Re: SPAM-MED: Re: [WSG] Flash replace Javascript in Future?

2008-10-20 Thread Rick Lecoat 

On 20 Oct 2008, at 10:26, kevin mcmonagle wrote:


micheal md wrote:
>>I tend to avoid using anything that needs flash player 9 where  
possible and so far I haven't found

anything I needed to do that really needed actionscript 3  

How about flv?


IIRC flv came in with Flash 8

--
Rick Lecoat



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: SPAM-MED: Re: [WSG] Flash replace Javascript in Future?

2008-10-20 Thread kevin mcmonagle 

micheal md wrote:
>>I tend to avoid using anything that needs flash player 9 where 
possible and so far I haven't found

anything I needed to do that really needed actionscript 3  

How about flv?

-best
kevin



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***