I've got to say the new version of Contribute is excellent in its ease
of use, CSS support, (x)HTML standards compliance and accessibility
support. I'm really starting to see it as the main option for
non-enterprise level content management.
Strongly suggest you try it.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden
see
http://webstandardsgroup.org/go/resource131.cfm for details.
P
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph Lindsay
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 7:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [WSG] Content Manage
I imagine new versions of Contribute are pretty good (there's a demo,
why not try it out?).
It depends on how much they need to do -- if it's just basic formatting
of text, I'd say Textile[1] or Markdown[2] which are ASCI-to-XHTML
converters with simple "shorthand" for links, bold, italics, etc
OTECTED]
> Date: Thu, Sep-9-2004 9:36 AM
> Subject: [WSG] Content Management tools for non-tech authors
>
> Does anybody have any experience with any content management tools
> that produce standards compliant code, and can be used by
> non-standards-savy authors?
>
> Does
Does anybody have any experience with any content management tools
that produce standards compliant code, and can be used by
non-standards-savy authors?
Does macromedia contribute produce good code? Editize? any other tools
out there?
**
The disc
