with an idea would be very helpful.
Thanks all.
Jason C
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Help with IE giving me a big white space - FIXED
Sent: 16 Sep '05 06:24
never mind, my brain finally kicked in - fixed now
Cheers
Hello
Any help would be appreciated
http://learnline.cdu.edu.au/wip/hit111/ renders fine in Firefox
Has a big white block under my utilities at the top in IE6
Please help as I just can't figure this out.
Thank you :)
Helen
***
Helen Rysavy
Web
Hi everyone
After the excellent help I received a few days ago, I have continued my
development which can be viewed here:
http://www.metamorphosis.info/test/index2.htm
The CSS file is located at:
http://www.metamorphosis.info/test/s/css2.css
Al was just fine, until I noticed that the
Hi,
Extremely helpful; I owe you a pint :)
C
On Aug 20, 2005, at 1:39 AM, Edward Clarke wrote:
There are some interesting articles on default stylesheets.
http://www.robertnyman.com/2005/07/15/the-most-important-css-rule/
On 20 Aug 2005, at 8:39 PM, Edward Clarke wrote:
Global selectors may offer performance disadvantages
There is no evidence to support this... it is a factoid.
kind regards
Terrence Wood.
**
The discussion list for
Hi all,
I am new to the list, and this is my first posting so please be gentle
;-)
I have a task I am trying to accomplish which is not going to plan.
The base code for what I want to achieve can be found at: http://www.metamorphosis.info/test/index-test.htm
My aim is to
place a single blue
Hi man
Just try to write
height: 100%;
on the BODY on the css file and you're done. At least it work for me.
Christian Robertson wrote:
Hi all,
I am new to the list, and this is my first posting so please be gentle ;-)
I have a task I am trying to accomplish which is not going to plan.
One step further, just add this:
html, body{
height:100%;
}
Remember that HTMLand BODY are valid elements that wrap all of your
content. To varying extents they can be styled like any other element
on your page. In firefox, HTML and BODY inherit their height and
width from the browser window
Hi,
Should this rule:
html, body{
height:100%;
}
be a default on each page, like
* {
margin:0;
padding: 0;
}
Has become on my core style sheet?
On Aug 19, 2005, at 10:14 AM, Patrick Ryan wrote:
One step further, just add this:
html, body{
height:100%;
}
Remember that
Hi Partic /
Alejandro,
Works perfectly. Many thanks!
Chris
Patrick Ryan wrote:
One step further, just add this:
html, body{
height:100%;
}
Remember that HTMLand BODY are valid elements that wrap all of your
content. To varying extents they can be styled like any other element
on your
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:14:46 -0700, Chris Kennon wrote:
Should this rule:
html, body{
height:100%;
}
be a default on each page, like
* {
margin:0;
padding: 0;
}
What a great Friday afternoon question!
I haven't yet had to use that on my pages and I, too, am interested in
Hi,
I meant on a core style-sheet, and what does bump mean?
C
On Aug 19, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Lea de Groot wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:14:46 -0700, Chris Kennon wrote:
Should this rule:
html, body{
height:100%;
}
be a default on each page, like
* {
margin:0;
padding: 0;
}
Chris Kennon wrote:
Should this rule:
html, body{ height:100%; }
be a default on each page, like
* { margin:0; padding: 0; }
Lea de Groot wrote:
What a great Friday afternoon question!
I haven't yet had to use that on my pages and I, too, am
interested in people's opinion. (In other
From: Chris Kennon
I meant on a core style-sheet, and what does bump mean?
Lea de Groot wrote:
(In other words 'bump' ;))
Bumping the topic back to the top, used more in web forums that email lists.
--
Peter Williams
winmail.dat
Don't forget to change the spelling of Cross cutltural awareness
Craig Rippon
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 17 August 2005 10:50 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Help with navigation
Hi
Hi
The subnav in my site:
http://learnline.cdu.edu.au/wip/tog/background/introduction.html
should look like this:
http://learnline.cdu.edu.au/wip/tog/navtest.html.
but I cannot get it to work.. :( - and I can't figure out why.. :(
Any help is much appreciated.
Thanks
Helen
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The subnav in my site:
http://learnline.cdu.edu.au/wip/tog/background/introduction.html
should look like this:
http://learnline.cdu.edu.au/wip/tog/navtest.html.
but I cannot get it to work.
Helen,
It is working nicely for me in IE6/Win and FF1.06/Win.
What
From a quick look, it appears the class name differs between the two pages
From navigation page
a href=introduction.html class=currenttopicIntroduction/a
From page
a href=introduction.html class=topicIntroduction/a
Nick
This email is from the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection
:
Sent by: Subject: RE: [WSG] Help with
navigation
[EMAIL PROTECTED
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't see the currenttopic i.e. introduction being highlighted..
Ahhh,
Now I see what you mean.
You're missing the class=currenttopic from the item
you want highlighted as the current position.
Your example page has:
lia href=introduction.html
On 17 Aug 2005, at 1:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't see the currenttopic i.e. introduction being highlighted..
remove :link or adding :link:visited from the following declaration:
#navCircle a.currenttopic:link
becuause when it is the current page it becomes a visited page.
kind
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [WSG] Help with
navigation
dsgroup.org
On 17 Aug 2005, at 1:36 PM, Terrence Wood wrote:
remove :link or adding :link:visited from the following declaration:
oops, I mean replace it with :visited
T.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
I think this might be off topic, so please reply to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am trying to get a simple colour switcher
happening and having no luck. Can someone please help me get mine fixed or
help with another simple one? Thank you.
My main style sheet (ifsmain.css) is in a positive image. My
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Sorry for the blank message. Used the wrong keys.
I think this might be off topic, so please reply to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am trying to get a simple colour switcher
happening and having no luck. Can someone please help me get mine fixed or
help with another simple one? Thank you.
My main style
It's on-topic as a js question.
No guarantees but I think you need to link to both stylesheets in the
document head and give them the titles you use in your javascript. And
finally turn off the alternate stylesheet.
so the code should look something like:
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css
I think this might be off topic, so please reply to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am trying to get a simple colour switcher
happening and having no luck. Can someone please help me get mine fixed or
help with another simple one? Thank you.
My main style sheet (ifsmain.css) is in a positive image. My
: russ - maxdesign <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:06:18 +1000 To: Web Standards Group <WSG@WEBSTANDARDSGROUP.ORG> Subject: Re: [WSG] help or web - THREAD CLOSED Maybe enough said on this THREAD CLOSED There has been a lot of good in
@webstandardsgroup.org
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:06:18 +1000
To: Web Standards Group wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] help or web - THREAD CLOSED
Maybe enough said on this
THREAD CLOSED
There has been a lot of good input here, so thanks for bringing it up and
for the following
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:14:13 -0700, tee wrote:
Forgive me Russ, while I was writing this email, your THREAD CLOSED
came in but I have an urge to finish my message.
Hello Tee,
Thank you for your heart-felt message to the group.
I'm so glad you squeezed it in. It reflects my sentiments, too.
is this mailing list for anything
other than helping novice designers with their hacks?
Mike
Whitehurstwww.mike-whitehurst.co.uk
Mike Whitehurst wrote:
is this mailing list for anything other than helping novice designers
with their hacks?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is a pretty much catch-all for
web/html/php/sql/asp/apache.javascript/flash help. sign up.
http://www.evolt.org
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:30:24 +0100, Mike Whitehurst wrote:
is this mailing list for anything other than helping novice designers
with their hacks?
This is definitely a mailing list for discussing all aspects of web
standards.
Any technical list is going to have a large proportion of 'newbie'
to the fine efforts of
the moderators and members themselves).
Perhaps it's time to evolve the list?
Just a thought :o)
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 7:07 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] help or web
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:26:22 +1000, Richard Czeiger wrote:
Perhaps there should be two lists - one for discussing
standards/accessibility/best practice and one for how do I fix my
float/site check please.
I like the concept, but my experience of multiple lists for the one
group is that
Lea de Groot wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:26:22 +1000, Richard Czeiger wrote:
Perhaps there should be two lists - one for discussing
standards/accessibility/best practice and one for how do I fix my
float/site check please.
Having multiple lists also starts lots of flame threads on
I totally concur with Lea (which happens with amazing regularity).
We have discussed this matter in the past (along with creating online fora
to move some of the newbie stuff off the list) but the general consensus was
that this was and still is the best way to do it to cover all levels.
If
It's a huge Help when the Subject line clearly defines the topic, that
way you can quickly identify threads where you may want to participate.
It also helps when browsing archives. Russ has covered this in the
intro, and most lists do, but people still persist with Help Needed
and equivalent
Jason Foss wrote:
If I can chip in too - I don't have a problem with newbie posts, nor
more advanced posts. But I don't even open Help Needed type subject
lines. A descriptive subject line is all that's needed; you can
quickly decide if you want to read or get involved in the thread.
My 2c,
On 7/11/05 4:51 PM Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
I think the flip side is that a) newbies need to see the 'advanced'
stuff to learn by osmosis and b) its really good for gurus to see the
newbie questions (and maybe occasionally answer them? Hint, hint
people ;)) to keep them
But I don't even open Help Needed type subject
lines.
And I never read HTML/RTF email either. Text is too small.
Rick
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 12:02 +1000, Jason Foss wrote:
But I don't even open Help Needed type subject
lines. A descriptive subject line is all that's needed; you can
quickly decide if you want to read or get involved in the thread.
There's a minor problem with this, though I agree with your core
Joshua Street wrote:
There's a minor problem with this, though I agree with your core
argument. Newbie posts requesting site reviews can't very easily bear
a descriptive subject line when all they want is advice on
semantics/markup and best practises. There isn't a core problem they
want
Maybe enough said on this
THREAD CLOSED
There has been a lot of good input here, so thanks for bringing it up and
for the following discussion... I think we can wrap it up now.
A few points to recap:
1. At this stage we will not be going to two or more lists.
2. Please use a subject line
Please don't forget, while forking, to build a third mediocres/average
list, for those who squint at being a guru and tend to forget the years
they were soo newbie.
or, alternatively:
Raise the level of the input in this list by more quality postings and
answers.
The quality of the
I know so many people have asked for this and at one point i left the
emails on the topic in my inbox but then i deleted them. I need to know
how to switch from tables to divs. I have a 2 column table and want to
switch it into css using divs. I know it has to do with the float tag
in css but i
Hi,
deconstruct and redo:
http://www.456bereastreet.com/lab/developing_with_web_standards/
csslayout/2-col/
G/L
C
On May 31, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
I know so many people have asked for this and at one point i left
the emails on the topic in my inbox but then i
We have had a number of requests for a linux version of the colour contrast
analyser [CCA], a freeware
tool,(http://www.nils.org.au/ais/web/resources/contrast_analyser/index.html),
but do not have the skills to do this ourselves, is anybody who does have
the skills ,or knows someone,
Hello all,
I've been developing a site based on the Ruthsarian layouts and it's
working ok except in IE 6.0, where there's a problem which is leaving me
baffled, so I'm hoping that someone will be able to help.
The site is http://www.ely.anglican.org/parishes/camgsm/new_site/index.html
The css
-Original Message-
From: Rachel Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 25 April 2005 7:50 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] help, please!!
Hello all,
I've been developing a site based on the Ruthsarian layouts and it's
working ok except in IE 6.0
Rachel Campbell wrote:
I've been developing a site based on the Ruthsarian layouts and it's
working ok except in IE 6.0, where there's a problem which is leaving me
baffled, so I'm hoping that someone will be able to help.
...
There isn't a problem if you set IE's options to refresh on every
Rachel Campbell schrieb:
The problem is that the header doesn't always display at all on some
pages, such as
http://www.ely.anglican.org/parishes/camgsm/new_site/activities/music/index.html.
There isn't a problem if you set IE's options to refresh on every visit
to the page, but that's not
Can anyone out there help with some style
sheet woes? Im relatively new to css and Im trying to refit
our site to accessibility standards. The project is well under wayand
well behind schedule. Im trying to launch by the end of the
month. My current problem is getting the footer div to
Hi everyone,
I got this cool roundbox code from http://www.redmelon.net/tstme/4corners
and am trying to adapt it for use in a more complex wrapper with a masthead,
body and footer...But im havin a proble with one of the side drop shadows.
check out the page at
Hi Tee,
I saw the imageless example to, but it dosn't work in ie5 mac.
Even though some people don't develop for this browser anymore i still use
it somethimes.
Also the roundbox im working on has a drop shadow on either side.
thank you
-Kevin
Hi Kevin, I found this nifty corners the other
and am trying to adapt it for use in a more complex wrapper with a masthead
I know I'm not answering directly to your problem, but take a look at
ALA: Mountaintop Corners
http://alistapart.com/articles/mountaintop/
ALA: CSS Design: Creating Custom Corners Borders
I can't see what you mean.
But what I do is, give the container a height of 1%.
eg:
div { height: 1% }
and that DIV will no longer be effected.
I cant tell if thats the problem though.
Gallagher, Robin wrote:
Hi
As you can see on the test page I've put up here:
This fixed it:
#rightColumn
{
float: right;
width: 200px;
background-image: url(background.jpg);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: 500px;
}
* html #rightColumn
{
width: 202px;
margin-left: -2px;
}
* html hid the IE fix from other
Hi
As you can see on the test page I've put up here:
http://home.vicnet.net.au/~persia/final/test.html
The background image in the floated right column is being affected by the IE
3-pixel bug.
I've found an explanation and solution for this at:
Gallagher, Robin wrote:
http://home.vicnet.net.au/~persia/final/test.html
The background image in the floated right column is being affected by the IE 3-pixel bug.
I would go for the simplest solution:
#rightColumn {_width:202px;_margin-left: -2px;}
...that'll fix IE6.
Then I would try a proper
Hello,
I'm trying to create a modified version of the ThrashBox (original
ThrashBox is at: http://www.vertexwerks.com/tests/sidebox/).
My modification is at:
http://www.love2tap.com/test/
Basically, I'm trying to add an image to the header area that can
easily be replaced allowing the box to be
Ah, OK, it's not perfectly centered. I didn't notice at first.
You have put MSIE into quirks mode by adding the xml prolog at
the top of the source. ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
MSIE thus uses the old box model, making the paragraphs narrower.
Since you're floating them to the left,
Hi Bert
Thanks for your suggestion.
I tested that by removing all the floats, positioning and
display:inline (with the web developer toolbar in Firefox) and it
made no visible difference to the layout.
I have included these elements for a couple of other pages, namely:
Thanks Bert
In quirks mode, that means the footer is only a total of 698px
wide (with the padding subtracted to get inside width).
In standards mode (as with Firefox and Opera), left and right
padding is added to that figure, for a total width of 728px.
I have removed the left and right
On Sat February 12 2005 12:53, ::dotcompals:: wrote:
img src='http://127.0.0.1:1030/bug.cgi'
Well my dear boy. In order to fix this bug you will need to upload the
image to the Geocities server. In your account directory and change the src
part of the image so that it points to the uploaded
Hi All
I've been pounding my head against the desk for a while trying to figure
out why I'm getting a space between my h1 tag and the topnav. It looks
fine in firefox, naturally, but in IE, there is about a 10px margin
between the h1 and ul#topnav. This is visible by the jog in the blue
bar as
Dear friends,
Can any one help me with the extension used these days in
some we pages. For example .gne (flickr.com) .pyra .do
(blogger.com). How can these extensions be created what
are its advantages?
regards
=
Prashanth Nair
dotcompals
Tattamangalam.P.O
Palakkad Dt. Kerala (State)
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 05:06:15 -0800 (PST), dotcompals
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear friends,
Can any one help me with the extension used these days in
some we pages. For example .gne (flickr.com) .pyra .do
(blogger.com). How can these extensions be created what
are its advantages?
dotcompals wrote:
Dear friends,
Can any one help me with the extension used these days in
some we pages. For example .gne (flickr.com) .pyra .do
(blogger.com). How can these extensions be created what
are its advantages?
regards
Its a server side thing. There are no advantages for the
Hi,
I think the only advantages of these extensions are dis-advantages.
The must-read on this topic is from Tim Berners-Lee Cool URIs don't
change:
http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html
If you must use any extension at all - please consider something that
anyone finds meaningful. The
BB does XHTML, PHP, CSS etc.. built in FTP, HTML Tidy, FTP etc... You name
it, it's got it.
I use one called Editpad Pro. It has downloadable syntax for a number
of different languages, a dictionary, tabs which allow you to work on
multiple items at once, a project feature that allows to save
@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Help - newbie text editors
BB does XHTML, PHP, CSS etc.. built in FTP, HTML Tidy, FTP etc... You
name
it, it's got it.
I use one called Editpad Pro. It has downloadable syntax for a number
of different languages, a dictionary, tabs which allow you to work
Glad to help!
It honestly is the best ever coder I have used.
It is true that for Server Side Scripting - it isn't as helpful as it is
for HTML.
But is is really advanced in that, when you have a document - for
example a PHP document, like below:
?
php php php
php php php
php php php
php
I haven't even heard of TSW coder before - but it looks pretty good.
The built-in code validators look really handy - especially for
bug-hunting.
Thanks for the link!
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:35:31 +1100, Chris Stratford
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glad to help!
It honestly is the best ever
No Problemo Jason!
The code validator is odd, when you click on a HTML element in the
source, it will show up in the status bar if its valid etc as well.
I havn't really used the validators much, but i know they are there
because before I wrote up teh little snippet, i was looking through the
Actually that's nothing new. Many of the better editors will do that.
The reasons I switched were 1) I was using PHP and so many of the nice
things like the built in HTML/CSS Validator. 2) Besides syntax
highlighting, it doesn't really support PHP (as in being able to parse
it on the fly)
Sorry going to have to stop you there again...
Alan Trick wrote:
1) I was using PHP and so many of the nice things like the built in
HTML/CSS Validator.
I dont get what that means...???
Maybe you mean its redundant?
Maybe so, but its a feature never the less...
2) Besides syntax highlighting,
Even Dreamweaver's code editing mode does this (context-sensitive syntax
highlighting). There's been a good deal of derogatory commentary about
Dreamweaver recently, but as a web IDE I think it's fantastic. Where people
get into trouble is by relying solely on WYSIWYG mode. I rarely use WYSIWYG
Hi all,
First of all, It¹s always you writing the code, not the program ;-)
Anyway on the Macintosh these editors rock:
BBEdit: see http://www.barebones.com/index.shtml
Not cheap, but worth every penny IMHO, Textwrangler is now a free download
as an alternative.
BB does XHTML, PHP, CSS etc..
Title: Message
I have been writing
html code for awhile now and and starting to realize how inaccessible and
non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand written code in Edit Plus 2,
is there a better editor I can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? )
and where should I
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:05:03 -0330, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize
how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand
written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web
standards (
standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? )
Eh, I won't suggest it to beginner - skilled coder knows all the
gotchas, but beginner may just stuck with the WYSIWYG and do it badly.
Everebody in our workshop works with PSPad on almost everything.
If you want to try WYSIWYG I'd suggest trying NVU...
and
Hi,
Here's a bit of what I've learned jumping from editor to editor.
1) Don't pay for and editor, unless your filthy rich or can freeload one
off a company you work for. There are free alternatives that are at
least as good as the one's you pay for.
2) WYSIWYG (point and click) is pure evil.
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize
how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand
written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web
standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:05:03 -0330, Paul wrote:
is there a better editor I can use for web
standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for tips on
accessibility and standards compliance.
Rather than changing editors, or at least, rather than going to DW! :),
I'd suggest you
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Cummiskey
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 11:12 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Help - newbie
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to
realize
how inaccessible
True, provided your editor isn't WYSIWYG.
Brian Cummiskey wrote:
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to
realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have
always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I
can use for web
Wow,wow,wow slow down Alan,
...
Alan Trick wrote:
1) TSW Webcoder: Not bad for newbies. It requires regristration to
get rid of the popup things which is anoying. It is basically for
HTML/CSS coding only. It has no support for server-side scripting
like PHP or ASP besides serverside
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize
how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand
written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web
standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to
realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have
always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I
can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I
start for
I have always recommended not using an editor, learn it manually, then
perhaps use one for shortcuts. Reliance on html editors and such isn't a
good idea. That will go a long way toward learning on your own, without
being limited by some software. Notetab or notepad is fine.
Bruce Prochnau
On 1/19/05 3:55 PM, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have always recommended not using an editor, learn it manually, then
perhaps use one for shortcuts. Reliance on html editors and such isn't a
good idea. That will go a long way toward learning on your own, without
being limited by some
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:41:40 +1000, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rather than changing editors, or at least, rather than going to DW! :),
I'd suggest you just start validating your pages.
Figuring out those fixes will teach you a lot, and from there you can
move on to Accessibility
Chris Stratford wrote:
Wow,wow,wow slow down Alan,
... snip
I LOVE TSW WebCoder.
Built in FTP is Excellent!
Built in Project Manager - with Status reports, To Do Lists, Full
Project Upload
Built in Server Mapping.
Preview in IE and Mozilla - only for HTML coding, or if your server
mapping...
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to
realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have
always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I
can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I
start for
Hello,
I have a little problem with a border with a site I'm doing. The
prototype's URL is http://www.raquedan.com/quickinfo.
My 3-column lay-out has a bit of a snag. The left-most sub-column has
a border that doesn't stretch all the way down to the length of the
longest column (the center
Regnard Kreisler C. Raquedan wrote:
Hello,
I have a little problem with a border with a site I'm doing. The
prototype's URL is http://www.raquedan.com/quickinfo.
My 3-column lay-out has a bit of a snag. The left-most sub-column has
a border that doesn't stretch all the way down to the length of
Jixor - Stephen I wrote:
Regnard Kreisler C. Raquedan wrote:
Hello,
I have a little problem with a border with a site I'm doing. The
prototype's URL is http://www.raquedan.com/quickinfo.
My 3-column lay-out has a bit of a snag. The left-most sub-column has
a border that doesn't stretch all the way
Thanks for the suggestion! :)
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:29:35 +1100, Jixor - Stephen I [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jixor - Stephen I wrote:
Regnard Kreisler C. Raquedan wrote:
Hello,
I have a little problem with a border with a site I'm doing. The
prototype's URL is
201 - 300 of 443 matches
Mail list logo
