Looks good on Safari and validates in the W3C validator. Not a
validation issue but more contrast between some or your text and
background colours will improve accessibility.
Cheers
Kyle
On 2004 Jul 16, , at 14:26, Richard Lake wrote:
Could you critique http://www.pricklypair.co.nz for me
Hi Richard
I really like it - maybe three small comments, all very minor:
1) You're using inline styles in a number of places.
2) div id =' footnav' - there is a space in front of a number of
your id attribute values. Not sure how this would affect CSS, JS,
etc..
3) indent is a poor choice
Richard
Not bad, If you hadnt told me I wouldnt have known it was a first attempt.
The only 3 problems I found were:
1. http://www.pricklypair.co.nz/contactus.php lets me enter the fullstop
character for all fields, you need to validate to at least check for an
@ sign
2. The white bird of
Could you critique http://www.pricklypair.co.nz for me please. I've aimed to
be standards compliant and accessible but I'm sure there's still some work
to do in that area.
This is my first PHP/mySQL site and there's still some work to be done
around the ordering area etc, but it works pretty much