RE: [WSG] Tentative validation

2005-02-09 Thread Paul
Thanks I added a content type in my header but it is telling me the
issue lies with this line:

!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd; and I should
change it to the new xhtml 1.1 transitional doctype, how does that
doctype differ from what I am using, besides replacing Strict with
Transitional.

Paul

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Isac Backlund
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 6:44 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Tentative validation


Paul skrev:

 When I am validating I always seem to only tentatively validate ( i.e
 http://www.speakupnow.ca/wu/audiovideo.php ) , is there something I 
 can add to my code to make it fully validate?
  
 Paul

Hi.
Try adding at content-type

meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1

mv icaaq



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Tentative validation

2005-02-09 Thread Peter Firminger
You have a mixed doctype, the declaration says strict but the uri points to
the transitional dtd.

P

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
 Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 11:28 PM
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: RE: [WSG] Tentative validation

 Thanks I added a content type in my header but it is telling me the
 issue lies with this line:

 !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
 http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
 and I should
 change it to the new xhtml 1.1 transitional doctype, how does that
 doctype differ from what I am using, besides replacing Strict with
 Transitional.

 Paul

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Isac Backlund
 Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 6:44 PM
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: Re: [WSG] Tentative validation


 Paul skrev:

  When I am validating I always seem to only tentatively
 validate ( i.e
  http://www.speakupnow.ca/wu/audiovideo.php ) , is there something I
  can add to my code to make it fully validate?
 
  Paul

 Hi.
 Try adding at content-type

 meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
 charset=iso-8859-1

 mv icaaq



 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **

 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Tentative validation

2005-02-09 Thread Hopkins Programming
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;

Read more at: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#docconf

--Zachary

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 09:11:21 -0330, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So what is the pure transitional doctype:
 
 !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
 http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd; ?
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Peter Firminger
 Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 9:02 AM
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: RE: [WSG] Tentative validation
 
 You have a mixed doctype, the declaration says strict but the uri points
 to the transitional dtd.
 
 P
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On Behalf Of Paul
  Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 11:28 PM
  To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
  Subject: RE: [WSG] Tentative validation
 
  Thanks I added a content type in my header but it is telling me the
  issue lies with this line:
 
  !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
  http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
  and I should
  change it to the new xhtml 1.1 transitional doctype, how does that
  doctype differ from what I am using, besides replacing Strict with
  Transitional.
 
  Paul
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On Behalf Of Isac Backlund
  Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 6:44 PM
  To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
  Subject: Re: [WSG] Tentative validation
 
 
  Paul skrev:
 
   When I am validating I always seem to only tentatively
  validate ( i.e
   http://www.speakupnow.ca/wu/audiovideo.php ) , is there something I
   can add to my code to make it fully validate?
  
   Paul
 
  Hi.
  Try adding at content-type
 
  meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
  charset=iso-8859-1
 
  mv icaaq
 
 
 
  **
  The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
   See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
   for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
  **
 
  **
  The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
   See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
   for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
  **
 
 
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 


-- 
==
The best way to predict the future is to invent it. 

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Tentative validation

2005-02-09 Thread russ - maxdesign
 So what is the pure transitional doctype:
 
 !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
 http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd; ?

Go to the source:
http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html

So you need to choose:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
   http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;

or:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
   http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;

Russ


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] Tentative validation

2005-02-08 Thread Paul
Title: Message



When I am validating 
I always seem to only tentatively validate ( i.e http://www.speakupnow.ca/wu/audiovideo.php) 
, is there something I can add to my code to make it fully 
validate?

Paul


Re: [WSG] Tentative validation

2005-02-08 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Paul wrote:
When I am validating I always seem to only tentatively validate ( i.e 
http://www.speakupnow.ca/wu/audiovideo.php ) , is there something I can 
add to my code to make it fully validate?
Well, the validator actually tells you exactly what's wrong and how to 
fix it...
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A//www.speakupnow.ca/wu/audiovideo.php

 I was not able to extract a character encoding labeling from any of 
the valid sources for such information. Without encoding information it 
is impossible to reliably validate the document.

--
Patrick H. Lauke
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Tentative validation

2005-02-08 Thread Isac Backlund
Paul skrev:
When I am validating I always seem to only tentatively validate ( i.e 
http://www.speakupnow.ca/wu/audiovideo.php ) , is there something I 
can add to my code to make it fully validate?
 
Paul
Hi.
Try adding at content-type
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
mv icaaq

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**