Hi all,

I'm mooting the idea of having a pool of web designers/developers who have
an interest in OpenSource projects to provide voluntary services for
creating their web fronts. Most OpenSource projects have zilch-nada budget
for marketing and the cheapest avenue is the web. However, as OpenSource
projects' scope are often far beyond that of web design and standards, the
good folks behind these projects may have no idea of what is a good and
effective standards-compliant website. Their websites may just be quick and
dirty content that are chockfull of tables, graphic text yadda yadda. No
fault of theirs, especially if they're a bunch of systems programmers who
previously had no business being on the web. These people need help, and if
they ask for it, it'd be good to have a pool of like-minded web pros who are
willing to contribute.

I got this idea from the concept behind http://www.openusability.org, where
a bunch of usability experts created a pool ready to provide their skills to
OpenSource projects who register their projects with them. You can surf over
to their website to check out their structure and how they provide their
services.

Why is it important for these guys to get the help they need? A lot of the
people behind these projects don't really get the web. They vaguely know
it's an ideal publishing avenue but that's about it. All of us here know
that it's not just "we build it and they'll come". Plus, the fact is that a
number of these sites contribute to the proliferation of non-compliant and
badly conceptualized websites littering the cyberscape. Heck, even the
default theme that ships with Mambo, an OpenSource WEB CMS, uses tables to
shoehorn the layout.

Obviously, if you have no love for OpenSource, this email wouldn't matter to
you. What I'm trying to do at this point is to gather a group of people who
do support OpenSource and are willing to contribute some time and resources
towards this. No, I don't expect that any of us will be getting paid for
this. But I guess if you're into this kinda thing, the philantrophical
streak already runs in your blood. Plus there's that little thing called
exposure if your particular project hits the limelight.

I've made an initial shortlist of services that we can provide:

1) Help them understand the difference between a publicity and developer
site for their project. Most of them mix the two up and in a lot of cases
this is not the right tack to take.
2) Help them conceptualize a presentable and standards-compliant website.
3) If possible, set them up with (or help them to do so) a simple CMS such
that they can do self updates (no, I don't feel that we should be the one
doing all the data entry especially when we do not even understand the
content and actual scope of the project itself)

I'm fine with discussing this off-list if a high volume of folks (or even a
single moderator) here find it non-relevant to them.

Oh, BTW, the name's Wong. I'm thus far more a lurker than anything else. I'm
a web developer based in Malaysia, which I do while trying to be a
small-time local OpenSource evangelist as well. 

Some of the sites to show you what I'm talking about:
1) http://www.slackware.org (table-based)
2) http://www.kanotix.org/ (frames on something as simple as this?!?!?)
3) http://fluxbox.org/version-0.9.php (ah, looks like some thought went into
the design itself, but the inner workings are still very old school)

Interested parties can either email me privately or here (while the
objections have not started).

Thanks!
Wong

Note: A copy of this email is being sent to the Web Design List as well.



******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to