[WSG] .htm include file into another .htm
Hi, I want to include a file to be included into about 10 htm pages, and to save time me updating them individually, i want to use a include file. Using standards, which is the best way to achieve this: 1. !--#include virtual=/included.htm -- 2. !--#include virtual=included.htm -- 3. !--#include file=included.html -- Any body have any experience of this? thanks, Jim -- Kevin (Jim) Callender http://www.jayonline.co.uk/ +44 (0)7888 701 588 +44 (0)1273 818 546 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] use for callender creates
use for callender creates - Donna, That's why I mention the measure thingy and industrial standards. I get the feeling that's something companies appreciate from a business point of view. Several of my coworkers and I recently gave a talk on when we chose to use Web standards (and when we didn't). We created a handout with some links to articles on using Web standards. Maybe one of the articles would be useful to you? Some of the reasons we chose to move to XHTML/CSS instead of table-based design: * Faster load-times. * Smaller page sizes. (One site I did went from CSS-P to a table-based template upon the customer's request, and the page sizes all tripled.) * Better accessibility. * Greater visibility in Web searches, * Better compatibility with browsers. * Future compatible with upcoming standards. I'll be happy to provide additional information if you like. Good luck with your situation. Kim Nylander -- These are some of the articles we used in the handout. Maybe they would have something useful? Why Use Web Standards? Buy standards compliant Web sites (W3C QA article) http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/07/WebAgency-Requirements The Way Forward with Web Standards (MACCAWS) http://www.maccaws.org/kit/way-forward/ What are Web Standards and Why Should I Use Them? (WaSP) http://www.webstandards.org/learn/faq/ Web Standards Switch (W3C QA) http://www.w3.org/QA/2003/03/web-kit Using Standards Learn the Standards (WaSP) http://www.webstandards.org/learn/standards/ What Every Web Site Owner Should Know About Standards: A Web Standards Primer (MACCAWS) http://www.maccaws.org/kit/primer/ Making your website valid: a step by step guide. (W3C QA) http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/09/Step-by-step My Web Site is Standard. And yours? (W3C QA) http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/Web-Quality ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] liquid widths
You may want to check this in 800 x 600 you have horiz scroll bar. The original doesn’t. thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kvnmcwebn Sent: 03 December 2005 00:10 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] liquid widths Im only starting to play around with liquid layouts. I like this 3 column example that uses min widths. For non-mozilla browsers it uses horizontal rules to set the min scaling of the boxes. It then hides these from browser that support min width, it seems a bit reduntant to me but. http://www.saila.com/usage/layouts/saila_layout.html Anyway i started modifying the layout to have a fixed width left column. So far it looks allright in ff but im not sure about it because i set the widths visually and they dont really add up to 100%. Is this ok? http://www.mcmonagle.biz/finaloti/index3.html http://www.mcmonagle.biz/finaloti/finalstyle.css ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.11/191 - Release Date: 02/12/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.11/191 - Release Date: 02/12/2005 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
