> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yes, but if you have flash plug-in, you cannot see alternative image.
> So, the only reason is that when you don't have flash
> installed, browser
> shows you image with alternative description.
But what James is getting at is that from an accessibility and usability
point
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Improvement on Flash Satay
Hi
The idea of the cascading object tag is to place alternate
*descriptive* content that reflects the intent of the content the user
can't access, rather than a "no flash
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 06:18 -0400, James Ellis wrote:
> The idea of the cascading object tag is to place alternate
> *descriptive* content that reflects the intent of the content the user
> can't access, rather than a "no flash" image.
Is there anything wrong with having an image as an intermediat
Hi
The idea of the cascading object tag is to place alternate
*descriptive* content that reflects the intent of the content the user
can't access, rather than a "no flash" image.
HTH
James
On 7/20/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> so browser that doesn't support flash
guage
:-D
cheers
Daniel
- Original Message -
From:
Jamie Mason
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 11:10
AM
Subject: [WSG] Improvement on Flash
Satay
http://www.blatek.co.uk/blateksatay/
I quite like it,
what do you think?
http://www.blatek.co.uk/blateksatay/
I quite like it,
what do you think?
