If all heck is breaking loose on your floated objects in IE.
Add position:relative and it may cure the problem.
Sure, it is better to break it all down and try a more bullet-proof design.
But sometimes its better to just go with the quick fix.
Ted
-Original Message-
Adam Morris wrot
Adam Morris wrote:
What is this bug in IE/Win that you need "position: relative;" for?
Parts of the float that's overflowing the outer container when pulled
like this, will become invisible.
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
**
The discussion list
That's great! Using margins instead of relative positioning has placed
the image in IE Mac too!
What is this bug in IE/Win that you need "position: relative;" for?
On 05/10/05, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Morris wrote:
> > Is there a way to accurately and seamlessly position t
Adam Morris wrote:
Is there a way to accurately and seamlessly position this image over
the background?
http://www.janelehrer.co.uk/uwish/girls.html
.tornpic {
width:350px;
height:316px;
float: right;
margin: -113px -24px 0 0;
background: url(tornpic0.jpg) no-repeat;
position: relative;
}
BTW the floated page is here:
http://www.janelehrer.co.uk/uwish1/girls.html
On 05/10/05, Adam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to seemingly use this group to have a conversation with myself
> but I have been working on my problem and floated the image within the
> wrapper and then used r
Sorry to seemingly use this group to have a conversation with myself
but I have been working on my problem and floated the image within the
wrapper and then used relative positioning! Is this a valid method?
The site works in IE for PC and Safari and Firefox for Mac. In Mac IE,
though, the relative
Is there a way to accurately and seamlessly position this image over
the background? At the moment, a percentage left position doesn't
quite do the job.
Or am I barking up the wrong tree?
http://www.janelehrer.co.uk/uwish/girls.html
**
The discus
