Re: [WSG] Re: Searching for standards information

2008-10-26 Thread Michael Cordover
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 18:49, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 25, 2008, at 11:35 PM, Elizabeth Spiegel wrote: In Australia, HREOC is responsible for administering various anti-discrimination legislation, including the Disability Discrimination Act. [...] One form of discrimination is

Re: [WSG] Marking Up Poems

2008-06-19 Thread Michael Cordover
I would suggest that this is pre. Poetry is generally so display-specific that you couldn't hope to mark it up, I'd say. Michael On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 19:08, James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A question was raised at work today 'How do you mark up a poem'. I looked into it but found

Re: [WSG] NoScript Help Please!

2008-05-21 Thread Michael Cordover
Hey, My suggestion would be td class=..a href=...img src=.. alt=.. //a/td And attaching the onclick event to a with return false; to stop it executing when there is javascript. The alternative is to have an onload function that puts the image outside the a and deletes the a element. Both of

[WSG] MSIE causing trouble

2007-03-04 Thread Michael Cordover
be massively appreciated - I'm stuck. Thanks, Michael Cordover -- *** List Guidelines: Unsubscribe: Help

Re: [WSG] MSIE causing trouble

2007-03-04 Thread Michael Cordover
There is a file:, linked from an IE conditional comment and contains exactly that rule already. Further suggestions? Thanks, Michael On 3/4/07, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Cordover wrote: I've got a page at which comes up

Re: [WSG] MSIE causing trouble

2007-03-04 Thread Michael Cordover
I am the world's biggest fool. Thankyou for saving me. Regards, Michael On 3/5/07, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Cordover wrote: There is a file:, linked from an IE conditional comment and contains exactly that rule already. Well, I didn't use that - or any

Re: [WSG] unobtrusive js help

2007-03-02 Thread Michael Cordover
On 3/2/07, Paul Novitski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please generate the notice server-side -- or hard-code it into the html -- so it shows up for everyone viewing the content. In addition to Paul's technically valid note (with which I, a noscript user, wholeheartedly agree), there's also a legal

Re: [WSG] *Why* doesn't Google validate? was New logo scheme was talking points for standards

2005-12-08 Thread Michael Cordover
I think that Google's failure to validate may be due to the simple issue of bandwidth. Certainly on the main page, the whole source is compressed and effectively minimised. Bandwidth is expensive these days. Inserting a doctype, separating style data, that sort of thing, takes a lot of

Re: [WSG] Will HTML be nicer to PHP than XHTML?

2005-06-27 Thread Michael Cordover
recommend you look on IRC, specifically channel ##php. Regards, Michael Cordover -- ** The discussion list for See for some

Re: [WSG] there is no attribute name

2005-05-14 Thread Michael Cordover
Hi Thomas, On 5/15/05, Thomas Ditmars [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 14-May-05 13:47, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: a href=#contentgo to content/a ... div id=content ... Does this also apply to HTML 4.01 Strict? I guess my actual question is: What is the proper way of coding '#anchor-name' links

Re: [WSG] CSS3.0

2005-02-16 Thread Michael Cordover
CSS 3 Backgrounds and Borders module is in Working Draft stage. details the mailing list which will allow you to make suggestions. HTH, Michael On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:31:20 +, David R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just out of curiosity... Is

Re: [WSG] XHTML Strict alternative to ol start=11

2005-02-07 Thread Michael Cordover
See, I'd say a table or a definition list. I think I'm one of the very few people who actually supports the loss of the start= attribute. An ordered list means there is an order, *not* that there is anything particular assocated with that order. So, think about it in terms of set theory, if you

Re: [WSG] Default state of radio buttons. (Maybe OT?)

2005-02-01 Thread Michael Cordover
IIRC though, while RFC 1866 says exactly one the checked attribute is optional in W3C guidelines. HTML 4.01 (and thus also the XHTML 1 series) state: [] If no radio button in a set sharing the same control name is initially on, user agent

Re: [WSG] standards in local government

2005-02-01 Thread Michael Cordover
Hi, I was even more surprised to find an entire Australian government department website not only uses an effective table-free design, not only has a website which is at least partially accessible, not only does it collapse well when styling is removed, it is also XHTML 1.0 conformant!

Re: [WSG] First Thoughts On Layout...

2005-01-30 Thread Michael Cordover
Hi Chris, Looks pretty good to me. Looks very good in fact. Just one tiny niggle. If images are turned off but style sheets are used, your footer links are invisible, as is your title link! I'm fairly certain this isn't a good thing ;). This is why the img alt= method is generally used,


2005-01-29 Thread Michael Cordover
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:14:49 -0500, James Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:17:14 -0500, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The home page for this site has 100 HTML errors, 11 CSS errors, uses inline styles, and sets the fonts in points. that site was not generated

Re: [WSG] scribbles

2005-01-24 Thread Michael Cordover
Hi Bob, You make a good point. But the reason I don't use new windows isn't accesibility. It's an irritation at having new windows opened for me. Being a firefox user, I open in a new tab when I want to and in the current otherwise. People know what they want, generally, and are able to

Re: [WSG] Re: Advantage of word-wrapping?

2005-01-23 Thread Michael Cordover
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:23:58 -, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In both cases, UAs will render the content exactly the same... I was wondering if there were any advantages to the former... I heard something about some obscure UAs ignoring content beyond the 80th Column or