Re: [WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-27 Thread csslist
yes I know that But you are not getting it, which is fine, you don't have too, I do. We know some or a lot of people it wont fit which is a given. But your option is to make them page scroll and mine is to window scroll so that they DON'T have to scroll all the way up to use the menu. Does that

Re: [WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-26 Thread csslist
its designed to fit on a 800 x 600 and it fits right down to the bottom of the scroll area, sure the bottom of the reels arent showing and thats fine. "So now one has to scroll both the window and the inner element in order to get to the content. Cute." Ok smart ass, thats 1 page that has a

Re: [WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-26 Thread csslist
"I could show you a million websites with the background graphic positioned at the bottom of the content."gee, really??? now wayyy!!! I don't recall asking you for your opinon on it and I didn't ask for a site check and unless you are paying the bill for the site then I will listen to the people

Re: [WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-26 Thread csslist
suggestions and problemsOn 11/25/05, csslist wrote: its designed to fit on a 800 x 600 and it fits right down to the bottom of the scroll area, sure the bottom of the reels arent showing and thats fine.This is a 1:1 image of my browser viewport:http://space.rdpdesign.com/reels.jpgNotice the height

Re: [WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-26 Thread csslist
Then I appologize Christian, This is due like today and I'm really growchy but it's what they want and if it needs changed then we change it. I was opposed to the idea just like you are now but it's grown on me and I kinda like it. But you gotta remember we are targettting their main audience

Re: [WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-25 Thread csslist
its designed to fit on a 800 x 600 and it fits right down to the bottom of the scroll area, sure the bottom of the reels arent showing and thats fine. "So now one has to scroll both the window and the inner element in order to get to the content. Cute." Ok smart ass, thats 1 page that has a

Re: [WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-25 Thread csslist
"I could show you a million websites with the background graphic positioned at the bottom of the content."gee, really??? now wayyy!!! I don't recall asking you for your opinon on it and I didn't ask for a site check and unless you are paying the bill for the site then I will listen to the people

Re: [WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-25 Thread csslist
suggestions and problemsOn 11/25/05, csslist wrote: its designed to fit on a 800 x 600 and it fits right down to the bottom of the scroll area, sure the bottom of the reels arent showing and thats fine.This is a 1:1 image of my browser viewport:http://space.rdpdesign.com/reels.jpgNotice the height

Re: [WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-25 Thread csslist
Then I appologize Christian, This is due like today and I'm really growchy but it's what they want and if it needs changed then we change it. I was opposed to the idea just like you are now but it's grown on me and I kinda like it. But you gotta remember we are targettting their main audience

Re: [WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-25 Thread csslist
yes I know that But you are not getting it, which is fine, you don't have too, I do. We know some or a lot of people it wont fit which is a given. But your option is to make them page scroll and mine is to window scroll so that they DON'T have to scroll all the way up to use the menu. Does that

[WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-24 Thread csslist
look at my menu http://65.36.226.10/content/catalog.cfm which is fine until you increase the browsers text size to large then thereare some problems such as overflowing and such and if you use overflow it adds scrollbars even when it's technically not overflowing. Anyone have any good

RE: [WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-24 Thread csslist
I dont know, not sure how to do that but I will look it up. I cant scale the bg to fit because its a one piece fixed size bg thanksFrom: "Stephen Stagg" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 7:25 PMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: RE: [WSG] menu suggestions and problemsCould you

RE: [WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-24 Thread csslist
The site isn't truely fluid as it uses a one piece bgFrom: "Scott Swabey - Lafinboy Productions" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 7:25 PMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: RE: [WSG] menu suggestions and problemsTo make the site truly fluid you'll need to use relative size

RE: [WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-24 Thread csslist
fied in EM (say 1.3EM), the menu would look better at different text-sizes because the menu-item borders would fit better. Stephen From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of csslist Sent: 25 November 2005 00:50 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] menu s

Re: [WSG] menu suggestions and problems

2005-11-24 Thread csslist
and if you take the overflow out the content just flows right on out over the bg and right down the page that would beautiful wouldnt it and I know what you are saying but we didn't want the pages to be big long pages it needed to fit within the browser(and NOT scroll), so your answer would

[WSG] snug a border around diff sized pix

2005-11-15 Thread csslist
I have a div that shows phots dynamically that are different sizes and would like to throw a 1px border aound them, I can't seem to get them to hug the photo, anyone got any good tricks for this?tia

RE: [WSG] snug a border around diff sized pix

2005-11-15 Thread csslist
yup forgot bout those, thanks :)From: "Paul Noone" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 1:05 AMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: RE: [WSG] snug a border around diff sized pix Add a 1px border to either a or img tags within the DIV's #class. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[WSG] color overflow in pc ie fieldset

2005-11-02 Thread csslist
I had this fixed but it seems to be backlook at formhttp://65.36.226.10/content/contact.cfmany suggestions?tia

RE: [WSG] color overflow in pc ie fieldset

2005-11-02 Thread csslist
this is how it is supposed to look, see how there isnt any color above the feildset border.http://www.jamwerx.com/form2.png (on ff mac)where as this one, there is some grey extending up over border towards the top (on ie6 pc)http://www.jamwerx.com/form1.jpgthe form works just there is now some

RE: [WSG] color overflow in pc ie fieldset

2005-11-02 Thread csslist
yeah there is a bg color the png only goes half way down.it was working thats the weird thingFrom: "Paul Noone" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 8:06 PMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: RE: [WSG] color overflow in pc ie fieldset Ah, I see. The background PNG is extending

Re: [WSG] color overflow in pc ie fieldset

2005-11-02 Thread csslist
i tried that and it got really weird!!!From: "Thierry Koblentz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 8:14 PMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] color overflow in pc ie fieldsetcsslist wrote: this is how it is supposed to look, see how there isnt any color above the

[WSG] help on making this link validate

2005-10-31 Thread csslist
I need to get this email link to validate, i am using a coldfusion function to do this and I tried encoding it to a url safe line (urlencodedformat) but jacks it, any other ideas?or any good ideas for hiding emails from spammers that can use a dynamic email

Re: [WSG] help on making this link validate

2005-10-31 Thread csslist
thanks,the way its written im not sure if i can or not, i will try though :)From: "Patrick H. Lauke" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 6:30 PMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] help on making this link validatecsslist wrote: I need to get this email link to validate, i

[WSG] form hidden field ?

2005-10-29 Thread csslist
I have a hidden field in a css styled form and when you view the page it's shown as a line in firefox, any ideas?tiadave

Re: [WSG] form hidden field ?

2005-10-29 Thread csslist
http://65.36.226.10/contact/contact.cfmFrom: Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 2:11 AMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] form hidden field ?Example link?On 10/29/05, csslist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a hidden field in a css styled form an

Re: [WSG] form hidden field ?

2005-10-29 Thread csslist
add a rule to your stylesheet tostop this from appearing.HTH,JoshOn 10/29/05, csslist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://65.36.226.10/contact/contact.cfm From: Joshua Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 2:11 AM To: wsg@webstandard

[WSG] extra eyes on an input:focus ?

2005-10-27 Thread csslist
anyone see why this wont work in ie? works elsewhere but not on ieinput:focus,textarea:focus { background: #ff; color: #27455f; border: 1px solid #ff;}

Re: [WSG] extra eyes on an input:focus ?

2005-10-27 Thread csslist
://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/11997IE doesn't like the :focus pseudo selector.HTH,JoshOn 10/28/05, csslist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: anyone see why this wont work in ie? works elsewhere but not on ie input:focus,textarea:focus { background: #ff; color: #27455f; border: 1px

Re: [WSG] extra eyes on an input:focus ?

2005-10-27 Thread csslist
i put the ie7 hack in and it works fine now.gotta love ieFrom: "csslist" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 8:03 PMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] extra eyes on an input:focus ?hum, i have it working on other sites but now that i think about it

re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] extra eyes on an input:focus ?

2005-10-27 Thread csslist
dont have any links up or nav yet so its kinda hard to tellafter clicking on those what do you think?daveFrom: Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 8:30 PMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] extra eyes on an input:focus ?On 10/28/05, csslist <[EM

[WSG] users changing text sizes

2005-10-24 Thread csslist
like on http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/news/story?id=2202658any good tuts on it anywhere?thanks

Re: [WSG] users changing text sizes

2005-10-24 Thread csslist
thanks :)From: "Terrence Wood" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 8:15 PMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] users changing text sizesyou want a font-size switcher or stylesheet switcher.here's a starting point:http://source.mihelac.org/notebook/styleswitcher/kind

re: SPAM-LOW: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-26 Thread csslist
Have you ever seen anything that microsoft makes that makes anything near compliant code? didnt think so If you are going to use .net and want complient code then you will spend a lot of time going back and tweaking the code to get it to comply. From: Stuart Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday,

RE: SPAM-LOW: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-26 Thread csslist
Your Idea www.fueladvance.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of csslist Sent: Tuesday, 27 September 2005 10:34 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: re: SPAM-LOW: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility Have you ever seen anything that microsoft makes

[WSG] ie css rollovers prob

2005-08-20 Thread csslist
having some probs with getting simple css rollovers to work in ie on this site http://www.elkhornflyrods.com/store/index.cfm menus on right. anyone see anything wrong? (well ok, i mean with rollover code) .linklist{ background: #d5d5d5; border: 1px solid #66; height: auto; left: 0px;

RE: [WSG] ie css rollovers prob

2005-08-20 Thread csslist
i figured that was it but swore it worked on another site which i went back and check and it didnt doh has anyone ever mentioned that ie sux? thanks :)From: "Edward Clarke" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 4:14 PMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: RE: [WSG] ie css

[WSG] link ?

2005-07-25 Thread csslist
ok i'm having a problem, I have a nav section on my page (see code below) that should be limited to the navwrapper div but it's not, anywhere on the page I make a link it's styled like the nav even outside the div, never had this problem before any ideas? tia #navwrapper { padding: 5px;

Re: [WSG] link ?

2005-07-25 Thread csslist
yup that was it, i completely missed that, thanks :)From: Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 11:04 PMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] link ?G'dayI'd say your problem is here: #navwrapper li a:link, a:visited {See the a:visited? That affects ALL links on the

Re: [WSG] 2 ?'s

2005-07-23 Thread csslist
quot;hunting/a/lilia href=""testimonials/a/lilia href=""bulletin board/a/li This same problem happenes if you create a display:inline li item - it renders one white space if there are any. Regards, Gary On 7/23/05, csslist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah, try it again,

RE: [WSG] Visual Studio/.net general question

2005-07-23 Thread csslist
what? thats a big load of BS! what does using coldfusion have to do with mangling your code? if you do a simple google search you will find out the what mangles code and makes it a lot more work to unmangle is .net and vs, which is what u'd expect when you let m$ write any of your

RE: [WSG] Visual Studio/.net general question

2005-07-23 Thread csslist
eveloper, their lack of knowledge and sloppy coding which makes a language produce sloppy code. Explain to me how that is wrong. W From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of csslist Sent: 23 July 2005 18:27 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Visual

[WSG] 2 ?'s

2005-07-22 Thread csslist
anyone have a good linnk to a tut or other about footers and always having them at bottom under the content. also, i have a page banner div and on safari it's moved over to the right by 1 px, any ideas on this? thanks:)

Re: [WSG] 2 ?'s

2005-07-22 Thread csslist
@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] 2 ?'sOn 7/22/05 7:10 PM "csslist" sent this out: anyone have a good linnk to a tut or other about footers and always having them at bottom under the content.This was on this list recently:--- quotingLooks like someone has found a mostly-reliable CSS-only solution tot

Re: [WSG] 2 ?'s

2005-07-22 Thread csslist
emplate="navigation.cfm" On 7/23/05, csslist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks! thats the best one i have seen so far.the only 2 i have tested so far that aren't so good is on ie mac it floats up near top and on pc opera 8 it's kinda funky. seems to have even fixed my 1 px left float

re: SPAM-LOW: RE: [WSG] base css

2005-07-11 Thread csslist
thanks :) those are good but I guess what i meant was more in terms of hacks that are generally used in most css files, I guess meaning are you guys starting off with a chunck of hacks or adding them as needed? :)From: "Mike Foskett" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 10:16 AMTo:

[WSG] base css

2005-07-04 Thread csslist
what are you guys using as a base css file to start a site with common hacks and what not? Thanks happy 4th :)

re: [WSG] design of Macromedia site

2005-02-05 Thread csslist
not sure which 1 ur talking bout but communitymx.com showed how to do it this week Recreating Macromedia's Layout Macromedia's current web site layout contains two effects that are very popular today: equal-height columns and rounded corners on columns and boxes. When these two effects are

Re: [WSG] cover me -- I'm gonna be naughty!

2005-02-04 Thread csslist
Another method would be to send lots of emails to random people YEAH!! spam them to death lol From: Andy Budd [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 4:49 AMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] cover me -- I'm gonna be naughty!Ted Drake wrote: But if we need to do it to be

re: [WSG] Kaosweaver Complete CSS Menu - accessible or not?

2005-01-30 Thread csslist
communitymx.com has a free ready to go fully compliant sites via mxp http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?cid=E1100From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 5:39 PMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: [WSG] Kaosweaver Complete CSS Menu - accessible or

re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] The Designer Is Dead, Long Live The Designer!

2005-01-29 Thread csslist
well you need too use some common sense with this of course you want a few cute graphics but if you find yourself slicing images to load faster then you are probably using to muchFrom: "Jorge Colon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 7:18 PMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject:

re: SPAM-LOW: RE: [WSG] .php extension

2005-01-25 Thread csslist
BTW surely you are not suggesting that Coldfusion is a serious competitor for PHP5? - not one for this list though? :-) a serious competitor? haha php wont catch up to coldfusions user base for a long time and that probably wont happen at all unless php takes on an underlying structure from

Re: [WSG] Question about use of flash in a pure css page

2005-01-24 Thread csslist
since you are using a server-side language you can do an "if" statement to where if it meets the flash needs it gives the flash menu if not gives an alternative menu. or if just refreshing is the problem, cache the swf immediately. ok i think i read that wrong i use coldfusion and i know what i'd

Re: [WSG] Slightly OT... Interview with IE Dev team

2005-01-05 Thread csslist
LMFAO! hahahahahahahahaha how about making it like firefox? and how about seperating it from the os for all the dumb ppl who still use it and pass on all the viruses like the previous user suggested, how about actually FOLLING the w3c and not going against it and trying to make everyone

Re: [WSG] Slightly OT... Interview with IE Dev team

2005-01-05 Thread csslist
sure but maybe they should add some Ethical responsibilty to that as well instead of trying to make this planet microsoft they can start by being honest and remove the whole os, wb interaction and maybe we could at least start to get a handle on the virus situation meanwhile billy is spend

Re: [WSG] DreamWeaver Template Left (or Right) Halo Nav in DW MX2004

2004-11-17 Thread csslist
kilogram ape looming over you. Thanks for the article link - nothing new there - but it's always good to see someone trying to tell the already converted what they want to hear. Will Jensen Moscow, Russia On Nov 17, 2004, at 10:11 AM, csslist wrote: ok maybe its just the way u said

Re: [WSG] Flash Standards Validation

2004-11-17 Thread csslist
the noraml embed tag will choke on validation as it is a depreciated tag several ppl have added the work around already what i do for flash checking is this open up flash and change the canvas size to 1 pixel by 1 pixel and in the actionscript i just add this line of code getURL (main.html)

Re: [WSG] DreamWeaver Template Left (or Right) Halo Nav in DW MX2004

2004-11-16 Thread csslist
ok maybe its just the way u said this but its gotta be the dumbest thing i have ever read [quote]I imagined MacroMedia would not turn out a template that did not work in all browsers on all platforms.[/quote] i mean come on if it makes u feel better to pass some blame then blame who it is