Re: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

2008-09-07 Thread Ben Buchanan
 Before you add accesskeys, check out

 http://www.wcagsamurai.org/errata/errata.html#GL9 ... basically the
  errata captures best practice methodology as it evolved in the years
  after WCAG 1.0 was released. Accesskeys are problematic between

 it says not to use them...
 but ... what about mobile sites?
 (where you might want to use keypad shortcuts for ease of use with a
 very tiny mobile phone screen)

WCAG 1.0 was released in 1999 - ie. before people seriously started using
the web on mobiles - and the errata address WCAG 1.0. Realistically it's
about web pages for computers, not mobile-specific web pages.

For mobile sites, I'd look at Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 (
http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/), released just a few weeks back. Based off
a *very* quick look, it does appear to recommend/allow accesskeys, although
given that this directly conflicts with the Samurai-updated guidelines for
general web pages, I'd only use accesskeys for *dedicated* mobile sites.

If one site is doing both general web and mobile web duty, personally I'd
suggest that conflicts should be resolved in favour of general web
guidelines. At this stage, that's still doing the greatest good for the
greatest number. But I'd also expect that this point will be debated more as
the lines between mobile/general web blur further.

cheers,

Ben

-- 
--- http://weblog.200ok.com.au/
--- The future has arrived; it's just not
--- evenly distributed. - William Gibson


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

2008-09-07 Thread MichaelMD

 
 Before you add accesskeys, check out
 http://www.wcagsamurai.org/errata/errata.html#GL9 ... basically the
 errata captures best practice methodology as it evolved in the years
 after WCAG 1.0 was released. Accesskeys are problematic between

it says not to use them...

but ... what about mobile sites?
(where you might want to use keypad shortcuts for ease of use with a
very tiny mobile phone screen)







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

2008-09-07 Thread Christian Montoya
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:25 PM, dwain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 i've read the following two articles and i would entertain some
 feedback on using access keys.  i'm slowly bringing my web site up to
 better accessibility standards and i have a few more things to do like
 add a skip nav link and access keys.  any other articles and resources
 would be appreciated for both subjects.

 http://www.alistapart.com/articles/accesskeys/

 http://www.sitepoint.com/article/accesskeys/

I would say that unless you have a very specific need within a web app
where you need to capture more usage options than just the standard
mouse  keyboard, don't use accesskeys. Don't use tabindex either. I
hate running into cookie-cutter weblogs and such that don't need these
things but use them anyway, making the expected use-case scenarios
very confusing.


-- 
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.net


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

2008-09-07 Thread Thierry Koblentz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ben Buchanan
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 3:21 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

 Before you add accesskeys, check out
 http://www.wcagsamurai.org/errata/errata.html#GL9 ... basically the
 errata captures best practice methodology as it evolved in the years
 after WCAG 1.0 was released. Accesskeys are problematic between
it says not to use them...
but ... what about mobile sites?
(where you might want to use keypad shortcuts for ease of use with a
very tiny mobile phone screen)
WCAG 1.0 was released in 1999 - ie. before people seriously started using
the web on mobiles - and the errata address WCAG 1.0. Realistically it's
about web pages for computers, not mobile-specific web pages.
For mobile sites, I'd look at Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0
(http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/), released just a few weeks back. Based off
a *very* quick look, it does appear to recommend/allow accesskeys, although
given that this directly conflicts with the Samurai-updated guidelines for
general web pages, I'd only use accesskeys for *dedicated* mobile sites.
If one site is doing both general web and mobile web duty, personally I'd
suggest that conflicts should be resolved in favour of general web
guidelines. At this stage, that's still doing the greatest good for the
greatest number. But I'd also expect that this point will be debated more as
the lines between mobile/general web blur further. 


May be a better approach would be to use a script that lets the user turn
accesskeys on.


-- 
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

2008-09-07 Thread Michael MD


May be a better approach would be to use a script that lets the user turn
accesskeys on.


If you are talking about any kind of client side scripting, such as 
javascript that is a big no-no ... as very few phones are likely to support 
it!


yes the iPhone can do javascript and to a limited extent Opera Lite (as in 
running on their server rather than on the phone iteself)...
but is there much else? ... those would probably currently account for only 
a very tiny fraction of real-world mobile traffic.


... and can I trust EVERY phone browser to completely ignore scripting that 
it doesn't support?
...without the resources to test on a wide variety of phones I take the 
route of caution - though I can see myself probably having to install WURFL 
eventually
(a database of known phone models and their capabilities - browser sniffing 
taken to the extreme!)






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

2008-09-07 Thread Thierry Koblentz
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Michael MD
 Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 8:03 PM
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: Re: [WSG] best practices for using access keys
 
 
  May be a better approach would be to use a script that lets the user
turn
  accesskeys on.
 
 If you are talking about any kind of client side scripting, such as
 javascript that is a big no-no ... as very few phones are likely to
support
 it!


No, it'd be server-side (as the solution I posted earlier).


-- 
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

2008-09-06 Thread dwain
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Gonzalo González Mora
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:25 PM, dwain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Dwain,
 You might find this article interesting:
 http://www.rnib.org.uk/wacblog/articles/too-much-accessibility/too-too-much-accessibility-accesskeys/
 Make sure you read the comments, theres' some really good info there.

thanks gonzalo, i'll give it a read.
cheers,
dwain

-- 
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin
Franklin

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

2008-09-06 Thread dwain
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://tjkdesign.com/articles/user_defined_accesskeys.asp

thanks thierry, i know this will be a good one.
cheers,
dwain

-- 
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin
Franklin


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

2008-09-06 Thread Ben Buchanan
i'm slowly bringing my web site up to better accessibility standards

and i have a few more things to do like add a skip nav link and access keys.


Before you add accesskeys, check out
http://www.wcagsamurai.org/errata/errata.html#GL9 ... basically the errata
captures best practice methodology as it evolved in the years after WCAG 1.0
was released. Accesskeys are problematic between browsers and other software
so in general I think the concensus is to concentrate on making the site
accessible and usable without custom keyboard controls. eg. rather than an
accesskey for your site's search box, use your skip menu to provide a jump
link at the start of the document (and not everyone will agree with me even
on that point ;)).

It's kind of similar to the whole issue of tabindex - don't use it, instead
make sure the natural tab order is logical. Same general principle.

cheers,

Ben

-- 
--- http://weblog.200ok.com.au/
--- The future has arrived; it's just not
--- evenly distributed. - William Gibson


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

2008-09-06 Thread dwain
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Ben Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Before you add accesskeys, check out
 http://www.wcagsamurai.org/errata/errata.html#GL9

hoo hah, that's some pretty heavy stuff.  what an eye opener.  i guess
i've done about all i can do except for a skip nav to content link.
i've used all the accessibility tools at my disposal and i seem to be
in compliance.  i guess you can't cover all of the accessibility bases
for everybody, but you can be as accessible as you can be.

thanks for the great read.

cheers,
dwain


-- 
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin
Franklin


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



[WSG] best practices for using access keys

2008-09-05 Thread dwain
i've read the following two articles and i would entertain some
feedback on using access keys.  i'm slowly bringing my web site up to
better accessibility standards and i have a few more things to do like
add a skip nav link and access keys.  any other articles and resources
would be appreciated for both subjects.

http://www.alistapart.com/articles/accesskeys/

http://www.sitepoint.com/article/accesskeys/

cheers,
dwain

-- 
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin
Franklin


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

2008-09-05 Thread Gonzalo González Mora
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:25 PM, dwain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 i've read the following two articles and i would entertain some
 feedback on using access keys.  i'm slowly bringing my web site up to
 better accessibility standards and i have a few more things to do like
 add a skip nav link and access keys.  any other articles and resources
 would be appreciated for both subjects.

 http://www.alistapart.com/articles/accesskeys/

 http://www.sitepoint.com/article/accesskeys/

 cheers,
 dwain

 --
 Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little
 temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin
 Franklin


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***


Hi Dwain,
You might find this article interesting:
http://www.rnib.org.uk/wacblog/articles/too-much-accessibility/too-too-much-accessibility-accesskeys/Make
sure you read the comments, theres' some really good info there.

Gonzalo González Mora


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


RE: [WSG] best practices for using access keys

2008-09-05 Thread Thierry Koblentz
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of dwain
 Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 7:25 PM
 To: web standards group
 Subject: [WSG] best practices for using access keys
 
 i've read the following two articles and i would entertain some
 feedback on using access keys.  i'm slowly bringing my web site up to
 better accessibility standards and i have a few more things to do like
 add a skip nav link and access keys.  any other articles and resources
 would be appreciated for both subjects.
 
 http://www.alistapart.com/articles/accesskeys/
 
 http://www.sitepoint.com/article/accesskeys/


http://tjkdesign.com/articles/user_defined_accesskeys.asp

-- 
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***