Re: [WSG] Critique please

2004-07-16 Thread Kyle Barrow
Looks good on Safari and validates in the W3C validator. Not a validation issue but more contrast between some or your text and background colours will improve accessibility. Cheers Kyle On 2004 Jul 16, , at 14:26, Richard Lake wrote: Could you critique http://www.pricklypair.co.nz for me

Re: [WSG] Critique please

2004-07-16 Thread Mark Stanton
Hi Richard I really like it - maybe three small comments, all very minor: 1) You're using inline styles in a number of places. 2) div id =' footnav' - there is a space in front of a number of your id attribute values. Not sure how this would affect CSS, JS, etc.. 3) indent is a poor choice

Re: [WSG] Critique please

2004-07-16 Thread Neerav
Richard Not bad, If you hadnt told me I wouldnt have known it was a first attempt. The only 3 problems I found were: 1. http://www.pricklypair.co.nz/contactus.php lets me enter the fullstop character for all fields, you need to validate to at least check for an @ sign 2. The white bird of

[WSG] Critique please

2004-07-15 Thread Richard Lake
Could you critique http://www.pricklypair.co.nz for me please. I've aimed to be standards compliant and accessible but I'm sure there's still some work to do in that area. This is my first PHP/mySQL site and there's still some work to be done around the ordering area etc, but it works pretty much