaster: a 34kB email to say Can you describe what its
doing wrong in IE 5 and 5.5? seems a little over the top.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web
I thought this thread was CLOSED?
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org
, I believe we *should* avoid these
(and other) presentational elements and attributes in our (x)html,
whether deprecated or not.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
to
#Home:hoverSame goes for the other links.
Hope this makes sense.
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
not add padding-bottom:1em (or
whatever you need) to the div?
If it's there for another reason, you could try giving it a height (through CSS)
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
from potential customers, or is it
important information they came to the site for? Spare a thought for
visitors who use MSIE (which likely will be most of them) and don't have
perfect eyesight (which may be many of them).
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http
. document.getElementById(randomimage).src=imageArray[picknum];
(and just put the file names and paths into the array)
Note: I haven't tested it, but it should work in theory (except in very
old, pre DOM browsers)
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Web Developer
Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au
Regards
trickery (absolute positioning, z-index etc)
to make it appear behind other objects.
Hope this answers your question
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list
- a number of links with
the same text [read more] going to different URL's. (Checkpoint 13.1)
And there's a couple of errors and warnings in the CSS.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Web Developer
Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au
).
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
G'day
I'd say your problem is here:
#navwrapper li a:link, a:visited {
See the a:visited? That affects ALL links on the page.
I think you meant to say:
#navwrapper li a:link, #navwrapper li a:visited {
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast
{ display:block }
p class=lfigureimg /Caption/p
And maybe it should be a div rather than a p(aragraph). To float
the paragraph (or div), add a width to .lfigure and give it a
float:left or float:right as appropriate.
HTH
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading
that it looks about right to me.
You might also want to add margin-right to .lfigure so text that
wraps around the float has a little breathing space.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
think we're far enough off-topic already.
But how about cutting down the size of your emails and making
them plain text? No need to repeatedly quote 40k of text with
all that Micro$oft formatting in it.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading
tries to balance the table cell heights and in so
doing makes the header cell taller than you want it. You may
be able to fix this by setting a height (in CSS) on the header.
Better still, as David hinted, don't use a table for layout.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo