Terrence Wood wrote Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:02:32 +1300:
On 22 Feb 2006, at 2:50 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Outlook users should ...switch to a better mail client that isn't
broken.
Outllok can be configured to send plain text can't it?
I think an equally big problem with Outhouse is that it
Terrence Wood wrote:
On 22 Feb 2006, at 2:50 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Outlook users should ...switch to a better mail client that isn't broken.
Outllok can be configured to send plain text can't it?
It can, but there are a variety of serious problems with Outlook that
make it an extremely
On 22/02/06, Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All incoming HTML and other multipart gets filtered automatically to my
trash, and so I only open what looks safe according to subject lines.
Good thing for the subject key [WSG] or many posts from this list would
never get opened, unlike WD
At 09:46 AM 2/22/2006, Nick Gleitzman wrote:
... could list members please use plain text for posting? ... kinder to
those who only have dialup connections ...
And those of us on slow supposedly broadband wireless links.
... makes the posts more legible. I, for one, tend to skip over posts
'I miss Mozilla mail' Bennett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Worthington
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 12:23 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Plain text v HTML on this list
At 09:46 AM 2/22/2006, Nick Gleitzman
THREAD CLOSED
Please do not reply to this thread - it has already been closed
Russ
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting
A frequent request, which occasionally needs to be remade: could list
members please use plain text for posting? It makes the posts much
smaller in file size, which is kinder to those who only have dialup
connections (yes, there are still some), but more importantly, makes
the posts more
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
A frequent request, which occasionally needs to be remade: could list
members please use plain text for posting?
Yes, absolutely! The following articles discuss the various issues
further. Although they generally relate to USENET, most of the advice
applies equally to
On 22 Feb 2006, at 2:50 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Outlook users should ...switch to a better mail client that isn't
broken.
Outllok can be configured to send plain text can't it?
I usually don't bother to read the 1mm tall text it sends out
(screenshots on request), unless I'm really
On 2/22/06, Terrence Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 Feb 2006, at 2:50 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Outlook users should ...switch to a better mail client that isn't
broken.
Outllok can be configured to send plain text can't it?
I think Lachlan meant that + bottom-quoting?
On 2/21/06 11:10 PM Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
On 22 Feb 2006, at 2:50 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Outlook users should ...switch to a better mail client that isn't
broken.
Outllok can be configured to send plain text can't it?
I think Lachlan meant that + bottom-quoting?
11 matches
Mail list logo
