Please, please, please everyone.
Discuss web standards on the web standards group mailing list, and "my
text/WYSIWY editor is better than yours" on the HTML Editors mailing
list...
If there isn't one, feel free to set it up.
thanks,
Grumpy John.
Hi Kepler,
In many ways, has been deprecated in favour of and in
favour of (emphasis). (underline) has been deprecated because
it shouldn't be part of structural markup, but instead part of styling,
so it would be replaced by or similar.
The reason (bold) and italic haven't actually
oup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******
best wishes,
John Hancock
Identity
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t: +61 2 8012 2967
f: +61 2 9799 6135
***
uidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
best wishes,
John Hancock
Identity
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t: +61 2 8012 2967
f:
Hi Michael,
That seems incredibly arbitrary when a robots.txt is purely optional -
especially as the default spider behavior is to index all unless told
otherwise. So you're penalizing people by having your robot behave in the
opposite manner? And regarding PICS labels, most people don't know how
the stats. For myself,
I'd be unwilling to support people who steal rather than go to linux-based
operating systems. Unfortunately, it's impossible to tell the difference!
John Hancock
Identity
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lea
'd say these are more language-based or protocol
based and that's a pretty small niche in web standards.
I feel that more on the subject would take my response away from Web
Standards, so feel free to contact me off-list if you want to discuss
further.
best wishes,
John Ha
How can you disagree with a capability? Isn't it a feature to be used
if you so choose? For intranets etc that you can force this behaviour
can actually be a good thing, but if you don't like it, you don't have
to use it! Microsoft has certainly responded here, but in my opinion
we shouldn'
- alachua co library
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:42:07 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2008/02/27 18:39 (GMT+1100) John Hancock apparently typed:
>
>> Just a thought, but a moderately high resolution environment to me is a
setup of over
>> 3mpx. For instance, dual 20" TFTs, dual
us with extremely large working areas should
usually have a 17" TFT or lower to test on for 'the great unpixeled'.
kind regards,
John Hancock
Identity
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t: +61 2 8012 0274
f: +61 2 9799 6135
***
List
an off-topic message, please at least mark it as such so the rest
of us can hit the delete button without checking it first for relevant
information!
Kind regards,
John Hancock
Identity
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joe Ortenzi
Sent: Friday, 15 February
s (one shows a menu,
one takes you to another page). Consistency is key - but remember that
users usually browse in only one browser at a time.
John Hancock
identity.net.au
PS. On a side-note, can we keep platform discussion to standards and
implementation? 'My computer is bigger/bett
Personally, I think the img tag has the correct semantics (and attributes) for
an image. I'd just keep them for images in paragraphs and use css background
for everything else.
An object is just that!
-Original Message-
From: Michael Horowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 1
Hi Taco,
Have you got a link to the page you're trying to fix this on?
Regards,
John Hancock
Identity
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Taco Fleur
Sent: Friday, 7 December 2007 12:51 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG]
would fix it now, you can always mention it as a SEO problem if you
need to provide a business case for it.
kind regards,
John Hancock
Identity
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t: +61 2 8012 0274
f: +61 2 9799 6135
***
List Guidelines: http://w
I fear for their welfare.
Best,
~dL
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Me too. Personally I like seeing tags have only text content in
them, and to at least have text content in them. Hey, are we in a
timewarp? I have an issue that a lot of the content is inaccurate (eg.
Ajax isn't a
or smaller screen resolutions.
kind regards,
John Hancock
Identity
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t: +61 2 8012 0274
f: +61 2 9799 6135
On 15/11/2007, at 5:02 PM, Christie Mason wrote:
We're having an internal discussion about the placement of site
navigation
(Contact Us, etc) vs Product Navigation (Sea
Hi James,
This might sound like a stupid idea - it's late and I haven't thought
it through fully, but can't you hide it the relevant nodes by
triggering something through onLoad on the body tag - that way if JS
is disabled the page will load with the lists expanded rather than
invisible.
18 matches
Mail list logo