Re: [WSG] Critique please
Richard Not bad, If you hadnt told me I wouldnt have known it was a first attempt. The only 3 problems I found were: 1. http://www.pricklypair.co.nz/contactus.php lets me enter the fullstop character for all fields, you need to validate to at least check for an @ sign 2. The white bird of paradise photo http://pricklypair.co.nz/images/strelnic.jpg is missing 3. When a page/image is not found, a standard 404 error is displayed. You can customize your server's error message so your users are not struck with this unhelpful error by creating a custom 404 error page eg: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2003/02/13/davidsklar.html -- Neerav Bhatt http://www.bhatt.id.au Web Development & IT consultancy Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27 http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/neerav Richard Lake wrote: Could you critique http://www.pricklypair.co.nz for me please. I've aimed to be standards compliant and accessible but I'm sure there's still some work to do in that area. This is my first PHP/mySQL site and there's still some work to be done around the ordering area etc, but it works pretty much the way I'd designed it to. I'd really welcome your comments. TIA Richard * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *
Re: [WSG] Critique please
Hi Richard I really like it - maybe three small comments, all very minor: 1) You're using inline styles in a number of places. 2) - there is a space in front of a number of your id attribute values. Not sure how this would affect CSS, JS, etc.. 3) "indent" is a poor choice for a class name. Describe *why* the data in presented the way it is, rather than describing the presentation. 9.5 out of 10. Good stuff. -- Mark Stanton Gruden Pty Ltd http://www.gruden.com * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *
Re: [WSG] Critique please
Looks good on Safari and validates in the W3C validator. Not a validation issue but more contrast between some or your text and background colours will improve accessibility. Cheers Kyle On 2004 Jul 16, , at 14:26, Richard Lake wrote: Could you critique http://www.pricklypair.co.nz for me please. I've aimed to be standards compliant and accessible but I'm sure there's still some work to do in that area. This is my first PHP/mySQL site and there's still some work to be done around the ordering area etc, but it works pretty much the way I'd designed it to. I'd really welcome your comments. TIA Richard -- mobile web gear | pukupi.com * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *
[WSG] Critique please
Could you critique http://www.pricklypair.co.nz for me please. I've aimed to be standards compliant and accessible but I'm sure there's still some work to do in that area. This is my first PHP/mySQL site and there's still some work to be done around the ordering area etc, but it works pretty much the way I'd designed it to. I'd really welcome your comments. TIA Richard * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *