Re: [WSG] JS Percentages?

2004-05-17 Thread YoYoEtc
Thank you. This is a very helpful answer. At 12:08 AM 5/10/2004, Ryan Christie wrote: YoYoEtc wrote: And if some users do indeed disable it, what sort of code do you put it as an alternative to get the site to do what you want it to do? Server-side languages such as PHP or ASP. JS is a client

Re: [WSG] JS Percentages?

2004-05-11 Thread JonathanC
Return Receipt Your document: Re: [WSG] JS Percentages? was received by: Jonathan Cooper/ARTGAL-NSW/AU at: 11/05/2004 10:12:49 PM * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail

Re: [WSG] JS Percentages?

2004-05-10 Thread Mordechai Peller
YoYoEtc wrote: And if some users do indeed disable it, what sort of code do you put it as an alternative to get the site to do what you want it to do? As a rule of thumb, never trust anything to JavaScript except in the following cases: 1) You have control of the environment (intranet, sever

[WSG] JS Percentages?

2004-05-09 Thread Ryan Christie
I wouldn't trust JS as far as I could throw it (can you throw code?) ... but is there a statistic on how many users actually disable it in their browsers? Is it possible to sniff that out, and if so, how many users per group are we talking about? -Ryan

Re: [WSG] JS Percentages?

2004-05-09 Thread YoYoEtc
And if some users do indeed disable it, what sort of code do you put it as an alternative to get the site to do what you want it to do? At 11:23 PM 5/9/2004, Ryan Christie wrote: I wouldn't trust JS as far as I could throw it (can you throw code?) ... but is there a statistic on how many users

Re: [WSG] JS Percentages?

2004-05-09 Thread Ryan Christie
YoYoEtc wrote: And if some users do indeed disable it, what sort of code do you put it as an alternative to get the site to do what you want it to do? Server-side languages such as PHP or ASP. JS is a client language because it's dependant on a user's browser to supply the processing power for