Nathan de Vries writed:
In other words, Microsoft are effectively creating their own HTML-
email standard, authorable and viewable in Microsoft tools only.
So, what else is new?
:o)
--
I made magic once. Now, the sofa is gone.
http://blog.dwacon.com
Indeed.
Here's Microsoft's 'totally up-themselves' response.
I'm sure they'd welcome comments ;)
http://blogs.msdn.com/outlook/archive/2009/06/24/the-power-of-word-in-outlook.aspx
On 25/06/2009, at 4:37 PM, Conyers, Dwayne wrote:
Nathan de Vries writed:
In other words, Microsoft are
We have a problem! Outlook 2010, according to Campaign Monitor [1], is
going to continue to use the crippled MS Word layout engine. They adopted
this as the status quo for
Outlook 2007 and promptly set rich email with CSS, etc., back a number
of years, and are showing no great sign of diverging
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Joshua Street josh.str...@gmail.comwrote:
We have a problem! Outlook 2010, according to Campaign Monitor [1], is
going to continue to use the crippled MS Word layout engine. FixOutlook.org
aims to collate the community's discontent with this decision using
On 24/06/2009, at 9:58 PM, Matthew Pennell wrote:
This is so stupid - the reason that Outlook uses Word instead of a
decent rendering engine is because of the same standards advocates
complaining so much about IE6 being bundled with Windows! You can't
have your cake and eat it too...
You
Nathan,
I think you are slightly missing the point, I for one don't care too
hoots if microsoft uses its own rendering engine or not. All I care is
that they use one that works and I think this is the main point of the
campaign. I pretty much left web design a few years back because I
On 24/06/2009, at 11:40 PM, Andrew Stewart wrote:
I think you are slightly missing the point...
You might want to re-read (or read) my email.
I was responding to Matthew, who was implying that Microsoft's
decision to use Word as the rendering engine was due to Opera's
complaint to The
Michael MD wroted:
WHY do I have to stuff around with regedit to be
able to do view source in current versions of
Outlook?
Can you pass on that trick? I would love to be able to view source...
--
The generation that took acid to escape reality is now taking antacid to deal
with reality
On 24/06/2009, at 9:58 PM, Matthew Pennell wrote:
...the reason that Outlook uses Word instead of a decent rendering
engine is because of the same standards advocates complaining so
much about IE6 being bundled with Windows!
Microsoft have since responded to the campaign [1] and thrown this
