Re: [WSG] Min-Width, IE, Fluid Content and Hair Loss

2006-02-25 Thread David Hucklesby
Yesterday, Joseph R. B. Taylor said: I have a min-width applied to my wrapper div of 842px, and a width set to 95%. That way it doesn't squish up (in small resolutions) too much and force floats downward. Needless to day, it doesn't work on IE since it doesn't recognize min-width. There

[WSG] Min-Width, IE, Fluid Content and Hair Loss

2006-02-24 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor
Greetings all, I'm working on getting a site launched - http://mcdowell.sitesbyjoe.com - and was hoping to make it completely fluid in all directions. One problem, IE (surprise!) I have a min-width applied to my wrapper div of 842px, and a width set to 95%. That way it doesn't squish

Re: [WSG] Min-Width, IE, Fluid Content and Hair Loss

2006-02-24 Thread Martin Heiden
Joseph, Friday, February 24, 2006, 5:06:39 PM, you wrote: JRBT I have a min-width applied to my wrapper div of 842px, and a width set JRBT to 95%. That way it doesn't squish up (in small resolutions) too much JRBT and force floats downward. You can try the javascript-solution that Al Sparber

Re: [WSG] Min-Width, IE, Fluid Content and Hair Loss

2006-02-24 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor
Thank you Project VII! I could of sworn I had looked at that... Joseph R. B. Taylor Sites by Joe, LLC http://sitesbyjoe.com (609)335-3076 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Martin Heiden wrote: Joseph, Friday, February 24, 2006, 5:06:39 PM, you wrote: JRBT I have a min-width applied to my wrapper div of

Re: [WSG] Min-Width, IE, Fluid Content and Hair Loss

2006-02-24 Thread Darren West
If you werent worried about users without JavaScript enabled you could use this http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/, alternatively have a fixed size for IE. Daz On 24/02/06, Joseph R. B. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings all, I'm working on getting a site launched -