On 2/17/06, kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://63.134.237.108/
This enables a blind user to see the document and navigate it
easily.
Can your consultant find a cure for world hunger, as well as enabling
the blind to see? ;-)
**
The
They work fine on IIS in windows, as long as yourusing .shtml or .asp as yourfile extension.
As long as the code in the file you are calling is standards compliant,it doesn't make any difference how you call it. The browser will justtreat the code as if it were part of the calling page, just like
Heres another link that might help, http://www.alistapart.com/articles/sprites/
Charlie
http://www.bartlettdesign.co.uk
On 1/15/06, Rob Mientjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/01/06, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The simplebits is very interesting. But it seems angled images in a list
that
This might help you, Screen Res is near the bottom somewhere.
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.aspThe latest figures are for July, so its a little out of date.
I agree with Bobs point though, it interesting that we used to design for 800x600 so all our visitors could read our
this link might help
http://www.remote.org/jochen/mail/info/chars.html
Charlie
http://www.bartlettdesign.co.uk
On 11/23/05, Jona Decker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am assuming there are other web developers in Exchange environmentsthat might have some insight into a problem I'm having. It's
If you have to do it this way, and like everyone else I don't recommend
it, then you could help the SEO by adding the pages in link tags to the
head.
see http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_link.asp for more info.
Cheers
Charlie
web : http://www.bartlettdesign.co.uk
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
also are you certain you have closed all your a tag's?
Charlie
http://www.bartlettdesign.co.uk
On 11/19/05, James Gollan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
its not to do with a bold font taking up more space and shifting otherelements?Stuart Sherwood wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with a bug in
Because it is a hack, I tend to use the same technique as Joesph, I think its best to avoid hacks wherever possible.
Charlie
http://www.bartlettdesign.co.uk
On 11/15/05, The Visual Process [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm confused at your suggestion, why add extra markup when you just needto use the
moaning at me because their sites have suddenly stopped working. This technique is far more future proof, and allthough its not semantically perfect, i prefer it to having unnecessary voice selectors in your style sheet.
On 11/15/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charlie Bartlett wrote
