the CSS Validation. You left a few items on your localhost.
Zach // zachinglis.com
At 30/1/06 11:26: Darren West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
Please can you review and give comment on the following:
http://ta.rt-ms.net/2/properties.html
http://ta.rt-ms.net/2/propertydetails.html
Thanks
Bah, problems already. When you use dead centering in CSS (i.e.,
background: url(picture) center center no-repeat;), it ignores the
second center, even though it is perfectly valid CSS.
The coming soon page on my site (byzach.com) is an example.
- Zach
Ted Drake wrote:
Firefox has just
Ah. Thanks!
- Zach
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On 1 Dec 2005, at 12:36 pm, Zach wrote:
Bah, problems already. When you use dead centering in CSS (i.e.,
background: url(picture) center center no-repeat;), it ignores the
second center, even though it is perfectly valid CSS.
Firefox 1.5
Jeffrey Zeldman's is a good one.
I've heard Eric Meyers is too.
On 16 Oct 2005, at 22:08, Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
Although I've worked with CSS for quite sometime, I've just
scratched the surface of advanced CSS solutions. After ogling
Amazon for the better part of the morning I've only
Design crituque wise:
Make it center rather than oddly positioned.
make the grey text darker, remember people of the older generation
are more likely to be reading it and thus may have eyes that are
statring to fail.
is that blue on red? thats really wrong.. stick with a light light
pink
It makes things easier to associate in my opinion. At the end of the day its just punctuation... like using a full stop to separate content. It may help too when the CSS is turned off.Zach Inglis // www.zachinglis.comOn 13 Oct 2005, at 02:18, McLaughlin, Gail G wrote: We are establishing Web
http://www.zachinglis.com/ZachInglis.html
The h3's I've tried it with them OUTSIDE the h3/h3 tags but
that doesn't work either. At the moment i'm only modding the top post
before you ask.
**
The discussion list for
I can't seem to fix the UTF problem. Any ideas?
On 5 Oct 2005, at 16:13, Bert Doorn wrote:
Not sure what exactly you're asking, but:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A//
www.zachinglis.com/ZachInglis.html
It's broken code, which may explain why you are having problems.
Joe Clarke did a speech on it earlier this year at @media... his
slides can be found at http://joeclark.org/atmedia/atmedia-NOTES-2.html
On 5 Oct 2005, at 16:53, Mike Brown wrote:
Hey
I don't think there is, but is there any sort of consensus of the
use of
zoom layouts?
BBEdit had a / at the end, I don't know why the source didn't. Fixed
now though. Cheers
On 5 Oct 2005, at 17:36, Bert Doorn wrote:
G'day
I can't seem to fix the UTF problem. Any ideas?
If you mean the first of the 35 validation errors, have a look at
what the validator suggests:
For an article i'm writing I need a list who have turned their
website into Web Standard compliant websites.
Such as Yahoo!
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for
I am perfectly aware of that.
On 4 Oct 2005, at 20:55, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Zach Inglis wrote:
For an article i'm writing I need a list who have turned their
website into Web Standard compliant websites.
Just a word of warning: web standards compliant and accessible
Fair doos. No, I am using Apple's Mail.
Anyway, Jeremy ended up helping me. Cheers though.
http://www.zachinglis.com/web-accessibility/web-standards-as-it-is/
On 4 Oct 2005, at 22:13, Paul Bennett wrote:
(1) Trim your posts
(2) That reply would be better off-list
Tip to 'pay' for this post
things though -
not too many IT qualifications around here!
I just wish I had more of those cheques.
And, yeah, who *are* the top designers?!
On 26/09/2005, at 12:24 PM, Zach Inglis wrote:
If you're that worried about qualifications. There are university
courses etc. I've found a lot of firms
They probally meant setting it in CSS. Of course it's possible putting it over the top.Have you tried simple things such as z-index?Do you have a screenshot of what happens for those of us who have yet to install Opera.On 26 Sep 2005, at 00:57, Jon Dawson wrote:Hello all, I read recently that it
If you're that worried about qualifications. There are university
courses etc. I've found a lot of firms look first at qualifcations
before portfolio. Silly but it happens.
On 26 Sep 2005, at 01:13, Nick Gleitzman wrote:
On 26 Sep 2005, at 9:50 AM, Duncan Heal wrote:
Incidentally, is
help
**
Zach Inglis // www.zachinglis.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
Disregard my last statement, I got the wrong end of the stick
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
18 matches
Mail list logo
