Re: [WSG] HTML5 Elements question

2011-08-17 Thread Tom Livingston
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Patrick H. Lauke
 wrote:
> On 17/08/2011 15:04, Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> Just trying to get a better grip on the proper use of the new
>> elements. I have a site with a persistent nav of the site on the top
>> of the page and on a couple pages, a large designed grid with nice
>> hover effects that mirrors the persistent nav. The persistent nav has
>> role="navigation" and I was thinking the grids should also be the nav
>> element sans role. Am I tracking this right? Or is the grid not a case
>> for the nav element? The grids and top nav are site-wide navigation
>> within large sections of the site, not the ENTIRE site as a whole -
>> it's based on what group you fall in, like "members" etc.
>
> If I understand it right, I'd say that yes,  seems appropriate for the
> grid as well - though keep in mind that there's no ONE TRUE WAY(TM) to mark
> anything up semantically, so opinions may vary ;)
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke


Thank you Patrick. That was my thought as well.


-- 

Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] HTML5 Elements question

2011-08-17 Thread Patrick H. Lauke

On 17/08/2011 15:04, Tom Livingston wrote:

Just trying to get a better grip on the proper use of the new
elements. I have a site with a persistent nav of the site on the top
of the page and on a couple pages, a large designed grid with nice
hover effects that mirrors the persistent nav. The persistent nav has
role="navigation" and I was thinking the grids should also be the nav
element sans role. Am I tracking this right? Or is the grid not a case
for the nav element? The grids and top nav are site-wide navigation
within large sections of the site, not the ENTIRE site as a whole -
it's based on what group you fall in, like "members" etc.


If I understand it right, I'd say that yes,  seems appropriate for 
the grid as well - though keep in mind that there's no ONE TRUE WAY(TM) 
to mark anything up semantically, so opinions may vary ;)


P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]

www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
__
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
__


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



[WSG] HTML5 Elements question

2011-08-17 Thread Tom Livingston
List,

Just trying to get a better grip on the proper use of the new
elements. I have a site with a persistent nav of the site on the top
of the page and on a couple pages, a large designed grid with nice
hover effects that mirrors the persistent nav. The persistent nav has
role="navigation" and I was thinking the grids should also be the nav
element sans role. Am I tracking this right? Or is the grid not a case
for the nav element? The grids and top nav are site-wide navigation
within large sections of the site, not the ENTIRE site as a whole -
it's based on what group you fall in, like "members" etc.

Thanks in advance.

-- 

Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***