Have you tried making the border colour (for just that one cell) to be white,
or transparent, or whatever matches the background?
Regards,
Michael
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Grant Bailey
Sent: 30 September 2011 10:01
To:
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Thierry Koblentz
Sent: 30 October 2010 20:30
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] A simple IE and JS detection method?
snip
On the second pahe I've checked
The basic plan that I follow is to use % for structural items, which generally
need to be proportional to other structural items, and ultimately the viewport
itself.
Then, pixels purely for borders and images,
And EMs only for text.
Margins and padding can be either pixels, EMs or % depending
There is actually a fourth option, which is a pair of buttons, which is a good
idea if both choices require an action, such as feeding on to a different form,
or if this is the last action of the form.
For me, the main thing to think about is 'negative responses' - with a radio
button you get
When I look at your homepage in IE7, the first image in the sequence
loads correctly, but then the slideshow continues with images that are
less than an inch wide, at the top left of their container. Was this
what you meant about it being broken; I noticed a second email that
implied the whole
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Philippe Wittenbergh
Sent: 01 November 2009 23:05
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] [OT] Google search/index/webmaster help
Because that file is being served as
Not sure that I understand the question, but none of the CSS that you
show here applies to the code snippet that you included: they have no
classes in common.
Regards,
Mike
Mike Brockington
Web Development Specialist
www.calcResult.com
www.stephanieBlakey.me.uk
www.edinburgh.gov.uk
This
Chris,
I am not sure what system you tested this on, but it doesn't work on any
system I tried, and indeed it shouldn't: the marker is a part of the LI
not of the UL.
Regards,
Mike
Mike Brockington
Web Development Specialist
www.calcResult.com
www.stephanieBlakey.me.uk
www.edinburgh.gov.uk
One of the main points of using Unicode is that you don't need to use
entities, other than for a handful of chars used by HTML.
I always keep a good reference handy, so that I can copy and paste
straight into my files, the one I use is:
I don't really see how the ability to download fonts (that is what you are
talking about, isn't it?), will affect web accessibility significantly.
It will have a big impact on design, but the technological change surely only
affects the back-end of the web browser, not the actual display.
PS I
The link to the PDF version has an extra folder in it, that should not be
there, the actual link to the PDF is:
http://keryx.se/resources/html-elements.pdf
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Keryx Web
Marvin,
Have you been able to confirm whether this is actually a problem with
the display of your page, or a problem with the way that Jaws is
interacting with IE ?
It might be that the font _is_ Times, but Jaws is mis-leading you. Not
too sure what else you would be able to 'see', but have you
Kevin,
I think that was meant to be a hint that we might be able to debug your
code if we could see some of it - very few of us enjoy the extra
challenge of 'working blind'.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of
Judging by the lack of responses, I am probably not the only one who
didn't understand your question.
Particularly, you seem to be using the term 'image mapping' to mean
something other than using an image-map element, but I'm not aware of a
standard technique for this.
Regards,
Mike
There must be more to this than what you have said, because:
Li.item361 a span { what:ever; }
Should work okay, indeed is probably too verbose/explicit.
Mike
Mike Brockington
Web Development Specialist
www.calcResult.com
www.stephanieBlakey.me.uk
www.edinburgh.gov.uk
This message does not
Personally, I think there should have been a companion article
explaining why designers can't write code.
This is a classic example: the whole point of setting the base font size
to this value is to make the maths easier when sizing all other font
rules; but that itself exposes the fact that the
Tee,
My original comment was meant to be taken light-heartedly, but was also
taken in direct response to the article quoted by CK:
Why Programmers Suck at CSS Design
http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/169/
Your comment itself seems to be contradicting itself:
If developers _are_
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media]
aboeh...@addictivemedia.com.au wrote:
I went through WCAG 1 and WCAG 2, and I expected an appropriate
guideline to
show up under Priority 1 (or Level A), but nothing. Or am I
missing
something in the obscure
For the record, the problem that I was having seems to be limited to one
installation - everyone else who has tested this has had no issues, so I
am going to assume that there _isn't_ anything wrong with my code until
proved otherwise.
Mike
-Original Message-
From:
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org on behalf of Gunlaug Sørtun
Sent: Thu 4/2/2009 6:15 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] IE7 CSS fix
It's far more reliable than CSS hacks, which may cause problems in
future browsers.
I don't agree with that
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Chris F.A. Johnson
Sent: 25 March 2009 18:03
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] IE8 compatibility mode
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Gunlaug S?rtun wrote:
The start html tag is
Hi,
One of the very first pages that I tested in the released version of IE8
was:
http://www.calcresult.com/reference/text/unicode-reference.html
The rendering of that page is slightly broken (at the moment) in IE6 and
IE7 in that the right-hand column overlaps some of the content. What
confused
The only difference that you are likely to see is going to be due to a
different set of default fonts - iirc a few more were introduced with
Vista.
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Peter Mount
Sent: 15
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Kay in t Veen - Gmail
Sent: 13 March 2009 10:59
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Illinois Functional Web Accessibility Evaluator 1.0
Released!
double h1 tags are never
I believe a best practice is for your web pages to use the same TARGET
attribute value so links from your page basically are updating the
same
new window and not creating a new window for every link followed
from your website.
Jon
I would have to disagree with that. If the user actually
David,
I think you are reading things differently to me. I don't know the
authors true intention, but I read his words as being a call for anyone
who wants to see ARIA implemented to join their team, not necessarily
someone who is on the ARIA team.
I do also agree with the sentiments though -
Sounds like a case for a virtual machine, both the Microsoft and VMWare
products are free.
Mike
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Brett Patterson
Sent: 26 February 2009 15:21
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
In my own personal opinion, if you get into the situation where you want
to use a selector like:
.class1.class2 { stuff }
then it is time to do a little re-factoring. The whole point of allowing
an element to have two or more classes is so that each class remains
semantically logical. As you
That's part of why I posed it as a question, not as a statement.
Though, from what I recall, part of the problem was that the mechanism
of a DTD was not capable of making such a requirement, and the DTD was
regarded as more definitive than the written spec.
Mike
-Original Message-
Not to mention optimum line lengths, amount of whitespace, justification
...
It is unfortunately far too common to assume that lessons learned
centuries ago are no longer relevant, just because they weren't digital.
Actually, that was one of the big changes then: type was inherently
fixed-width,
There were a couple of articles on SitePoint (if I recall correctly) six
months ago or so, that covered this, in a fairly positive light.
I'm afraid I'm not in a position to chase after them right now; perhaps
someone else does have the time?
Mike
Marvin,
It is a little hard for us to help you when you do not include the
offending source code.
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Marvin Hunkin
Sent: 12 January 2009 01:37
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Quote: The fact is that many educators have found that they can use
Flash to teach their students effectively.
I think you (and those teachers that you refer to) are mistaking an
effective lesson, for effective teaching.*
Also, I think you mis-understand where the problem lies. Because of the
To my eyes, the reason is that the font itself is larger on the right
hand side. Naturally this will give a larger line-height, unless you
have specified otherwise.
Regards,
Mike
Mike Brockington
Web Development Specialist
www.calcResult.com
www.stephanieBlakey.me.uk
www.edinburgh.gov.uk
This
I think you may have missed the point of the earlier question - What can
flash bring to the learning environment that cannot be done with HTML,
CSS and JavaScript?
Regards,
Mike
PS: Please print and keep this email, as all paper these days comes from
managed forests, and therefore more trees
Any script that relies on an array being ordered, without actually doing
a sort() is seriously deficient. As you mentioned yourself, this
behaviour is entirely in agreement with the JS spec.
Regards,
Mike
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org
Do the additional wrapper divs make as much difference to the page
weight as the images that you imply are also required? Eleven extra
bytes is generally nothing compared to an additional image. Unless you
are adding them in four-figure quantities, no amount of DIVs are likely
to cause a problem
I suspect that the OP miss-stated the problem. From my understanding, he wants
the BGcolor to extend for _only_ the width of the TEXT, not for the entire
width of the element.
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Stuart Foulstone
Sent: Tue 12/2/2008
I am hoping that the live testing/trial that will
be carried out early next year just shows that this
is technically unfeasible. It is quite stupid to be
filtering the internet for everyone in Australia,
when it is much simpler to be done on each individual
PC through the use of software
Now I am even more confused!
I was always under the impression that HTML4 and lower were valid SGML.
That XHTML1 and up were valid XML
That XML was valid SGML
So how the ??? does that leave us with either 'serialisation' of the new
language being in-compatible with SGML?
Regards,
Mike
The HTML working group is working on HTML5 which will have two
serialisations.
A tag soup (and emphatically not SGML) serialisation
and an XML serialisation (which they are referring to as XHTML5).
Why do you say that HTML5 will not be valid SGML?
Mike
If I remember rightly if you are able to save the image with a
transparent background it keeps the file size lower because a
transparent pixel takes less space than a pixel with colour
information.
It may be possible to get better compression on a file that contains
lots of pixels of the
Not sure if it would help in this instance, but what about splitting
this into two files: load a transparent-background logo to quickly load
in front, with the ripples as a background? You may then be able to tile
the background to save a little.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Unless it is a new extension that I have never heard of, there is no
such thing as 'rollover' in JavaScript.
/correct-pedant
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Joe Ortenzi
Sent: 08 November 2008 03:53
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
That would (probably) be part of the wonders of 'Threaded' view in
Outlook: the 'Thread Closed' message is always filed in a different
place from the thread that you are reading!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rimantas Liubertas
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Brett Patterson
Sent: 28 October 2008 12:35
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please
When you say support, are you saying that Internet Explorer will not
execute
JavaScript, or it will
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Brett Patterson
Sent: 24 October 2008 02:25
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please
Oh, most definitely agreed. Sorry if I started an argument, I only
wanted to know
what it was. I
Does anyone think that WCAG 2.0 will improve the user experience?
Or do you take my view that it only benefits developers,
and that the user experience will be worse in future?
_Personally_ I think that it is basically a retrograde step. Version
one was too complex for most people to fully
Really?
I'll give you ten to one that the majority of PC users have no idea what
that key does.
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of ? ???
Sent: 29 September 2008 10:16
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re:
That is a different story though: we are not talking about _replacing_
the home key with a link, we are talking about implementing additional
affordance - if the user does not recognise it, or prefers to do things
differently, then nothing is lost.
Whether the additional noise on the page is a
I think that is going to depend a lot on what you are trying to do with
your JS knowledge: are we talking about animation, AJAX or something
entirely different?
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Simon
Sent: 18 September 2008
It really feels as if we need a standards process that is much more
agile and
iterative. Something that is much less monolithic. If WHATWG and the
W3C
are unable to do this, the browser vendors -- and the market -- will.
-jeff
I'm not sure if I said it here before or not, but I
I would also like to point out that Facebook have a different business
model from the majority of web sites - they have little to loose by
excluding IE6 - they are not a shop, they are not trying to break into
an existing market, they have a greater bias towards the home user than
the corporate,
Many people have some sort of reset stylesheet, that turns on a border
for every div or every element. The 'perfect' version of this idea can
get very complex, but something as simple as setting a border on all
divs can often show you where something is stretching or floating where
you were not
I think you will find that this has no direct effect on accessibility.
As I am sure you know, if you rely on these methods for navigation, or
if that select isn't made keyboard-friendly, then that is a problem, but
inline JavaScript on its own is fine. In some circumstances it is better
to have it
This is how I work, but mainly for pragmatic reasons:
Better JavaScript de-bugging tools in FireFox.
Better CSS support, therefore fewer problems out of the box, and better
stylesheet analysis tools.
Finally, the one good reason: anything that needs to be fixed for IE can
be done with conditional
Besides, images maps are a royal pain to maintain.
-Tim
Not as much of a pain as some of the faux-image-maps that I have seen
done with 'pure css' or even css + JavaScript. There are tools out there
that make true image-maps point-and-click simple, whereas a small change
to some of the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Sam Sherlock
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 2:17 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] H1 and the img tag
ok - seo is a bit like voodoo to me
the following sites seem to be contray to suggestion
An individual who brings a case under the DDA can seek
monetary compensation. However, the law is supposed to be a
last resort, and users are expected to give the website owner
the opportunity to make the website accessible before
resorting to law. Failure to do so suggests that the plaintiff
On a more positive note - you could point out that having an embedded
player would allow the band to offer the user a choice of music, which
would be a better option than alienating many users. (Offering a client
a 'better option' usually goes down a lot better than 'don't do that!')
From an
Calm down everyone!
In this case, though no doubt someone can find a dictionary that
disagrees with me, a list could usually be said to be synonymous with a
'single column table' and conversely, a data table is a set of parallel
lists - they are both special cases of each other.
On that basis, I
To my mind, one of the most pressing questions that needs to be answered
in any particular case is: How is the fieldset labelled?
If it specifically says something like 'postcode' or maybe 'contact
details', and is one of a collection of fieldsets, then the button
should probably be outside.
If
Not wanting to hijack the PNG thread, so I've altered the subject.
I understand the issues involve in huge migrations, it's not
that easy..
At the risk of starting a war, it doesn't sound like you do understand.
Before even starting to plan a migration, any decent corporation, of
whatever
Sorry folks, but am I missing something here?
Why do you think that it is important to stuff something invisible
inside an (otherwise) empty div?
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Hucklesby
Sent: Thursday, July 17,
Not the clearing div, I know what that is for!!
What is the _content_ of the div supposed to do, that an truly empty div
would not?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kevin mcmonagle
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 10:33 AM
To:
I have a similar issue with www.calcResult.com: everything is done with
JavaScript, but what I do is make all forms link to a page explaining
that the site requires JavaScript, and why. Sometimes I see that page
when a script I am working on fails, but even that is arguably better
than nothing
I may be wrong, but your use of cite looks the wrong way around -
surely a citation should point at a document?
Mike
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens-Uwe Korff
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:52 AM
To:
At the end of the day, this whole question is a no-brainer:
On the one hand you can annoy [a few .. most] people by forcing them to
scroll horizontally,
Or you can keep everyone happy by not allowing a horizontal scroll bar.
Whether it is a major issue or a trivial issue is irrelevant as there is
Yes, a similar criticism has been levelled at Elastic layouts
-- that when you enlarge the text the layout grows with it,
I think you meant to say MAY grow - a carefully designed elastic layout
will not expand the viewport horizontally.
Mike
Mike Brockington
Web Development Specialist
Does anyone have an example of this behaviour? Not quite sure I follow
the issue...
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken McInnes
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:55 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Firefox 3
Rubbish.
I have plenty of experience of commercial-grade spam filters, and when
95% of received mail is spam, you don't have a hope of getting it all,
unless you want to block a significant portion of legitimate mail as
well.
Mike
From: [EMAIL
Michael,
In many ways we are the lucky ones - if you are doing SQL server day to
day, or pretty much anything other than HTML then there are no standards
at all - just 'on time/budget' or 'not/fired'.
Stuff like SOX has given some impetus to doing things 'the right way'
instead of the quick way,
So does everyone agree that the form is the best option for entire
cross - situation compatibility?
James
I think that is really an individual decision - a simple contact form on
its own has a number of usability issues, which are well documented
elsewhere. For the user there is the lack of
What kind of students will the course be aimed at?
Arts graduates? Scientists?
Mike
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Grant
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:31 PM
To: wsg
Subject: [WSG]
My take on this, is that IT ALL DEPENDS !
Every site is different.
For example: www.calcresult.com does not use a traditional image-based
logo, so the arguments that the site logo is 'just a simple image' fails
completely.
Some sites look a bit like a newspaper. Newspapers themselves vary
If you want to look at things from that angle, then we have to make a
split between what the user wants - news, information, entertainment,
etc.
what the commissioner wants,
and what the search engines want.
All sites on the web arguable fall into one of three categories:
Hobby sites,
Businesses,
But does two H1's in a row really agree with the spec? My understanding
was that a sub-level could repeat immediately, but H1's were not
supposed to.
For example:
Okay:
H1
H2
H2
H3
H1
H2
Bad:
H1
H1
Regards,
Mike
That's a good point and it may explain the ALA's approach:
h1The
Thierry,
I think your misunderstanding lies earlier than my last post.
If someone wishes to use an abbr tag in the way that it was intended
by the spec, then that is perfectly acceptable, obviously. If their
scripting then fails in IE they have three clear choices - write a more
robust script,
No, its not. In this case, if any single browser breaks a related
script, then the mark-up cannot be used - working on the majority is
not enough to make it viable.
Does that mean we should drop the ABBR element because IE
can't handle it properly?
In what way is that the same as the
It MIGHT be possible to use CSS alone to show/hide the text field depending on
the last option being clicked, but it would need a lot of testing.
It would certainly be far easier to do this in JS, and as this is only an
enhancement, not required functionality, I don't see an issue with doing
Judging by how quickly you replied, I am doubtful that you managed to
test every browser version known to mankind before you replied - one
or two combinations doesn't really make effective proof!
In any case, is this just a case of the browser inserting what it thinks
should be there, as with
My advice would be to try as hard as you can NOT to sell accessibility.
Sell your overall services, but mention that your competitors 'tend' to
leave their customers vulnerable to law suits, exclude customers for no
good reason, etc. Tell your clients that your competitors are literally
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hassan Schroeder
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 2:27 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Fwd: using fieldsets and legends (outside a
form) for adding structural mark-up
Au contraire, one is
I'm guessing you don't actually administer a corporate size
spam-filtering 'solution' do you?
(The word solution should really be in quadruple quotes, 'cos it ain't
one.)
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick H. Lauke
Sent:
Have to disagree with you there - just because some people do it for a
good reason doesn't mean that the illiterate aren't.
Certain people that I know, type the full, exact URL for a site into the
Google search box in the middle of the page, wait for the results to
load, then click the first link
Maybe for you, but for many of us, a carefully edited reply makes
perfect sense. Failing to ever truncate a conversation may be wasteful,
but even then, by top-posting you allow people to easily check previous
messages that have since been deleted. The message that you are quoting
was neither
And if JavaScript is turned off?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Persson
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 7:37 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] valid video in (x)html?
My experience tells that Videos and
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Jeffery
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 10:23 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] IE8 beta's a nightmare
snip
What developer on this planet is going to take advantage of a
feature thats been put
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Harris
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 10:48 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] IE8 beta's a nightmare
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would be pragmatic Intranet developers, who know
If I may be permitted to be pedantic for a moment, I believe that
JavaScript may be used to provide Assistance with Validation (So you
are both correct...)
Security can only ever be _reliably_ provided on the server side, but
validation of user input is perfectly acceptable as client side code,
In a word, Yes.
Some people will try and drag the 'thumb' of the bar, which as I
mentioned last time may not be possible at all.
Others will just try and use the up and down arrows, which could be
painful for a long list, especially if the calibration of the
touchscreen is at all problematic
Please help me with another question, with multiple list menu,
we use 'ctrl' and 'Ctrl + shift' to select multiple options,
how does this work with touch screen?
tee
Unless you have a keyboard, it probably doesn't work. Some touchscreens
(try) to let you do dragging and stuff, but I think
Tee,
It sounds like you are having a bit of difficulty with the
'Accessibility' label here: Accessibility is just one branch of
Usability, neither of which ever go away completely.
I used to do quite a lot of touch-screen kiosk development, but I know
that things have moved on a little since
2) Is there anything I can use to replace the checkbox for
the Kiosk?
It needs to be large but from my testing, I can't make it
larger by adding paddings, width and height. Not to mention
this won't work with Safari and Camino (they have another web
version for the same section )
Have you
Do I understand this right: you want the background to change, as the mouse
passes over one of these diagonal lines - or just when the user mouses over any
part of the background?
Mike
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stuart Foulstone
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 9:40 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] How to make diagonal lines change colour?
Hi,
From a usability and accessibility point of view doing
That sounds very complex to achieve, if it is possible:
As things stand, the lines you are talking about don't actually exist, they are
an artefact of the tiled bb image you are using (nb, the effect was too subtle
for me to see on the first machine I viewed your site on) - to do what you
Don't mean to be negative, but NVU is a pretty poor choice: even its own
home page admits that!
(Last release was 2005, and that should never have been classed as
version 1, and no development work being undertaken.)
As far as I can see, the best choice on the open source route is
SeaMonkey.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
one thing I
miss about dreamweaver is that you can do a 'search all' and
get a list of all instances of the thing you are searching for
rather than cycling through a 'find...find...find...'
list. So far it's the only program I've used that
This has been possible on every Apple Mac for the last fifteen years or
so, and you have the option of changing the voice if you want,
unfortunately the good versions that are available for Windows are all
relatively expensive.
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
Someone's asked me about
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
