Re: [WSG] 1to1 markup suggestions
I've always seen a definition list as a simpler way of representing any 2-column table with implied column headers of term and definition or property and value. So according to me (and i AM perfect after all), both would be correct. A definition list would be simpler, and a table would give you more flexibility, but both would be correct. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] 1to1 markup suggestions
Koen Willems wrote: To my opinion it would depend on the fact if there is only a relation between the data or if one is defining the other. There is no hard correlation between them. the data would be similar to this: @ | at $ | dollar sign Going like that, its easy to see that column B defines column A symbol. But, along the same lines, it could be grouped with a thead like thSymbol/ththMeaning/th *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
RE: [WSG] 1to1 markup suggestions
To my opinion it would depend on the fact if there is only a relation between the data or if one is defining the other. Koen Willems -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Brian Cummiskey Verzonden: donderdag 23 augustus 2007 19:48 Aan: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Onderwerp: [WSG] 1to1 markup suggestions i have some data 1 | A 2 | B and so on in a 1-to-1 I'm considering using a DL as A defines the symbol 1 but at the same time it is tabular data. Thoughts? *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
