I'd argue that headings after the content they 'head' fails the how
it will appear without style sheets test.
If styling's an issue, dig into your CSS selector toolbox for things
like adjacent selectors (depending on browser support requirements)
or, failing that, give it a 'listhead' class and
Hi Mike,
Even if you're not an Eclipse fan Aptana is still worth a shot (I say this as
it shares a lot of common code/is a plugin for Eclipse)
While it feels heavier than Dreamweaver it has pretty nice completion and is
aware of up to date syntax. If you want to work with markup in it as well
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Chris Vickery
chris.vick...@oaic.gov.au wrote:
We’ve got some flat forms on our site, ie. They are not interactive forms,
and have no submit button. They are indicating that it’s a check list that
can be ticked once the page is printed.
Hi Chris,
Can you use a
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Paul Novitski p...@juniperwebcraft.com wrote:
A few quick notes:
1) Phone number formats vary from place to place, but in North America at
least the convention is to insert spacing or punctuation between the first
'1' and the area code. I would change
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Thierry Koblentz
thierry.koble...@gmail.com wrote:
-moz is a vendor prefix (not CSS3)
Actually, vendor prefixes are a part of both CSS 2.1
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#vendor-keywords as well as the
CSS3 working draft... they're for proprietary
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Koblentz
thierry.koble...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Thierry Koblentz
thierry.koble...@gmail.com wrote:
-moz is a vendor prefix (not CSS3)
Actually, vendor prefixes are a part of both CSS 2.1
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:16 PM, David Dorward da...@dorward.me.uk wrote:
On 4 Feb 2010, at 03:29, Joshua Street wrote:
The prefix may be part of it to address parsing issues, but - afaik - that
does not make these extensions CSS properties.
Indeed - yet therein lies the frustration
Adding to what Tim said,
It's possible that you're experiencing problems with Helvetica just because
of a typo (you had written Helvitica). Also, it does not come with Windows
Vista or Microsoft Office.
Hope this helps!
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Tim Snadden li...@snadden.com wrote:
On
Why not just use a transitional doctype?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Robin Gorry rob...@xplore.net wrote:
Hi All,
I am putting together a basic cross browser wysiwyg using the object
element instead of an iframe to display the html, as the object element is
standards compliant.
http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/all-older.html
That's the official source.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks for your replies to this thread last week. I'm on a PC today
and trying to get both versions of Firefox running, the only issue is,
On 11/7/07, Mohamed Jama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could always open the page in word document and if everything looks
fine there it will look fine in outlook 2007 since its using MS Word to
render!
Problem with that is potential differences between Word HTML rendering
2003 - 2007. I
On 11/7/07, Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has found a clever way of testing your HTML
emails for Outlook 2007? I don't have Vista and can't see myself
buying it just yet!
Office 2007 runs fine on XP, with the new stupid Word rendering engine
and all. And
without hardware accelleration... which it
might have, but not that I've heard of. I seem to recall a friend
using his Wii to playback Youtube content, so it certainly can deal
with video in some capacity... just don't go pushing tremendous frame
rates or high-def H264 content ;-)
--
Joshua Street
into the 30thousand pixel padding void the technique
depends upon.
The heights are fluid, the widths is fixed.
Am I barking up the wrong tree?
Any help appreciated!
Josh
--
Joshua Street
http://josh.st/blog/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
is that much more painful).
--
Joshua Street
http://josh.st/blog/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
--
Joshua Street
http://josh.st/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
***
List
it.
--
Joshua Street
http://josh.st/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
ABN 64 515 086 181
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
/span
/p
There are a range of other possibilities listed on that page, also.
In most real-world practice, most websites use non-breaking spaces
extensively. This is, obviously, less than ideal in terms of unbloated
semantic markup!
--
Joshua Street
http://josh.st/blog/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
as an alternative...
I have no answer.
:P
Josh
--
Joshua Street
http://josh.st/blog/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join
a visual form of communication.
--
Joshua Street
http://josh.st/blog/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL
On 3/26/07, Stuart Foulstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody mentioned nesting flowcharts (whatever that means: a flowchart is a
flowchart).
Well, no, but you'd have to nest *L's to represent recursion in a
flowchart. The flowchart is recursive, therefore the
definition/unordered/ordered list
in Canberra actually cares... which they won't).
--
Joshua Street
http://josh.st/blog/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join
really looks a lot like it should be a list... just a
thought :-)
Josh
--
Joshua Street
http://joahua.com/blog/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
On 3/13/06, sime [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have never had a problem with the uppercase not working in strict.
Maybe I'm not defining strict correctly. Here is a test page which works
in FF,IE6: http://urbits.com/_/test.php
You're serving it as text/html.
On 3/13/06, sime [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rephrased, what are the different situations in which you'd use HTML4 over
XHTML1? So far
I've been led to believe (outside of this list) that XHTML is a step forward.
You're serving your XHTML as text/html, so it's effectively being
parsed as HTML
On 3/13/06, Jay Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have also read (no personal first hand knowledge) that there can be
issues between using DOM/DHTML scripts and XHTML. I don't know what
these issues are but why invite trouble.
This arises from non-DOM methods, which are often much simpler to
On 3/12/06, Jay Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am open to other suggestions from members though.
http://cat-scan.net/ (but this uses flat-files rather than a database).
--
Joshua Street
http://joahua.com/blog/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
On 3/9/06, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Site:
http://69.94.122.44/new.php?/caribbean/category/antiqua/
No help there right now, coz I'm at home and without access to IE,
BUT... I do have a bug report for you.
Firefox 1.0.x/Linux (and presumably on every other platform, and
probably
On 3/7/06, kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would i target a:hover on the following links?
I tried a few things but cant get down to the classes(one, two).
div id=navcontainershort
ul
li a href=# class=onebla bla/a/li
On 3/4/06, Jens Brueckmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a font for the web that has a distinction between the
uppercase letter O and the number 0.
If such a font exist, which is it?
Georgia uses pretty much the same shape for o, 0 and O, but lower-case
is small, zero is bigger, and capital is
On 3/4/06, Vicki Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My own main bugbear is in product serial numbers where there is a
mixture of numbers and letters. It's all very well knowing that O is
rounder than 0, but if you don't have one of each to compare, it can
be very hit-and-miss. I'm sure there must
On 3/1/06, Joseph R. B. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It validates and renders correctly on FF 1.5, Opera 8.5 and IE 6.0. The
only issue I discovered so far is a layout break when I zoom the text to
unbelievable sizes in FF.
Unbelievable sizes here being one step DOWN (decreasing font size)
On 2/22/06, Terrence Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 Feb 2006, at 2:50 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Outlook users should ...switch to a better mail client that isn't
broken.
Outllok can be configured to send plain text can't it?
I think Lachlan meant that + bottom-quoting?
On 2/18/06, Paul Sturgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/16/06, Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The BIGGEST thing I can see wrong with this site is the image map.
Obviously the link areas aren't regular shapes, so even if you were to
use a UL (navigation list) with positioned LI
On 2/17/06, kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://63.134.237.108/
any feedback at all greatly appreciated
Table-based layout? Was that guy looking at the same site? Looks
pretty layout-table free to me...
You're missing a H1, which isn't great... wrap the header image in an
H1 element
One other thing... typo, your are here » above the imagemap.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
On 2/17/06, kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can i get a second opinion on felix's advice?
It must've been offlist, but I'd guess it was about fonts ;-) My
second opinion is I agree... he's generally right about such things!
**
The discussion
://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
On 2/9/06, Stephen Stagg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not meaningless, It is more readable than HTML, to a human. And
when computers start to need to read websites automatically...
Humans read content, computers read markup. Humans don't read HTML
(excusing, perhaps, the rare breed that
Yep... I agree, hence web [...] recommendations are actually about
rather than accessibility is actually about. Specs are
purpose-agnostic (see pages that validate but are a semantic blight on
the face of the web)... ironically, guidelines (human-language,
practical documents) are actually more
On 2/8/06, Al Sparber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's another approach you're sure not to like :-)
http://www.projectseven.com/csslab/swapclass/outline/
Hmm... it'd be nicer if there weren't anchor tags in there/the H3 were
used directly. Not being amazingly JavaScript saavy, is there a
On 2/8/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
heretic wrote:
...
Maybe the standards community prefer to ride ponies instead of real
race-horses? ;-)
Must be something to do with keeping nearer the earth. Opera spoils
web developers, and makes Internet Explorer (and Firefox, to a lesser
Works fine here with Firefox 1.0.7 + web developer toolbar,
irrespective of whether or not the top margin of #header is set to 0.
On 2/6/06, Paula Petrik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm doing something fairly simple. The problem arises when I apply
margins to my #header. When I simply apply
Yes, but can you use an anchor fragment to link to a point in an
Acrobat document?
The other thing is why would we even bother with that when we have
hypertext? On one site I did recently, the client wanted a PDF
brochure with _identical_ information to what was in hypertext
included. The PDF
On 2/4/06, kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well someone here (no names :) told me a while back that
the *hmtl hack was ie future proof so maybe not.
Well, it is. It's not going to affect any more versions of Internet
Explorer (this has been known for some time now), hence any rules you
put
Yes, it's a good thing. PDF's aren't web pages. This is the
distinction between a web site and a web application: applications are
'expected' to have 'application-like' behaviour (such as new windows,
etc.). Also, PDF content rarely has the _behaviour_ of a web page
(rich hyperlink
Ah, righto. Linux user here, apologies... it's obviously simpler on
other desktop systems ;-)
On 2/3/06, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Street wrote:
Also I wasn't aware of way to override browser object settings for PDF
files easily -- by all means feel free to correct me
]
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
Microsoft has newsgroups for identifying and reporting bugs. I blogged
a for/against thing on IE7 preview beta 2 after having played with it
for a morning, http://joahua.com/blog/2006/02/01/ie7-beta-2 , and
discovered a zoom bug that doesn't play nice with CSS backgrounds. Bug
is here:
For the navigation, you can put all your nav images into the one file
so that they all load at once, then use background-position to make
them sit in place.
As for making things readable before the background images download,
how about setting a background colour as well? That way if users have
. But the subdomain
thing comes into it, too, as well as the fact that this equates to
providing different versions for different devices.
1. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/TLD
2. http://wap.yahoo.com.au/sunrise/ -- note the evil subdomain
Regards,
Josh
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61
That web patterns thing people were bouncing around in here a month or
so back? I've lost the address... if someone else doesn't post it,
it's in the archives somewhere... probably something really obvious
like webpatterns.org... Ah, yes, that's it.
http://webpatterns.org/
On 2/2/06, Peter
Regrettably not. I'd also love some way to associate a header element
with content, much like fieldset's legend element does, but
unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately, because it'd be potentially
hellish to make work consistently with some automated content
management stuff!) no such thing
1) HTML 4.01 Strict, unless you've got really ambitious plans and a
very good idea what user agents will be in play: keeping in mind
Internet Explorer doesn't support XHTML served as
application/xhtml+xml, so it's still going to be parsed as straight
HTML in that browser.
2) So far as I'm aware,
and look up to. Just because they are using it doesn't make it right.
All the best,
Jay Gilmore
Developer/Consultant
Affordable Websites and Marketing Solutions for Real Small Business.
SmashingRed Web Marketing
P) 902.529.0651
E) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Joshua Street
http
Practically speaking, it's a good idea to reset font-size, padding and
margin on * at the start of your CSS file. This does help improve
consistancy somewhat.
* {
padding:0;
margin:0;
font-size:100.01%;
}
Then, obviously, you can style individual elements from that, and you
know what the default
That's still going to be 1em of whatever 1em becomes by the time you
get down to #editableArea (i.e. 1em of (x) on #editableArea of (y) on
#body of (z) on #html), isn't it?
On 2/1/06, Seona Bellamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One possible solution would be not so much to have 'no style' but to
On 2/1/06, Peter Ottery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cant replicate it here using firefox 1.0.2 and win xp. you may have
fixed it..?
Nope, but it occurs less frequently on FF1.0.x/XP than on other OSs,
and I've only actually looked at it in Firefox 1.0.7 in XP (I figured
it'd be relatively
trying to change the
way non-professional web publishers think about the media they're
creating/the means by which they are creating it, so the how are you
making money doing THAT? argument for being generally dismissive of
non-web-standardites is something to be avoided.
--
Joshua Street
http
On 1/30/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Street wrote:
I'm assured it's not going to move!
I wouldn't believe that. In fact, here's a perfect example of why 301
shouldn't have been used. On Today Tonight (another 7 network program,
for those of you not in Australia
Many thanks. I'd only tested Opera in 8.5x (because, IMO, it's
reasonable to assume if people are using Opera they're probably going
to be people who bother upgrading their software!), so I'll be sure to
take a look :-)
On 1/30/06, Justin Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/30/06, Joshua Street
Two quick things. Your primary navigation list doesn't need to use
pipe separators. It'd be much better to just use borders with CSS to
achieve this. Also, maybe consider a skip to login as well as your
skip to main content link. It makes things faster than tabbing
through all the links between
On 1/30/06, Anders Nawroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the toggle function have to be connected to a a element, or do
JS-enabled screen readers recognize onClick events attached to other
elements?
To add to this question, what happens where screen readers with
JavaScript result in an
Maybe give #169; a shot instead of copy; ... not certain, but it may
help. Love the design, by the way.
On 1/31/06, Kara Spellman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This my first website using CSS. I've gotten most of the bugs out of
it except for one on the home page. For some reason the copyright
Just out of curiosity, what about Tick this box if you don't want to
receive massive amounts of spam? Is it really anti-checked box, or
anti-default-opt-in? Seems pretty... open to abuse and/or
re-interpretation, unless it's the latter.
On 1/31/06, Philippe Wittenbergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are floated) in order to trigger the
scroll thingy. That's a technical term...
On 1/30/06, Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many thanks. I'd only tested Opera in 8.5x (because, IMO, it's
reasonable to assume if people are using Opera they're probably going
to be people who bother upgrading
On 1/29/06, Rene Saarsoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is one usability problem still: the contents of th elements
are centered by default in most browsers, making the table look like
this:
1 Fruits Add Edit Delete
1.1 Apple Add Edit Delete
, is there a known FIX for a Firefox bug of this nature?
Any other feedback is also welcomed, but especially on that point :-)
Regards,
Joshua Street
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
/30/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Street wrote:
http://sunrisefamily.com.au/current/content/
The site looks good, it's a huge improvement over all the other 7
network web sites.
However, one issue I have with it is why when I go to:
http://sunrisefamily.com.au/
I get
Select with Optgroups?
Tables with (assuming two levels), a structure like this:
tr
th id=fruit colspan=2Fruit/thtdAdd/td tdEdit/td tdDelete/td
/tr
tr
td/tdth headers=fruitApple/thtdAdd/td tdEdit/td
tdDelete/td
/tr
etc?
The other thing (this list is definitely the wrong place for me to say
, nothing
more.
On 1/29/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Street wrote:
The other thing (this list is definitely the wrong place for me to say
this) is if this is for a content management system or the like, where
the client's browsing capabilities are a well known quantity,
What
I've never read about setting the subject with title (unless you're
using JavaScript to do magic to the href?), but imagine it doesn't
much matter. I've NEVER encountered a mail client that choked if you
fed it a subject as well... even if not all parse that into the
Subject field. Hence, from an
Hmm I'd strongly contest a definition list. Maybe nested UL's would be
better... but Item 1 cannot be sensibly/reasonably _defined_ as Add,
or Edit, or Delete.
On 1/27/06, Paul Novitski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas,
I could argue either list or table, but I'd be inclined to make it a
=
document.documentElement.scrollHeight+'px'; }, 1);
setTimeout(function(){ onresize = fixIE6AbsPos; }, 100);
}
}
HTH,
Kay.
--
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
On 1/23/06, Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least, I'm fairly certain the absolutely positioned elements
Yep, that'd be the PNG files. Something to do with saving Gamma. My
usual workaround is to open + re-save using the GIMP... it works
though I'm still not quite sure why!
Josh
On 1/24/06, Joseph R. B. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys and Gals,
Here's a neat one for you. If you look at
At least, I'm fairly certain the absolutely positioned elements are
causing the problem(s).
I can't give an example page (NDA, and it's too complex to bother
recreating -- the complexity is probably part of the reason it's so
bad when text is selected/copied), just wondering if anyone else has
On 1/19/06, Richard Stephenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use the onclick event;
a.onclick = function() {
alert('not going there!');return false;
}
Its not an issue of standards it's in the javascript not the html.
Richard
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
# Implementing
Definition list. It's a list of definitions ;-)
On 1/20/06, Pat Boens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
What would be the best way to create a glossary: a table ? a definition
list? something else?
Thanks for your expert input.
Pat
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808
Is it? I'm using AHAH (H = HTML, as opposed to XML) to dynamically
retrieve some content and innerHTML seems infinitely more sensible:
the content being pulled in has an indeterminate number of paragraphs,
so short of parsing the incoming document for paragraphs, recreating
elements, and setting
deal of JS
experience -- me) somewhat redundant, surely.
And yup, I'll be serving this one as HTML :)
Thanks,
Josh
Joshua Street said:
do people consider it okay to use
Supposedly faster than DOM methods, and usually requires less code.
Personally, I don't see it as a problem for HTML
Good to hear you solved it, but one other thing. I observed in Firefox
1.0.x/Linux that the borders on your left navigation items
appear/disappear at certain zoom settings. This might be something to
do with the Flash items on the lower right, because they flickered
around where the nav items were
Hi all,
I've got a page that has a print stylesheet, and two elements of
important (i.e. the things you'd want to print) content. One is a list
of items, whilst the other element is a kind of More information
area (linked by XMLHttpRequest if JS is enabled).
In the More information bit, there's
/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
We're waaay OT now, but I can't resist just posting this last message
for those thinking about Photoshop-GIMP migration. GIMPshop! is a
re-working of The GIMP's interface to make it more Photoshop-like. I
haven't used it myself, because I recently went (was coerced into
going) the other way (i.e.
Well, if Photoshop won't open them, the GIMP certainly can. Then it's
just cutting it apart like you would had you received any other flat
file, I suppose! Of course, if you need backgrounds then a kindly
worded email to the client requesting the source file with layers,
etc., would probably be
On 1/14/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tables for forms is ok in some cases, forms can be considered tabular.
This one has always confused me. There is a linear relationship
between a field's label and the field proper, yes, but how does one
mark that up as a table? SHOULD that be
anywhere that it's impossible to use thead, which seems a
fair benchmark of what is most definitely a table. Maybe not... your
example's use of the scope attribute makes it all seem remarkably
sensible!
Thanks,
Josh
On 1/14/06, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Street wrote
Nope. Only, I'd add that there are existing apps out there that will
fall into various server-side languages to do intelligent replacement
of linebreaks - paragraphs, smart quotes, etc. KSES, used by
WordPress (or at least it used to be) is one such for the PHP langauge
(
or similar so I
don't have to hand-code each link in my menu?
Thanks!
-H
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
Love the design, but just one thing about the background.
The dotted line fluctuates at the edge of each repetition, because
there are dots right on the edges. I don't know if you can
add/subtract a pixel in on one side of the graphic easily, or whether
this'll interfere with the other repeating
On 1/9/06, Al Kendall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh,
Is it possible to leave the thumbnails with the main pic instead of
having to go back the the thumbnails each time?
Cheers
Al
Sure thing, there's a fairly simple templating system that lets you do
just that if you so desire.
On
/
Features list: http://cat-scan.net/features.html
Blog: http://blog.cat-scan.net/
Demo: http://demo.cat-scan.net/
Kind regards,
Joshua Street
http://joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org
list-style:none; on the UL should work well... failing that, try
playing with padding: on the list.
On 1/8/06, Artemis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My partner and I have a tagboard on our site and it looks greate in FF,
but when you view in IE there are round bullets. Can someone help me get
rid
http://www.usability.com.au/resources/tables.cfm is a great resource.
I find particularly interesting
http://www.usability.com.au/resources/tables.cfm#very , as it
demonstrates that accessible tables needn't be meagre and can, in
fact, contain quite a lot of structured information. It sounds as
. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Street wrote:
This is a seriously odd problem, resulting from Photoshop's PNG
output/Firefox 1,0.x's PNG decoder (I think).
Test case at
http://joahua.com/blog/2006/01/04/photoshopfirefox-10x-and-the-case-of-the-mystery-line
Anyone seen
This is a seriously odd problem, resulting from Photoshop's PNG
output/Firefox 1,0.x's PNG decoder (I think).
Test case at
http://joahua.com/blog/2006/01/04/photoshopfirefox-10x-and-the-case-of-the-mystery-line
Anyone seen this before?
Note that the size of both images is 210px: in the
at the minute (though generally they're faster to adopt newer
versions).
Apologies for a slightly application/not-web-standards related
question... all in the name of testing ;-)
Regards,
Josh
--
Joshua Street
http://joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
Ah, yes, that's what I was trying to do. If I just install both I end
up getting plugins overlapping between installs, and can't run both at
once (I think because of the way it calls new windows?)
Thanks!
Josh
On 1/3/06, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roberto Gorjão wrote:
To me
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
