Re: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-17 Thread Tom Ditmars
On 16-Jun-10 12:34, Kevin Erickson wrote: Arrrgh! Thanks for the attempt but it still warns on the MIME type after the change suggested. I guess I can move on but can anyone tell me what the issue is??? Right here: meta http-equiv=content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 / Also, as

Re: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-17 Thread Frances de Waal
Hi Kevin, The MIME type application/xhtml+xml may be the right choise in theorie but causes some problems in practice. We have finally decided to stop using it for mobile devices. Besides of that if your site will be maintained with a CMS you can't control the content and a page might go

RE: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-16 Thread Kevin Erickson
Thanks much!! I will try this. -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Phil Archer Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 1:51 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails The Doctype

RE: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-16 Thread Kevin Erickson
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails The Doctype for XHTML Basic 1.1 is: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.1//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic11.dtd; HTH Phil. Kevin Erickson wrote: Question: For the line

RE: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-16 Thread Spellacy, Michael
Of Kevin Erickson Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 12:35 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails Arrrgh! Thanks for the attempt but it still warns on the MIME type after the change suggested. I guess I can move on but can anyone tell me what the issue

[WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-15 Thread Kevin Erickson
Hello All, If anyone can help me understand why my mobile page passes all accept the MIME type. Page code: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8? !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//WAPFORUM//DTD XHTML Mobile 1.0//EN http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xhtml-mobile10.dtd; html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;

RE: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-15 Thread Spellacy, Michael
...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Erickson Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 5:32 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails Hello All, If anyone can help me understand why my mobile page passes all accept the MIME type. Page code: ?xml version=1.0

Re: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-15 Thread Phil Archer
Hi Kevin, The answer is in your e-mail. You have created a page using a version of XHTML for which the correct MIME type is application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml or application/xhtml+xml but you're sending text/html so there is a mismatch, hence the warning. The recommended markup for mobile is

Re: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-15 Thread Kevin Erickson
] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails Hi Kevin, The answer is in your e-mail. You have created a page using a version of XHTML for which the correct MIME type is application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml or application/xhtml+xml but you're sending text/html so there is a mismatch, hence the warning

RE: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-15 Thread Kevin Erickson
] On Behalf Of Phil Archer Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 6:15 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails Hi Kevin, The answer is in your e-mail. You have created a page using a version of XHTML for which the correct MIME type is application/vnd.wap.xhtml

Re: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-15 Thread Phil Archer
Page Passes but MIME Type Fails Hi Kevin, The answer is in your e-mail. You have created a page using a version of XHTML for which the correct MIME type is application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml or application/xhtml+xml but you're sending text/html so there is a mismatch, hence the warning