Interesting thoughts from Vincent Flanders:
http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/biggest-web-design-mistakes-in-2004.html
Go to number 3: Mystical belief in the power of Web Standards, Usability,
and tableless CSS
What do you think?
Stephen
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by
Funny. I agree with this article. I even wrote something quite similar
a while ago:
http://www.i-marco.nl/weblog/archive/2005/04/07/why_xhtml
Web standards are great for perfectionists like us. I love them and I'll
continue to use them and teach other people how to use them but honestly,
they
Go to number 3: Mystical belief in the power of Web Standards,
Usability, and tableless CSS
What do you think?
That he might be particularly right. All of this is not self-salutary,
there are many other points that lead to a successful website.
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz |
quote
There is nothing wrong with any of the above except they're being touted
by...guess who?...people who offer web design services specializing
in...guess what?...Web Standards, Usability, and tableless CSS. These are
simply tools. Remember, nobody gets excited about the tools used to build a
Yep, he probably is right about that , but he's wrong about something
else . My home page uses web standards and it's no monument to great
design.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webpagesthatsuck.com%2F...
Jan Brasna wrote:
Go to number 3: Mystical belief in the power of
Original Message From: Stevio
Sent: 20 April 2005 14:49
Interesting thoughts from Vincent Flanders:
http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/biggest-web-design-mistakes-in-2004.html
Go to number 3: Mystical belief in the power of Web Standards, Usability,
and tableless CSS
What do you think?
Further more (this rubbish by or about people justifying their inability to
do a job right really annoys me).
A person developing a website is expected to produce a product that serves
HTML or XHTML and through that some other files (images, stylesheets etc.)
to a browser. Lets just go with the
quote
Web Standards, Usability, and tableless CSS. These are
simply tools. Remember, nobody gets excited about the tools used to build a
house (Please tell me what brand of hammers you used!). People get excited
about how the house looks and performs.
/quote
Surely they're not so much tools as
There is a vital ingredient in web design which is never mentioned by guys
like this : IMAGE. There are many web sites which sell nothing but image -
no products, no marketing: just image. Such a site is:
http://www.fosterandpartners.com/internetsite/Flash.html
It suffers from many of the
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:41:34 +0100, designer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a vital ingredient in web design which is never mentioned by
guys like this : IMAGE. There are many web sites which sell nothing
but image -
no products, no marketing: just image. Such a site is:
I saw the IMAGE
Yeah... Image or branding flash site looks IMHO different than this.
This looks really quickly put together with no intention and idea.
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list
Original Message by Bob McClelland
There is a vital ingredient in web design which is never mentioned by guys
like this : IMAGE. There are many web sites which sell nothing
but image -
no products, no marketing: just image. Such a site is:
Yep, he probably is right about that , but he's wrong about something else
. My home page uses web standards and it's no monument to great design.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webpagesthatsuck.com%2F...
Hah! But theres only *88* errors, so its not that bad ;)
An interesting peiceOn 4/20/05, Paul Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, he probably is right about that , but he's wrong about something
else. My home page uses web standards and it's no
monument to great design. http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webpagesthatsuck.com%2F...
There is a vital ingredient in web design which is never mentioned by guys
like this : IMAGE. There are many web sites which sell nothing but image
The Web Pages That Suck guy sort of covers that, further down the
page. He says (in his section on Mystery Meat) that it's OK for
certain sites:
Hi
If you use a rubber hammer, you'll never be able to bang the nails in
to build the house in the first place.
Of course. having a discussion here doesn't help -- it's preaching to
the converted. Stick it in his blog somewhere, he alludes to it but I
couldn't find. Stick it somewhere so Google
http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/biggest-web-design-mistakes-in-2004.html
What do you think?
Well... the piece would would have made sense if his point was you
still need to do this, but you need to filter the way you tell the
client. Instead, the implication here is that we should stop
17 matches
Mail list logo
