Michael
I agree with your budgetary concerns. To fill this void, many
universities are now merging their art departments with their media
studies departments to offer advanced programs for graphic artists and
web developers so that they can wear both hats [graphic
designer-developer
Hi I am just very new to the group and
would like to have a url to see this beautiful site. Could you please send one.
Thanks Sandy
come and play on the board
http://www.artgally.com
Come and see the art show
http://www.artgally.com/cswart
Come and see the poetry show
Hi I am just very new to the group and
would like to have a url to see this beautiful site. Could you please send one.
Thanks Sandy
come and play on the board
http://www.artgally.com
Come and see the art show
http://www.artgally.com/cswart
Come and see the poetry show
All I got when I clicked on these URLs was page not
available.
Kim Buttery, Richmond, VA
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sandra
WoodsSent: Monday, March 15, 2004 7:55 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [WSG] New CSS
site
Hi I am just very new
Jim
I think you're referring to my Flash business site, www.universalhead.com, rather than the css one www.cinema4duser.com.
This is OT since it's not a css site, but the music doesn't come back on if you nav to another part of the site. Only if you refresh - which is unavoidable since the flash
Michael,
Peter Gifford's beautiful work makes me wonder if I should call myself
a designer at all.
But what he didn't say was what I have long maintained.
The fact that everyone (more or less) can pick up a pencil does not
mean that everyone can draw beautifully.
In the same way, the fact
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hugh Todd
Sent: Monday, 15 March 2004 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] New CSS site
Michael,
Peter Gifford's beautiful work makes me wonder if I should call myself
a designer at all.
But what he didn't say was what I have long maintained
MACKAY Q 4740
Ph: 07 4953 4035
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Michael Kear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 1:18 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] New CSS site
You are quite right, Hugh. I'm a professional at what I do, and I tell my
clients
Hi Peter...very clean looking site...sweet indeed.
Only crit I found was in your div class=featurebox the img's (FEATUREARTCLE)
(GO) move approx: 3px to the right when hovering over the latter - in Opera 7.11 Build
2887.
Apart from that totally mini-glitch, the site looks brill.
Well done.
Hi all
Just about to be officially announced, my new fully CSS/XHTML 1.0 Trans site, and the smoothest experience I've had with css so far:
http://www.cinema4duser.com
Comments and crits most welcome.
Peter
x-tad-bigger
/x-tad-biggerUniversal Head
Design That Works.
7/43 Bridge Rd Stanmore
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 12 March 2004 11:50
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [WSG] New CSS
site
Hi all
Just about to be officially announced, my new fully CSS/XHTML 1.0 Trans
site, and the smoothest experience I've had with css so far:
http://www.cinema4duser.com
Comments
http://www.cinema4duser.com
Comments and crits
most welcome.
first
impression: looks lush! very slick. easy to scan/understand whats going
on..
some
real quik thoughts that may relate to the css but also some general stuff (take
with a grain of salt and all that ;-)
with
yr
Very nice Peter. Smooth and clean is all good.
I used to play around with Cinema 4D on the go ole Amiga. Heh, that
brings back some fond memories. ;)
Cheers
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 11:49, Universal Head wrote:
Hi all
Just about to be officially
Thanks Tim
You can have as many h1's as you want - it's just a general class for a level 1 heading.
Cheers
Peter
On 12/03/2004, at 12:14 PM, Hill, Tim wrote:
looks awesome, fonts used in titles are really cool, love the effect.
the only thing I could see was and I don't know if I'm right
Title: Message
http://www.cinema4duser.comComments and crits
most welcome.Peter
Impressive. Very
clean, easy to navigate. Links work, downloads work, images are crisp,
text is clear and pleasurably readable. Only thing I wondered about was
the extra click I had to do, to get to the Omega
Your site does look very nice...
one more note about your standardsy message...
My palm browser is the most uptodate (at least until minimo arrives!)
but you are prompting me to upgrade?!
not a major grumble, but changing the wording might be appreciated
also I like it but some accessibility
Peter
Nice one, works well with styles and images turned off as well.
The validator is having some issues with link rel=shortcut icon
try
link rel=icon ... / instead and you'll have a valid site!
Also, if you ever move to Strict, the language attribute in your script
tag won't be needed - the
In response to your extremely helpful feedback, thankyou for it all:
standardsy message ... not a major grumble, but changing the wording might be appreciated
Regarding the accessability message, any suggestions for changing the wording? Is there a 'satandard' blurb? How come so many people saw
This doesn't validate either - does anyone have the correct validating code for inserting a favicon?
Peter
On 12/03/2004, at 12:50 PM, James Ellis wrote:
The validator is having some issues with link rel=shortcut icon
trylink rel=icon ... /> instead and you'll have a valid site!
x-tad-bigger
link
rel="shortcut icon" href=""http://webboy.net/webboy.ico">http://webboy.net/webboy.ico"
/
From: Universal Head
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 1:36
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [WSG] New
CSS site
This does
]
*Sent:* Friday, March 12, 2004 1:36 PM
*To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Subject:* Re: [WSG] New CSS site
This doesn't validate either - does anyone have the correct
validating code for inserting a favicon?
Peter
On 12/03/2004, at 12:50 PM, James Ellis wrote:
The validator
You can put the favicon.ico file in the webroot. This works without the
need for any markup.
However this doesn't work for IE. Works fine other browsers. IE is also
picky about the file format.
Cheers
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 13:35, Universal Head wrote:
If your happy to have the same favicon throughout the site's pages you
don't need any code in the head.
You just need to place the favicon.ico in the root dir.
Ian.
This doesn't validate either - does anyone have the correct
validating
code for inserting a favicon?
Peter
On
: [WSG] New CSS site
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:49:43 +1100
Hi all
Just about to be officially announced, my new fully CSS/XHTML 1.0
Trans
site, and the smoothest experience I've had with css so far:
http://www.cinema4duser.com
Comments and crits most welcome.
Peter
Universal Head
Design
Peter,
About browser warning messages...
About 8 months ago Peter (Firminger - listdad) and I took off all of our
browser warnings entirely.
The message is designed for older browsers (with significant political
reasons at the time it was developed) but it is a pain for other devices
that are
What a shock! ;)
link rel=shortcut icon href=http://www.cinema4duser.com/favicon.ico />
works fine and also vaidates it seems. And you only have to put it in the index.html page.
Thanks
P
On 12/03/2004, at 2:01 PM, Chris Blown wrote:
However this doesn't work for IE. Works fine other
Thankyou David and Russ, a great suggestion which I will put into practice now. I was copying the habit of other sites by doing this, and you're right, it doesn't seem necessary.
P
On 12/03/2004, at 2:03 PM, David McDonald wrote:
Personally, I'd probably loose the standards message altogether
You can also add
link rel=[shortcut ]icon type=image/png href=/path/to/icon.png /
Although this will not work on IE. Shortcut icons work very variably in
IE anyway and even then only when you bookmark a page (sometimes). I've
rarely got them showing up when I used IE in the ol' days.. I use
Peter
Excellent work I love the styling. Leslie's comment on an extra click
is worth doing and Scott's comment on navigational contrast is a
factor. I personally did think the lack of contrast on the horizontal
navbar buttons was hard to read. I viewed it in Safari 1.1 1.2 Mac
MSIE 5.2.2
As long as you don't mind all the 404 errors.
Best practice:
* Use the icon format with as many versions as you like (16x16, 32x32, 16
colour, 256 colour etc.) within that file.
* Use favicon.ico as the filename and put in in the site root. This will
account for a majority by default.
* On every
I meant end of favicon topic, not feedback on the site.
Sorry,
P
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*
Hi Peter,
The design appears to be clean. The site loads fast for me. My only wee
critique is that the gray font color doesn't have much contrast
compared to the background colors used. If it were a bit darker it
would be easier to read. Otherwise, I'm going to enjoy reading through
the site.
Now THIS is why I love CS - I've just increased the contrast a little. Easss
Peter
On 12/03/2004, at 3:13 PM, Sarah Sammis wrote:
If it were a bit darker it would be easier to read.
x-tad-bigger
/x-tad-biggerUniversal Head
Design That Works.
7/43 Bridge Rd Stanmore
NSW 2048 Australia
Peter,
Now THIS is why I love CS - I've just increased the contrast a little.
Easss
now you are getting it :-)
john
John Allsopp
:: westciv ::
software, courses, resources for a standards based web
style master blog http://westciv.typepad.com/dog_or_higher/
http://www.westciv.com/
CSS is great that way. The text is easier to read now.
Cheers
Sarah
On Thursday, Mar 11, 2004, at 20:28 US/Pacific, Universal Head wrote:
Now THIS is why I love CS - I've just increased the contrast a little. Easss
Peter
On 12/03/2004, at 3:13 PM, Sarah Sammis wrote:
If it were a
Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks
http://afpwebworks.com
From:
Universal Head [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 12 March 2004 3:28
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] New CSS site
Now THIS is why I love CS
- I've just increased the contrast a little. Easss
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [WSG] New CSS
site
Hi all
Just about to be officially announced, my new fully CSS/XHTML 1.0 Trans
site, and the smoothest experience I've had with css so far:
http://www.cinema4duser.com
Comments and crits most welcome.
Peter
Universal
Mike - hilarious! I freaked out there for a sec!!
Never fear, there a plenty of sites online that I hate and loathe too. Todd Dominey and whatdoiknow.org - the guy is a sensitive designer AND can program (it makes me sick!) ... www.jasonsantamaria.com ... damn, I've had that idea for ages and he
Peter,
Great looking site - very beautiful from an aesthetics POV. Can't add much value
to the other comments you've had except maybe... found the body text font on the
small side - especially on the iMac here at work). You could add some more
keywords to the title tag to feed the search engines
39 matches
Mail list logo
