I wish I had my blogging/community system finished for you, Mark. It
will be ASP.NET 2.0 and CSS/XHTML compliant. It won't be ready until
early next year.
--
Francesco Sanfilippo
Web Architect and Software Developer
http://www.blackcoil.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
402-932-5695 home office
402-676
://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Francesco Sanfilippo
Web Architect and Software Developer
http://www.blackcoil.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
402
, Safari, and Opera).
--
Francesco Sanfilippo
Web Architect and Software Developer
http://www.blackcoil.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
402-932-5695 home office
402-676-3011 mobile
Professional web developer and Internet consultant with 10 years experience.
Specializing in ASP.NET, C#, SQL Server, CSS/XHTML
I'd have to agree with that. Our studies also show maximized browsing
for over 90% when users are working at 1280x1024 or below.
--
Francesco Sanfilippo
Web Architect and Software Developer
http://www.blackcoil.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professional web developer and Internet consultant with 10
I would guess that unless one is aware that mobile phones are a
significant population (over a few percent), one could simply detect
mobiles and serve them an unstyled page, rendering plain text? This
would fit into any browser width if done correctly.
Francesco
On 8/3/05, Chris Velevitch
Easy. I don't rely on Javascript for anything critical. I would
rather use a layout hack without Javascript.
Francesco
On 7/16/05, Maarten Stolte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not just use the technique from Bobby van der Sluis, it works all the
time on dom enabled browsers;
I have a different opinion. Neither Reset nor Cancel are
necessary. Studies show most users click the back button to abort
transactions (even I do, and I'm a web developer) or leave sites (if
there are no appealing links to go anywhere else).
I can see where Cancel could be a little more