I've seen where people use hidden DIV's that show/hide and who's content
changes depending on the function at hand...  That works REALLY well.  Just
an insight.  I do think that "popup" style windows have a place in function
and can be convenient.  It's in a mixed spot for me. 


---
Josh Withrow 
System Administrator
Newark, Delaware
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Direct: 800-873-8932 x237
        302-454-8511 x237




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Cordover
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 9:27 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] scribbles

Hi Bob,

You make a good point.  But the reason I don't use new windows isn't
accesibility.  It's an irritation at having new windows opened for me.
 Being a firefox user, I open in a new tab when I want to and in the
current otherwise.  People know what they want, generally, and are
able to perform that actoin.  The only popular non-tabbed browser is
IE 6, where one can always open in a new window if one wants.

The case for mini-popups (smaller sized windows, sized through the
javascript window.open()) is somewhat different - indeed they can
often be quite useful.  But if you're just opening a new window
because it's what you want - I don't consider it useful.

My two cents.

mjec
-- 
http://mine.mjec.net/

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:48:17 -0000, designer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm not 'doing a blog', but have started to put down some thoughts about
> various areas of this 'new philosophy' which have me (as a newcomer of
only
> 4 months to 'standards') totally confused. The first endeavour concerns
the
> classic - opening new windows.  My scribbling can be seen at:
> 
> http://www.betasite.fsnet.co.uk/comment/scribblings.html
> 
> I have not put this up to bring down the wrath of the evangelists, nor to
> cause a list war, but to express my confusion and hopefully promote some
> <em>reasoned</em> debate amongst intelligent web design folk.
> 
> I am genuinely confused by this, but am open minded and amenable to being
> convinced.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bob McClelland,
> Cornwall (U.K.)
> www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to