On 17/02/06, Jamie Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I've never been sure what the context of a table cell is which is
following more than one th in the same scope.
The section on table rendering by non-visual user agents in the HTML
specification [1] will shed some light. When a table cell
On 31/10/05, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
name is used for old browsers. And I'm pretty sure it validates against a
Strict DTD (HTML or XHTML 1.0).
Please correct me if I'm wrong here...
No, you're indeed correct. Up to XHTML 1.0 Strict it's perfectly
On 11/09/05, Chris Kennon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've discovered that leaving the value blank tabindex=does not
invalidate the page, or upset tidy.
It does invalidate the page, it's just that the validators aren't
catching it. The attribute value must be a number in the range 0 to
32767
Hi Ted,
On 12/09/05, Drake, Ted C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you have multiple tabindex=0 in a document?
Yes, you can have multiples of any numbers (in the range 0 to 32767).
Positive numbers with multiple values are visited in the order they
appear in the character stream.
Best regards,
On 16/08/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see one. In that particular case, such behaviour makes sure that the user
still can reach the href value. IMO, it makes sense,
and AFAIK, that's how Opera's blocker works. It ignores *both* statements,
window.open *and* return false.
On 16/08/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm talking about a simple:
onclick=window.open(this.href,'myPopup'); return false;
In this particular case, if you consider normal to arbitrary ignore the
window.open statement, then why do you consider outrageous to ignore
return false.
Hi Ted,
On 16/08/05, Drake, Ted C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a quick question. I don't seem to be running on all cylinders and I
can't remember how to write the css that would look for a link that has .pdf
in the href.
A [href???.pdf]...
Only CSS3 has attribute selectors that would be
Hi Jan,
Maybe strange questions - Do the users of screen readers have flash? (I
have no idea for a reason why they shloud)
Some screen readers sit on top of browsers like IE. If IE has Flash
embedded in it, and the Flash has been made accessible (see
http://www.webaim.org/techniques/flash/),
Hi Jan,
On 15/08/05, Jan Brasna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some screen readers sit on top of browsers like IE. If IE has Flash
embedded in it, and the Flash has been made accessible (see
http://www.webaim.org/techniques/flash/), then it's exposed to the
screen reader. The reason that screen
Hi Thierry,
This short script doesn't name the window, so it should spawn multiple
popups.
I'd use: onclick=window.open(this.href,'myPopup'); return false;
As a side note, some blockers kill these popups.
The window.open function returns true if successful, otherwise false.
You could use the
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:17:28 +0200, Piero Fissore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know why Bobby doesn't consider this structure valid
(WCAG 1.0 ยง10.5)?
dl
dtBlog/dt
dda href=#01/a/dd
dda href=#02/a/dd
dda href=#03/a/dd
/dl
It's a bug. I vaguely remember
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:55:26 -0600, Steve Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
script type=text/javascript
document.getElementById('EmailAddress').setAttribute(required,true);
document.getElementById('EmailAddress').setAttribute(validation,email);
/script
This would be the slightly more
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:17:50 +1200, Sigurd Magnusson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gez; So you're under the opinion, if you're setting attributes, only for
later retrieval (i.e. that the user agent is specifically being asked to
ignore the attributes), that this is poor design?
I don't necessarily
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 20:51:33 +1300, Sigurd Magnusson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could put the label around the image button, or have a blank one, but this
sort of defeats the purpose in my opinion... ideas?
Both Patrick and Roger are correct. It's the text field that requires
a label in order
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:04:23 +1200, Sigurd Magnusson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over the past few years, we have built up a library of rather useful
Javascript libraries that we thought were a very elegant solution for adding
behaviour to menu systems and forms. These have been used on dozens of
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 03:46:21 +, Gez Lemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
input type=text name=EmailAddress required=true class=email/
Didn't mean to leave the required attribute in, sorry :-)
input type=text name=EmailAddress class=required email/
Cheers,
Gez
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:51:46 -, Jamie Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
Does anyone know what the output for a Screen Reader would be for example;
thacronym title=Cascading Style SheetsCSS/acronym/th
JAWS can be configured to read the title attribute of abbreviations
and
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:23:40 -0500, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting undefined instead of DOCUMENT_NODE or 9? I used
if(aNode.tagName){ ...} to achive the required result, but it's a hack
and I want to know what's wrong with nodeType?
I suspect it's because you've returned a
The code tag is the correct element to use to markup code snippets.
You could add a rule to your CSS to make it preserve white space:
code
{
white-space: pre;
}
The obvious problem is that it won't preserve the white space when CSS
isn't available. An alternative is to place the code tags
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:13:28 -, Stevio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have put together a page using some information from various sites and
adding / changing bits to come up with the following page:
http://www.fit2gether.co.uk/aboutsite.html
You will see that there is a small
Here in Firefox on Windows I see space below the top row
of images:
http://elmbrook.org/navigation2.html
The border is in there only to show what's going on. In
IE it looks fine. I assume it's user error. Any hints? Thanks.
Jeff
It's because Firefox is rendering the document in standards
I wrote:
I mention a similar effect when transitional
HTML documents are served as application/xhtml+xml, whcih forces
Apologies, that should read XHTML documents, as only the most unstable
person would deliver an HTML document as application/xhtml+xml
Best regards,
Gez
Steven wrote:
Also, excuse my slight ignorance here, but just because a page validates as
XHTML and CSS compatible, does that make it accessible?
True. It doesn't even necessarily mean that it's semantically correct,
as there tends to be a trend in pages that just consist of a load of
divs
What's more in-spec:
div id=hello/div
Or
div id='hello'/div
Both versions are acceptable, although the de-facto standard is to use
double-quotes.
Best regards,
Gez
_
Supplement your vitamins
http://juicystudio.com
24 matches
Mail list logo
