I would do the following - http://trov.ath.cx/comm/~test/WSG/sportscenters.html
The reason for the hard line breaks in the address is because it is
part of the content, so when styles are removed, it still has the
appropriate structure.
**
The
Yes, your option, just marked-up completely and hopefully correctly!
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:03:23 +0100, Patrick H. Lauke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trovster wrote:
I would do the following - http://trov.ath.cx/comm/~test/WSG/sportscenters.html
My option nr 2) then ;-)
Agree, the line
I have started a little site for the promotion of Firefox
http://firefox.trovster.com
But as you can see it's pretty thin at the moment.
I have added my favourite extensions, with links and short
descriptions to the customise section, and links to other resources
in the links section (funny
There's browse happy campaign - http://browsehappy.com/ which talks
about experiences from changing from IE to Opera/Mozilla/Firefox and
Safari
Trev
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Congratulations!
Valid CSS!This document validates as CSS!
Is what I get when I validate the CSS directly, or through the site!!
Dunno what's going on. I quickly checked and you've got a generic font
on the 3 font-families. I'd just say it's the validator being stupid.
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004
Here are all my resources I use so far...
http://www.trovster.com/resources.html
Still with a lot to sort out...!!
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:13:40 +0800, Lyn Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Russ - yes, there are some great articles around and I have
printed out so many and
It is a good start, especially using unordered lists for the menus at the side
But some of the things like summary=layout aren't too clever... and
it isn't valid HTML 4.01 transiltional, fails on one point...
TD width=99% background=Images/logospacer.gifnbsp;/TD
Still got spacer gif...
Agreed
Ok, let me see if this mailling list posting is working now...
First of all I like the design, but can't understand any of the content!!
About the code...
h1 id=header I was initially going to say you don't need the
id=header part, but noticed you had another level one heading
further down. I