Re: [WSG] Min-Width, IE, Fluid Content and Hair Loss

2006-02-25 Thread David Hucklesby
Yesterday, Joseph R. B. Taylor said:

 I have a min-width applied to my wrapper div of 842px, and a width set
 to 95%.  That way it doesn't squish up (in small resolutions) too much
 and force floats downward.

 Needless to day, it doesn't work on IE since it doesn't recognize
 min-width.

There is a CSS solution. See Stu Nicholls's solution here:

  http://www.cssplay.co.uk/boxes/minwidth.html

Cordially,
David
--
David Hucklesby, on 2/25/2006
http://www.hucklesby.com/
--



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] Min-Width, IE, Fluid Content and Hair Loss

2006-02-24 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor

Greetings all,

I'm working on getting a site launched - http://mcdowell.sitesbyjoe.com 
- and was hoping to make it completely fluid in all directions.


One problem, IE (surprise!)

I have a min-width applied to my wrapper div of 842px, and a width set 
to 95%.  That way it doesn't squish up (in small resolutions) too much 
and force floats downward.


Needless to day, it doesn't work on IE since it doesn't recognize min-width.

I've tried various workarounds/ searches on this, setting a width of 
842px in IE only etc...


These techniques keep it from shrinking, but I lose the fluid expansion 
that works so nicely on everything else...


Anyone have suggestions on this?

Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sites by Joe, LLC
http://sitesbyjoe.com
(609)335-3076
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Min-Width, IE, Fluid Content and Hair Loss

2006-02-24 Thread Martin Heiden
Joseph,

Friday, February 24, 2006, 5:06:39 PM, you wrote:

JRBT I have a min-width applied to my wrapper div of 842px, and a width set
JRBT to 95%.  That way it doesn't squish up (in small resolutions) too much
JRBT and force floats downward.

You can try the javascript-solution that Al Sparber promotes on his
page:

http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/css/minwidth/

Download the Dreamweaver Extension or extract the JS from the
Demo-Page.

You could also fix it by feeding IE a expression in a speacial
stylesheet hidden from the good browsers by a conditional comment.

regards

  Martin

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Min-Width, IE, Fluid Content and Hair Loss

2006-02-24 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor

Thank you Project VII!  I could of sworn I had looked at that...

Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sites by Joe, LLC
http://sitesbyjoe.com
(609)335-3076
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Martin Heiden wrote:

Joseph,

Friday, February 24, 2006, 5:06:39 PM, you wrote:

JRBT I have a min-width applied to my wrapper div of 842px, and a width set
JRBT to 95%.  That way it doesn't squish up (in small resolutions) too much
JRBT and force floats downward.

You can try the javascript-solution that Al Sparber promotes on his
page:

http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/css/minwidth/

Download the Dreamweaver Extension or extract the JS from the
Demo-Page.

You could also fix it by feeding IE a expression in a speacial
stylesheet hidden from the good browsers by a conditional comment.

regards

  Martin

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Min-Width, IE, Fluid Content and Hair Loss

2006-02-24 Thread Darren West
If you werent worried about users without JavaScript enabled you could
use this http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/, alternatively have a fixed
size for IE.

Daz

On 24/02/06, Joseph R. B. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Greetings all,

 I'm working on getting a site launched - http://mcdowell.sitesbyjoe.com
 - and was hoping to make it completely fluid in all directions.

 One problem, IE (surprise!)

 I have a min-width applied to my wrapper div of 842px, and a width set
 to 95%.  That way it doesn't squish up (in small resolutions) too much
 and force floats downward.

 Needless to day, it doesn't work on IE since it doesn't recognize min-width.

 I've tried various workarounds/ searches on this, setting a width of
 842px in IE only etc...

 These techniques keep it from shrinking, but I lose the fluid expansion
 that works so nicely on everything else...

 Anyone have suggestions on this?

 Joseph R. B. Taylor
 Sites by Joe, LLC
 http://sitesbyjoe.com
 (609)335-3076
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**