RE: [WSG] Dreamweaver : was [ Standards Macromedia Contribute]

2004-12-16 Thread Sam Hutchinson
://www.actiontransporttheatre.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Ellis Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 02:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] Dreamweaver : was [ Standards Macromedia Contribute] Hi all This is a good discussion

Re: [WSG] Dreamweaver : was [ Standards Macromedia Contribute]

2004-12-16 Thread David R
Post below: Michael Wilson wrote: I use Dreamweaver MX 2004 and, although I'm not certain what settings I may have changed since the initial install, I don't recall making any major adjustments to the preferences since that time. I believe I ticked on Make document XHTML compliant and set the

Re: [WSG] Dreamweaver : was [ Standards Macromedia Contribute]

2004-12-16 Thread heretic
Hi, Michael Wilson wrote: What would you consider to be the key standards and accessibility settings for Dreamweaver that some of us might be overlooking? The settings I recommend to people at work Accessibility tab: Enable all of the Show Attributes when Inserting options Code Format

Re: [WSG] Dreamweaver : was [ Standards Macromedia Contribute]

2004-12-16 Thread James Ellis
Dreamweaver does, however, still fail on the object tag, especilly for the Flash template. Hi David Have your tried exporting a compliant template from Flash itself? Not sure if you can do this in DW? I did some experiments in this last year http://www.webqs.com/experiment.php?id=15

Re: [WSG] Dreamweaver : was [ Standards Macromedia Contribute]

2004-12-15 Thread Terrence Wood
isn't the DWMX editor essentially homesite anyway? I'm a mac user so I've never seen or used homesite. Terrence Wood. On 2004-12-16 2:39 PM, heretic wrote: Realistically... we probably could have stuck with HomeSite :) -- You know you've achieved perfection in design, not when you have nothing

Re: [WSG] Dreamweaver : was [ Standards Macromedia Contribute]

2004-12-15 Thread James Ellis
Hi all This is a good discussion, lets try and keep it on how to apply the mentioned software to create standards compliant content rather than a rundown of its various features and comparison to other software. Cheers James admin On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 13:41:42 +1100, Natalie Buxton

[WSG] Dreamweaver : was [ Standards Macromedia Contribute]

2004-12-15 Thread designer
Hi Mario and all, - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:45 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Standards Macromedia Contribute Also, I must admit I'm growing rather weary of all the negative remarks about Dreamweaver. From my humble perspective I use

Re: [WSG] Dreamweaver : was [ Standards Macromedia Contribute]

2004-12-15 Thread heretic
Hi all (hmm, this would be a de-lurk..), Also, I must admit I'm growing rather weary of all the negative remarks about Dreamweaver. From my humble perspective I use Dreamweaver MX 2004 I must say I agree. As with all tools, you find out how best to use them and what (if any) downsides there

Re: [WSG] Dreamweaver : was [ Standards Macromedia Contribute]

2004-12-15 Thread Natalie Buxton
This is probably getting OT... The DW editor isn't much like homesite at all anymore. Many more advanced features. It is worth downloading the free demo and having a look using CODE VIEW. Lots of built in things I like - the Oreilly's pocket guides, the inbuilt validation controls and the