On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 07:06:21 +0100, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your code is compliant then just about every browser out there will be
able to generate
it with a 90% accuracy regarding design and 100% accuracy regarding content.
What kind of make believe web do you design for? Every
On Tue February 8 2005 09:22, Andrew Krespanis wrote:
What kind of make believe web do you design for? Every day I deal with
horribly incorrect (according to spec) rendering across all but the
latest of browsers -- and before you respond, I can assure you the
code in question is clean as
OOPS! I just swore on list
SORRY :)
http://leftjustified.net/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the
Well I suggest you name names and show examples of compliant html 4.01 that
doesn't show 100% of the intented content and doesn't at least resemble like
what you intented.
Compliant html pages styled completely with CSS displaying bugs? Easy,
I would make some examples for you now if I wasn't
Andrew Krespanis wrote:
OOPS! I just swore on listSORRY :)
---
LOL.
First time a long while I've actually gotten a laugh from this list.
Cheers,
Mike Pepper
Accessible Web Developer
Internet SEO and Marketing Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.visidigm.com
Administrator
Guild of
G'day
Paul wrote:
This is more of a general standards question, but if you are designing a
page for the public in general (in my case a university) at what point (
% wise _or_ # of browsers) do you say 'Okay this is the site, no more
trying to accommodate obscure browsers/older versions of
Paul wrote:
This is more of a general standards question, but if you are
designing a page for the public in general (in my case a university)
at what point ( % wise _or_ # of browsers) do you say 'Okay this is
the site, no more trying to accommodate obscure browsers/older
versions of browsers.
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:57:06 +0800, Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really depends on the audience, the client, etc but I usually draw the
line at 5th generation browsers (MSIE5+, Opera 5+, Netscape 6/7,
Firefox, Mozilla, Safari, etc)
You can totally ignore Opera 5 and 6.
92% of Opera
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:03:30 -0330, Paul wrote:
This is more of a general standards question, but if you are designing a
page for the public in general (in my case a university) at what point (
% wise _or_ # of browsers) do you say 'Okay this is the site, no more
trying to accommodate obscure
This is more of a general standards question, but if you are designing a
page for the public in general (in my case a university) at what point (
% wise _or_ # of browsers) do you say 'Okay this is the site, no more
trying to accommodate obscure browsers/older versions of browsers. ? I
know
Hi
Altough others may use other standards, I for one don't care all that much
about browser percentage. HTML 4 exists more then 10 years now and users with
browsers that don't understand HTML 4 can't be all that interested in your
site anyway.
So with this in mind, I set my doctype to 4.01
11 matches
Mail list logo
