hi all,
it may be that FF sucks sometimes a bit,
the application-size is already reaching 40mb on my system,
anyway - it is still the best solution for a browser,
except for O 8.5 - that one has the facilities to get better maybe ...
but FF is the icon and the symbol for Open Source getting
Helmut Granda wrote:
. . .
it seems like FF is loosing terrain, is w3schools accurate?
No they're not, in fact I think there is a note about how they are no
accurate on the page there.
Or is there
anyother place that I can check what the general public is using.
There are 3 kinds of
In my experience Firefox runs a lot better on linux, and even faster onWindows. A lot of the stuff that firefox does on linux it could really
improve. I think the reason that it's like that is because most of themain developers use windows and they're trying to appeal to themainstream (i.e.
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 02:58 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
I think of it more as, on Mac there is a decent browser (safari). So
there isn't much need for FF there. Whereas PC users really need FF.
It's also worth remembering Opera have recently released their browser
for free (as in beer), so
Here are some other browser stat resources for what they are worth...
http://www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/stat.htm
http://www.webreference.com/stats/browser.html
http://www.echoecho.com/
http://www.thecounter.com/stats/
Stuart Sherwood
www.re-entity.com
For what I see in:
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
it seems like FF is loosing terrain, is
w3schools accurate? Or is there anyother place that I can check what the
general public is using.
This is for General Public, I know I can
look in my logs to see my
On 10/12/05 10:43 PM Helmut Granda [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this
out:
it seems like FF is loosing terrain, is w3schools accurate?
It's accurate in my case.
On Mac, I think FF pretty well s*cks - what with stuck menus and stalls and
all that sort of thing. I went back to Safari after about 2
On Mar 24, 2004, at 8:33 PM, Kym Kovan wrote:
I just did a test on 3 sites here, one very local, one national and
one global. (very rounded numbers)
Just for comparison, here's the stats from my blog and my website
(which is tracked separated to the blog):
blogsite
IE6.x
I actually decided to look in detail at my logs over the past month after
people brought up the Browser compatibility issues:
This is what I have for my site www.thegrafixguy.com and I get an average of
1 unique visitors a month.
MSIE all versions 74.9%
Netscape 1.8% (Man they Seriously
Wow what the hell happened to NS??!! Going by those figures I should be
focassing my attention to Mozilla compatability. Thanks for the stats.
Darian
I actually decided to look in detail at my logs over the past month after
people brought up the Browser compatibility issues:
This is what I
]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Browser Stats - What a shock!
Wow what the hell happened to NS??!! Going by those figures I should be
focassing my attention to Mozilla compatability. Thanks for the stats.
Darian
I actually decided to look
for giggles
Anything below MSIE 5 is a combined total of 0.0025%
Brian
-Original Message-
From: James Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 4:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Browser Stats - What a shock!
Hi
Do the Netscape stats include 6 7
with 9.6%.
Oscar
Oscar Trelles
http://www.oscartrelles.com/blog/
- Original Message -
From: theGrafixGuy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 7:32 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] Browser Stats - What a shock!
I just downloaded the latest NS 7.01 and it is nothing
this is way off topic so I am shutting up!
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Oscar Trelles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 6:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Browser Stats - What a shock!
I posted a link to some fresh web statistics from the W3C on my blog
loss of market share!
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Browser Stats - What a shock!
Wow what the hell happened to NS??!! Going by those figures I should be
focassing
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:34:55 +1000 (EST), Darian Cabot wrote:
Those weren't my website stats (_) My aim is to support all major
browsers be it ie, nn, moz, or anything. I just stated that if moz is more
popular than nn then I'm better off prioritizing that first :)
I think the point is that
Hi Kym
I made the mistake thinking the numbers came from just Darian's site or
was i Brian's. But I see now, that you got the numbers from a much
larger sample pool. I stand corrected, My point was that sample size
and where it came from makes all the difference in the world of
statistics.
: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Browser Stats - What a shock!
Wow what the hell happened to NS??!! Going by those figures I should
be
focassing my attention to Mozilla compatability. Thanks for the
stats.
Darian
I actually decided to look in detail at my
18 matches
Mail list logo
